Advertisement

Dark Web pp 407-425 | Cite as

International Falun Gong Movement on the Web

  • Hsinchun ChenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 30)

Abstract

Framing a collective identity is an essential process in a social movement. The identity defines the orientation of public actions to take and establishes an informal interaction network for circulating important information and material resources. While domestic social movements emphasize the coherence of identity in alliance, global or cyber activism is now flexible in its collective identity given the rise of the Internet. A campaign may include diverse social movement organizations (SMOs) with different social agendas. This flexible identity framing encourages personal involvement in direct action. On the other hand, it may damage solidarity within SMOs and make campaigns difficult to control. To assess the sustainability of an SMO, it is important to understand its collective identity and the social codes embedded within its associated cyber societies and cyber-artifacts. In this chapter, we took a cyber-archaeology approach and used the international Falun Gong (FLG) movement as a case study to investigate this identity-framing issue. We employed Social Network Analysis and Writeprint to analyze FLG’s cyber-artifacts from the perspectives of links, web content, and forum content. In the link analysis, FLG’s web sites linked closely to Chinese democracy and human rights SMOs, reflecting FLG’s historical conflicts with the Chinese government after the official ban in 1999. In the web content analysis, we used Writeprint to analyze the writings of Hongzhi Li and his editors, and found that Hongzhi Li’s writings center around the ideological teaching of Falun Dafa while the editors post specific programs to realize Li’s teaching. In the forum content analysis, FLG comprehensively organizes several different concepts on a continuum: from FLG ideology to life philosophy and mysterious phenomena, and from mysterious phenomena to anti-Chinese Communist Party and persecution by conceptualizing the Chinese government as evil. By deploying those cyber-artifacts, FLG seamlessly connects different ideologies and establishes its identity as a Qi-Gong, religious, and activist group.

Keywords

Social Movement Social Network Analysis Collective Identity Social Movement Organization Social Movement Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CNS-0709338, “CRI: CRD-Developing a Dark Web Collection and Infrastructure for Computational and Social Sciences.”

References

  1. Abbasi, A., Chen, H. (2005). “Applying Authorship Analysis to Extremist-Group Web Forum Messages,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20: 1541–1672.Google Scholar
  2. Abbasi, A., Chen, H. (2006). “Visualizing Authorship for Identification,” In: Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackland, R., O’Neil, M., Bimber, B., Gibson, R.K., Ward, S. (2006). “New Methods for Studying Online Environmental-Activist Networks,” In: 26th International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, M.R., Boas, T.C. (2003). “Falun Gong and the Internet: Evangelism, Community, and Struggle for Survival,” Nova Religio, 6: 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, W. (2003). “Communicating Global Activism,” Information, Communication and Society, 6: 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, W.L. (2005), “Social Movements beyond Borders: Understanding Two Eras of Transnational Activism,” In: Porta Dd and Tarrow S (eds) Transnational Protest and Global Activism, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, INC, New York, pp. 203–226.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, R., Rai, S.M., eds. (2000), Global Social Movements. Athlone Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, L.C. (1978/79), “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1: 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garrido, M., Halavais, A. (2003), “Mapping Networks of Support for the Zapatista Movement: Applying Social-Network Analysis to Study Contemporary Social Movements,” In: McCaughey M, Ayers MD (eds) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Gerlach, L.P. (2001), “The Structure of Social Movements: Environmental Activism and its Opponents,” In: Arquilla J, Ronfeldt DF (eds) Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Rand, Santa Monica, pp. 289–309.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, Q., Rafaeli, S. (2000), “What Do Virtual “Tells” Tell? Placing Cybersociety Research into a Hierarchy of Social Explanation,” In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  12. Keck, M.E., Sikkink, K. (1998), “Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics,” Cornell University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Langman, L. (2005), “From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements,” Sociological Theory 23: 42–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larana, E., Johnston, H., Gusfield, J.R. (1994), “New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity,” Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  15. Lu Y (2005), “Entrepreneurial Logics and the Evolution of Falun Gong,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44: 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCaughey, M., Ayers, M.D. (2003), “Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice,” Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Morris, A.D., Mueller CM (1992), “Frontiers in Social Movement Theory,” Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  18. Myers, D.J. (1994), “Communication Technology and Social Movements: Contributions of Computer Networks to Activism,” Social Science Computer Review 12: 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ong, T.H., Chen, H. (1999), “Updateable PAT-Tree Approach to Chinese Key Phrase Extraction using Mutual Information: A Linguistic Foundation for Knowledge Management,” In: Proceedings of the Second Asian Digital Library Conference, Taipei.Google Scholar
  20. Paccagnella, L. (1997), “Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Penny, B. (2003), “The Life and Times of Li Hongzhi: Falun Gong and Religious Biography,” The China Quarterly 175: 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Porta, D., Diani, M. (1999), “Social Movements: An Introduction,” Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden.Google Scholar
  23. Rahn, P. (2002), “The Chemistry of a Conflict: The Chinese Government and the Falun Gong,” Terrorism and Political Violence 14: 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, N., Fingrutd, M., Ethier, M., Karant, R., McDonald, D. (1985), “Social Movements and Network Analysis: A Case Study of Nineteenth-Century Women’s Reform in New York State,” The American Journal of Sociology 90: 1022–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott, J. (2000), “Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd edn,” Sage, London.Google Scholar
  26. Tong, J. (2002), “An Organizational Analysis of the Falun Gong: Structure, Communications, Financing,” The China Quarterly 171: 636–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994), “Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications,” Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management Information SystemsUniversity of ArizonaTusconUSA

Personalised recommendations