Web Monitoring and Strategic Issue Management: Dutch student protests against the 1040-hour norm

  • Dennis de KoolEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 1)


Social media is a label for many new Internet technologies that are used for sharing information (pictures, movies, music, and/or expertise) with other people. Examples are Linked-in, Twitter, Yammer, and blogs. Social media can gap the distance between governments and citizens. However, individuals and small groups can also use social media as a powerful mobilization tool for protesting against government policies. In 2007, Dutch students used social media to protest against the so-called 1040-hour norm. This norm refers to the total amount of teaching hours that students are required to follow each year during the first and second years of secondary education. Although required by education inspectors to comply with this norm, many schools were unable to do so, because of teacher shortages. Students complained that they were forced to be at school without taking classes and used social media to mobilize each other for mass demonstrations. At the ministry of Education, Culture and Science policy makers and the Deputy Minister in charge were completely surprised by the scale of the protests and the speed of organization of the protest actions and the mobilization force the Internet provided to the protesting students. As a result of these experiences the ministry of Education, Culture, and Science has developed an online early warning system to signalize relevant discussions about education topics on the Internet. This ‘webmonitoring’ strategy is aimed at reducing ‘strategic surprises’. This chapter analyzes the mobilization process of student protests against the 1040-hour norm in the Netherlands and the communication- and online strategy that the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science has developed since then.


Virtual World Secondary School Student Protest Action Social Media Usage Dutch Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ansoff, I. & McDonnel, E. (1990). Implanting Strategic Management. New York et al.: Prentice Hall (2nd Edn).Google Scholar
  2. Beer, D. & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. URL
  3. Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Beunders, H., Edwards, A.R. & Moody, R. (2009). De virtuele lont in het kruitvat. Welke rol spelen de oude en nieuwe media in de micromobilisatie van burgers en hun strijd om politieke aandacht? Den Haag: Uitgeverij Lemma.Google Scholar
  4. Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Straten, G., Edwards, A.R. & Kool, D. de (2011a). Spraakmakende burgers, sociale media en het strategisch vermogen van de overheid. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Edwards, A.R., Moody, R. & Beunders, H. (2011b). New Media, Micromobilization, and Political Agenda Setting: Crossover Effects in Political Mobilization and Media Usage. Public Management Review, 27 (4) 209–219.Google Scholar
  6. Bouckaert, G., Peuter, B. de & Dooren, W. van (2003). Meten en vergelijken van lokale bestuurlijke ontwikkeling: een monitoringsysteem voor het lokaal bestuur in Vlaanderen. Brugge: Die Keure.Google Scholar
  7. Boulos, K.. & Wheelert, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24 (1) 2–23.Google Scholar
  8. Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Commissie Dijsselbloem (2008). Tijd voor onderwijs. Den Haag.Google Scholar
  10. Commissie Cornielje (2008). De waarde van een norm: advies van de Commissie Onderwijstijd. Den Haag.Google Scholar
  11. Croll, A. & Power, S. (2009). Complete Web Monitoring. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  12. Eggers, W.D. (2007). Government 2.0: using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Lanham et al.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Heath, R. & Palenchar, M. (2009). Strategic issues management. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.Google Scholar
  15. Kool, D. de (2007). Monitoring in beeld: een studie naar de doorwerking van monitors in interbestuurlijke relaties. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (thesis).Google Scholar
  16. Kool, D. de (2008). Rational, political and cultural uses of performance monitors: the case of the Dutch Urban Policy. In: W. van Dooren & S. van de Wall (Eds), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (pp. 174–191), New York: Palgrave Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar
  17. Kool. D. de (2010). Ambtenaren en sociale media: kansen, risico’s en dilemma’s, Bestuurskunde, 20 (3), 35–43.Google Scholar
  18. Social Embassy (2011). Social Media Monitor 4. Hilversum.Google Scholar
  19. Sutton, J.N. (2009). Social Media Monitoring and the Democratic National Convention: New Tasks and Emergent Processes, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6 (1), article 67.Google Scholar
  20. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications (3rd ed).Google Scholar
  21. Young Works (2008). Digitale media, digitale politiek? Den Haag (evaluation).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Public Innovation, Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations