Subjective Well-Being, Activation Policies, and the Inclusion Agenda

  • Marina PetrovicEmail author
Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 8)


This chapter presents an application of subjective well-being measures to the analysis of a specific public policy. It explores whether and how activation of social assistance recipients through public works impacts on their subjective well-being outcomes. The program under analysis is the public works program in Serbia. This chapter provides a conceptual framework for understanding the main dimensions of subjective well-being for the unemployed poor and places the overall discussion in the context of work activation of welfare recipients. The applied qualitative analysis of the data obtained from semi-structured in-depth interviews focuses on the changes in different dimensions of subjective well-being. It takes into account the periods before and after the public work activity. Despite the low employment rate of program participants after the completion of the program, the qualitative analysis reveals significant positive impact of work engagement on subjective well-being of social assistance recipients. The evidence is strongest in relation to their positive perceptions about the level of acquired qualifications, skills, and social contacts.


Labor Market Life Satisfaction Social Contact Public Work Social Inclusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arandarenko, M., & Krstić, G. (2008) Analiza uticaja politike zapošljavanja i aktivnih mera tržišta rada u Republici Srbiji 2003–2007. Accessed 1 March 2010.
  2. Berg, B. (1989). Qualitative research methods for social science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Bonin, H., & Rinne, U. (2006) Beautiful Serbia, IZA Discussion paper No. 2533. Accessed 1 December 2008.
  4. Cummins, R.A. (1996) Domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E. (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997) Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25-41.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997) Measuring quality of life; Economic, social, and subjective ­indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1-2), 189-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (1999) Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110 (466), 918-938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002) Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Layard, R. (2006) Happiness and public Policy: A challenge to the profession. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Matkovic, G (2009) Poverty in Serbia during the transition – Trends, policies, dilemmas. Accessed 1 March 2010.
  12. Matkovic, G., Mijatovic, B., & Petrovic, M. (2010) Impact of the financial crisis on the labor market and living condition outcomes in Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia: CLDS.Google Scholar
  13. Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000) Voices of the poor: Crying out for change, New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petrovic (2011) Social Assistance and activation: In search of inclusive policy options, MDG Achievement Fund/Center for Liberal-Democratic Studies, Belgrade, Serbia.Google Scholar
  15. Petrovic, M. (2009) Aktivacija korisnika MOP-a u Srbiji (“Prvi pecat u radnoj knjizici”), Izvestaj za Tim za socijalno ukljucivanje i smanjenje siromastva, Kabinet potpredsednika Vlade za evropske integracije,Vlada Republike Srbije, Srbija.Google Scholar
  16. Van Praag, B., & Ferrer, A. (2004) Happiness quantified: a satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Veenhoven, R. (2000) Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in 46 nations in the early 1990’s. In Diener, E., & E.M. Suh (Ed.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 257-288). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  18. Veenhoven, R. (1991) Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Veenhoven, R. (2004) Subjective measures of well-being. WIDER Discussion Paper, 2004/07. United Nations University. Accessed 1 December 2008.
  20. Vlada Republike Srbije (2009) Izvestaj o relaizaciji javnih radova od interesa za Republiku Srbiju u 2008. godini. Beograd, Srbija.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations