A Multiple Correspondence Analysis Approach to the Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty in Morocco 2001–2007

  • Abdeljaouad Ezzrari
  • Paolo VermeEmail author
Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 9)


The measurement of multidimensional poverty has been advocated by most welfare scholars and is experiencing a growth in interest partly explained by controversial debates emerged across academics and practitioners. This chapter follows one of the least explored approaches—multiple correspondence analysis (MCA)—to assess multidimensional poverty in Morocco between 2001 and 2007. MCA provides two major advantages for the measurement of multidimensional poverty: it generates a matrix of “weights” based on the variance-covariance matrix of all welfare dimensions selected and provides a natural approach for constructing a composite welfare indicator that satisfies essential poverty orderings axioms. The application shows that poverty in Morocco has declined according to both monetary and multidimensional indicators and that these findings are robust to stochastic dominance tests. This chapter concludes that the sustained positive growth that Morocco experienced during the last decade has translated in improvements in living conditions well beyond monetary returns.


Poverty Line Poor Household Stochastic Dominance Composite Indicator Multiple Correspondence Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors are grateful to Florent Bresson and Valérie Bérenger for very useful comments.


  1. Alkire, S. & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asselin, L. M. (2009). Analysis of multidimensional poverty: Theory and case-studies. Economic studies in inequality, social exclusion and well-being (Vol. 7). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A., & Bourguignon, F. (1982). The comparison of multidimensioned distributions of economic status. Review of Economic Studies, 49, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benzécri, J-P. (1973). Analyse des Donnees (Vols. 1, 2). Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  5. Decancq, K. & Lugo, M. A. (2010). Weights in multidimensional indices of well-being: An overview, Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
  6. Douidich M., Ezzrari A. & Soudi K. (2009). Dynamique de la pauvreté au Maroc: 1985–2007, Cahiers du plan N° 26, Haut Commissariat au Plan—Rabat.Google Scholar
  7. Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D., & Younger, S. (2001). Robust multi-dimensional poverty comparisons. Economic Journal, 116(514), 943–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kolm, S. C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianisms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(1977), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maasoumi, E. (1986). The measurement and decomposition of multidimensional inequality. Econometrica, 54, 771–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Njong, A. M. & Dschang, P. N. (2008). Characterising weights in the measurement of multidimensional poverty: An application of data-driven approaches to Cameroonian data. OPHI Working Paper No. 21, wired at 1.
  12. Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sen, A. K. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Observatory for Living Standards Conditions, High Commission for the PlanRabatMorocco
  2. 2.The World Bank and Department of Economics, University of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations