Dark Web pp 319-339 | Cite as

Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) on Dark Web

  • Hsinchun ChenEmail author
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 30)


This chapter presents a cyber-archaeology approach to social movement research. The approach overcomes many of the issues of scale and complexity facing social research on the Internet, enabling broad and longitudinal study of the virtual communities supporting social movements. Cultural cyber-artifacts of significance to the social movement are collected and classified using automated techniques, enabling analysis across multiple related virtual communities. Approaches to the analysis of cyber-artifacts are guided by perspectives of social movement theory. A Dark Web case study on a broad group of related IED virtual communities is presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the framework and provide a detailed instantiation of the proposed approach for evaluation.


Support Vector Machine Social Movement Support Vector Machine Model Virtual Community Link Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Funding for this research was provided by (1) NSF, “CRI: Developing a Dark Web Collection and Infrastructure for Computational and Social Sciences,” 2007–2010 and (2) NSF, “EXP-LA: Explosives and IEDs in the Dark Web: Discovery, Categorization, and Analysis,” 2007–2010.


  1. Abbasi, A. and Chen, H. (2005). Identification and comparison of extremist-group web forum messages using authorship analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(5), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal, C. C., Al-Garawi, F., and Yu, P. S. (2001). Intelligent crawling on the world wide web with arbitrary predicates. In Proceedings of the 10th WWW Conference. Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  3. Burris, V., Smith, E., and Strahm, A. (2000). White supremacist networks on the Internet. Sociological Focus, 33(2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakrabarti, S., Van Den Berg, M., and Dom, B. (1999). Focused crawling: a new approach to topic-specific resource discovery. In Proceedings of the Eighth WWW Conference. Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium – The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Collier, G. (1994). Basta! Land and the Zapatista rebellion in Chaipas. Food First Books.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, D. and Themudo, N. (2006). Linking the web and the street: Internet-based ‘dotcauses’ and the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. World Development, 34(1), 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleaver, H. (1995). The Zapatistas and the electronic fabric of struggle. Online,
  9. Cleaver, H. (1999). Computer-linked social movements and the global threat to capitalism. Online,
  10. Diani, M. (2003). Networks and social movements: A research programme. In Diani, M. and McAdam D. (eds.), Social Movements and Networks. Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diani, M. and McAdam D. (2003). Social movements and networks. Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edelman, M. (2001). Social movements: changing paradigms and forms of politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ester, M., Grob, M., and Kriegel, H. (2001). Focused web crawling: a generic framework for specifying the user interest and for adaptive crawling strategies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases.Google Scholar
  14. Finn A. and Kushmerick, N. (2006). Learning to classify documents according to genre. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1506–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, C. (2006a). The self-organization of social movements. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 19(1), 101–137.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs, C. (2006b). The self-organization of cyberprotest. In Morgan, K., Brebbia, C., and Spector, J. (eds.), The Internet Society II. Southampton/Boston. WIT Press. pp. 275-295.Google Scholar
  17. Glaser, J., Dixit, J., and Green, D. (2002). Studying hate crime with the Internet: what makes racists advocate racial violence? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herring, S. and Paolillo, J. (2006). Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In Proceedings of the ECML, (pp. 137–142).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, Q. (1997). Virtual-communities, virtual settlements, and cyber-archaeology: a theoretical outline. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, S. (1994). Cyber-society: Computer-mediated communication and community. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Jordan, T. and Taylor, P. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of freedom summer. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.Google Scholar
  24. Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the Internet. Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Santini, M. (2004). A shallow approach to syntactic feature extraction for genre classification. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Colloquium for the UK Special Interest Group for Computational Linguistics (CLUK).Google Scholar
  27. Schafer, J. (2002). Spinning the web of hate: web-based hate propagation by extremist organizations. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 9(2), 69–88.Google Scholar
  28. Shepherd, M., Watters, C., and Kaushik, R. (2001). Lessons from reading E-News for browsing the web: the role of genre and task. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 38, 256–267.Google Scholar
  29. Snow, D. and Marshall, S. (1984). Cultural imperialism, social movement, and the Islamic revival. In L. Kriesberg (ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, Vol. 7. London: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  30. Starr, A. (2000). Naming the enemy: Anti-corporate movements confront globalization. Zed Books.Google Scholar
  31. Tesh, S. (2002). The Internet and the grass roots. Organization and Environment, 15(3), 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van de Donk, W., Loader, D., Nixon, P., and Rucht, D. (2004). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2002). Islamic activism and social movement theory: a new direction for research. Mediterranean Politics, 7(3), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. (2002). Genre systems: structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zheng, R., Qin, Y., Huang, Z., and Chen, H. (2006). A framework for authorship analysis of online messages: writing-style features and techniques. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhou, Y., Reid, E., Qin, J., Chen, H., and Lai, G. (2005). U.S. extremist groups on the web: link and content analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(5), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management Information SystemsUniversity of ArizonaTusconUSA

Personalised recommendations