Advertisement

On Measuring Social Exclusion: A New Approach with an Application to FYR Macedonia

  • Joseph DeutschEmail author
  • Jacques Silber
  • Paolo Verme
Chapter
Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 8)

Abstract

This chapter proposes an original methodology to measure social exclusion and applies it to the UNDP/UNICEF 2010 survey dataset on social exclusion in FYR Macedonia. Following a brief presentation of some general features of the economic and social situation in FYR Macedonia, this chapter explains first that the multivariate technique called correspondence analysis allows one to aggregate in one factor, separately for each domain of social exclusion, the variables that are available to characterize this domain. Then an approach commonly used in productivity analysis and called stochastic production frontier is presented. This technique allowed us to derive a latent vector assumed to represent the level of overall social exclusion of each of the individuals in the survey. In the last section of this chapter, an attempt is made to find out what the determinants of social exclusion are by regressing the latent variable assumed to describe social exclusion on a certain number of explanatory variables such as the level of education, the marital status, and the age of the individual.

Keywords

Social Capital Correspondence Analysis Social Exclusion Income Poverty Input Distance Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aigner, D., C. A. K. Lovell and P. Schmidt (1977) “Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,” Journal of Econometrics, 6: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asselin, L.-M. and Vu Tuan Anh “Multidimensional Poverty and Multiple Correspondence Analysis,” in N. Kakwani and J. Silber editors, Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, Palgrave-Macmillan, (2008).Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A., Marlier, E., Nolan, B. (2004) “Indicators and Targets for Social Inclusion in the European Union,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (1): 47–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Government (2009) The Origins, Meaning, Definition and Economic Implications of the Concept Social Inclusion/Exclusion. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  5. Battese, G.E. and G.S. Corra (1977) “Estimation of a production frontier model: With application to the pastoral zones of eastern Australia”, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21: 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Béland, D. (2007) “The social exclusion discourse: ideas and policy change” Policy and Politics 35(1): 123–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benzécri, J.-P. and Benzécri F. (1980) Pratique de L’Analyse des Données, I, Analyse des Correspondances, Exposé Elémentaire, Paris: Dunod Bordas.Google Scholar
  8. Berrebi, Z. M. and J. Silber, “Health and Development: Socio-Economic Determinants of Mortality Structure,” Social Science and Medicine, 15C (1981): 31–39.Google Scholar
  9. Coelli, T. (1992) “A computer program for Frontier Production Function Estimation: Version Frontier 2.0”, Economic Letters, 39: 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coelli, T., D.S. Prasada Rao and G.E. Battese (1998) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deutsch, J., X. Ramos and J. Silber, “Poverty and Inequality of Standard of Living and Quality of Life in Great Britain,” in Advances in Quality-of-Life Theory and Research, J. Sirgy, D. Rahtz and A.C. Samli, editors, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, (2003) pp. 99–128.Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch, J. and J. Silber, “Religion, Standard of Living and the Quality of Life,” Contemporary Jewry, 20 (1999):119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrell, M.J. (1957) “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, CXX: 253–90Google Scholar
  14. Green W.H. (1992) LIMDEP Version 6.0: User’s Manual and Reference Guide, Econometric Software Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  15. Kakwani, N. and J. Silber, editors, Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, Palgrave-Macmillan, (2008).Google Scholar
  16. Klanfer, J. (1965) L’Exclusion sociale: Étude de la marginalité dans les sociétés occidentales, Paris: Bureau de Recherches sociales.Google Scholar
  17. Lenoir, R., (1974) Les Exclus: Un Francais sur Dix. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  18. Lovell, C.A.K, S. Richardson, P. Travers and L. Wood (1994) “Resources and functionings: A new view of inequality in Australia”, in Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality (ed. W. Eichhorn), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  19. Marlier, E., A. B. Atkinson, B. Cantillon and B. Nolan (2007) The EU and Social Inclusion. Facing the Challenges. The Policy Press, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Massé P. (1964) Les dividendes du progrès, Rapport du Secrétaire General du Plan, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  21. Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck (1977) “Efficiency estimates from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error”, International Economic Review, 18: 435–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Omtzigt, D.-J. (2009) “Survey on Social inclusion: Theory and Policy,” Report Working Paper, Oxford Institute for Global Economic Development, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  23. Paugam, S. (2005) Les formes élémentaires de la pauvreté. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  24. Ramos, X. and J. Silber, “On the Application of Efficiency Analysis to the Study of the Dimensions of Human Development,” Review of Income and Wealth, 51(2) (2005): 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richmond, J. (1974) “Estimating the efficiency of production”, International Economic Review, 15(2): 515–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sen, A. (2000) “Social Exclusion: Concept, Application and Scrutiny,”. Development Papers No. 1, Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, Adam. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (republished, edited by R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  28. Social Protection Committee (2001) Report on Indicators in the Field of Poverty and Social Exclusion.Google Scholar
  29. Stutzer, Alois & Frey, Bruno S. (2006). “Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married?,” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 326–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Verma, V., G. Betti, M. Natilli and A. Lemmi (2006) “Indicators of Social Exclusion and Poverty in Europe’s Regions,” Working Paper n. 59, Project on Regional Indicators to Reflect Social Exclusion and Poverty (VT/2003/43) of the European Commission, Employment and Social Affairs DGGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael
  2. 2.Senior Research FellowCEPS/INSTEADEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  3. 3.The World BankWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations