Advertisement

Social Media for Political Campaigning. The Use of Twitter by Spanish Mayors in 2011 Local Elections

  • J. Ignacio CriadoEmail author
  • Guadalupe Martínez-Fuentes
  • Aitor Silván
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 1)

Abstract

This chapter inquires into the role of social media in electoral campaigning. Although parties and leaders agree on its importance and are very interested in promoting their presence and activity on the Internet by using tools like Twitter, it is still unclear whether or not they have coherent strategies to adopt the principles of the so–called Web 2.0. This chapter provides empirical data about the presence and behavior of local political leaders in the digital/virtual social networks during the May 2011 local election campaign in Spain. It aims to answer five research questions: (1) Which candidates to the mayoralty employed Twitter during their campaign? (2) To what extent did they use Twitter? (3) Did they manage to widen or deepen their network during the campaign? (4) Did they really use Twitter to boost their dialogue with the electors linked to this network? (5) Did the candidates’ gender, age, political party, municipality have an effect in this behavior? To address these questions, this paper presents and analyzes a database that includes all the incumbent mayors of Spanish cities with a population over 100,000 inhabitants. This will make it clearer if Spanish local leaders used the digital/virtual social media only for placing their campaign message or whether they are developing new and more open campaigns based on Web 2.0 principles.

Keywords

Social Network Political Communication Electoral Campaign Local Election Female Candidate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anduiza, Eva, Aina Gallego & Marta Cantijoch (2010) ‘Online political participation in Spain: the impact of traditional and Internet resources’, Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 7 (4): 356–368.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, Samuel H. (2005) ‘La movilización política en las democracias contemporáneas: un análisis comparado’, in Francisco Llera and Pablo Oñate (eds) Política comparada. Entre lo local y lo global. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
  3. Bode, Leticia et al. (2011) ‘Mapping the Political Twitterverse: Finding Connections between Political Elites. Paper prepared for the 2011 Political Networks Conference, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  4. Cocktail Analysis (2011) Informe de Resultados. Observatorio Redes Sociales. Tercera Oleada. Available on line: http://www.tcanalysis.com. Accessed: 21-X-2011.
  5. Criado, J. Ignacio and Martinez Fuentes, Guadalupe (2010) Blogging político y personalización de la democracia local en España y Portugal. Evidencias presentes y propuestas de futuro.Madrid: Fundación Alternativas.Google Scholar
  6. Criado, J. Ignacio and Martinez Fuentes, Guadalupe (2011) ‘Mayors’ usage of blogs in local election campaign: the Spanish case study’, International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3 (4): 395–413Google Scholar
  7. Dalton, Rusell (2002) ‘The decline of party identifications’, in Rusell Dalton and Martin Wattemberg (eds) Parties without partisans: political change in advanced industrial democracies. Oxfors: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
  8. EUROSTAT (2011). Europe 2020 Indicators. Available on line: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/themes. Accessed: 21-X-2011.
  9. Fundación Orange (2011). Informe eEspaña 2010. Fundación Orange: Madrid. Available on line: http://www.informeeespana.es/docs/eE2011.pdf. Accessed: 21-X-2011.
  10. Gaines, Brian J. & Mondak, Jeffery J. (2009) ‘Typing Together? Clustering of Ideological Types in Online Social Networks’. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6 (3,4), 216–231.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, Rachel K. (2010) ‘’Open Source Campaigning?’: UK Party Organisations and the Use of the New Media in the 2010 General Election’ Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC. Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, Rachel K. & Ian McAllister (2011) ‘Do Online Election Campaigns Win Votes? The 2007 Australian ““YouTube”” Election’, Political Communication, 28(2), 227–244Google Scholar
  13. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). ‘Twitter Use by the U. S. Congress’. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61(8), 1612–1621.Google Scholar
  14. Gueorguieva. V. (2008) ‘Voters, MySpace, and TouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the 2006 Election Cycle and Beyond’. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 311–28.Google Scholar
  15. Gulati, Girish J. & Williams, Christine B. (2010) ‘Congressional Candidates’ Use of YouTube in 2008: Its Frequency and Rationale’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2), 93–109.Google Scholar
  16. Hanna, A., Sayre, B., Bode, L., Yang, J.H., and Shah, D. (2011). ‘Mapping the Political Twittervers: Candidates and their Followers in the Midterms’. Proceedings of the Fifth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AIII) Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
  17. Holbrook, Thomas.M. (1996) Do campaigns matter? Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. INE (2011) Estadística de enseñanza universitaria, 30. 05.2011. Available on line: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft13%2Fp405&file=inebase&L=0. Accessed: 21-X-2011.
  19. Intelligence Compass (2010) Informe sobre Política y redes sociales. On line: http://intelligencecompass.com/images/Informe%20Pol%C3%ADticos%20y%20Redes%20Sociales.pdf (Accessed 23-XII-2010).
  20. Jaeger, P. T., Paquette, S., & Simmons, S. N. (2010). ‘Information Policy in National Political Campaigns: A Comparison of the 2008 Campaigns for President of the United States and Prime Minister of Canada’. Journal of Information Technology Politics, 7(1), 67–82.Google Scholar
  21. Lassen, David S., and Brown, Adam R. (2010). ‘Twitter: The Electoral Connection?’ Social Science Computer Review, 29(4): 419–436.Google Scholar
  22. Martínez Nicolás, Manuel, 2007: “Agitación en el campo. Nueve ideas para la investigación sobre comunicación política en España”, Política y sociedad, vol. 44 (2), 2007, pp. 209–227Google Scholar
  23. Martínez Fuentes, Guadalupe (2008) ‘Local Political Leadership in Spain’, Local Government Studies,30 (2) : 267–278Google Scholar
  24. Martínez Fuentes, Guadalupe and Ortega Villodres, Carmen (2010a) ‘The political leadership factor in the Spanish Local Elections’, Lex Localis, Journal of Local Self-Government, 8 (2): 147–160.Google Scholar
  25. Martínez Fuentes, Guadalupe and Ortega Villodres, Carmen (2010b) ‘Las elecciones municipales de 2007 en Andalucia. Un estudio del comportamiento electoral de los andaluces’, Psicología Política, núm. 41:7–25.Google Scholar
  26. Mouritzen, Paul. E. M. and Svara, James H. (2002), Leadership at Apex. Politicians and administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburg, Pittsburg University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Molins, Joaquim M. and Pardos, Sergi (2005) ‘Las elecciones municipales de 2003 en Cataluña. El ruido contra la estructura: lo global y lo local’, in Francisco Llera and Pablo Oñate (eds) Política comparada. Entre lo local y lo global. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, pp. 91–118.Google Scholar
  28. Montabes Pereira, Juan and Ortega Villodres, Carmen (2011) ‘Identificación partidista y voto: las elecciones autonómicas en Andalucía (2004–2008)’, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 134:27–54.Google Scholar
  29. Natera, Antonio. (2001) El liderazgo político en las sociedades democráticas. Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y ConstitucionalesGoogle Scholar
  30. Observatorio Nacional de las Telecomunicaciones y de la Sociedad de la Información (ONTSI). (2011). Las Redes Sociales en Internet. ONTSI: Madrid.Google Scholar
  31. Petrocik, John R. (1996) ‘Issue ownership in presidential elections with a 1980 case study’. American Journal of Political Science, 4 (3): 825–850.Google Scholar
  32. Pole, Antoinette, and Xenos, Michael. (2011). ‘Like, Comments, and Retweets: Facebooking and Tweeting on the 2010 Gubernatorial Campaign Trail’. Proceedings of the State Politics and Policy Conference 2011.Google Scholar
  33. Scher, Richard. K. (1997) The modern political campaign: Mudslinging, bombast and the Vitality of American Politics. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  34. Steger, Wayne, Williams, Christine & Andolina, Molly (2010) ‘Political Use of Social Networks in 2008’. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington DC. Google Scholar
  35. Tumasjan, Andranik, Sprenger, Timm O., Sandner, Philipp G., and Welpe, Isabell M. (2011). ‘Electoral Forecast with Twitter. What 140 Characters Reveal the Political Landscape’. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4) 402–418.Google Scholar
  36. Vanaclocha, Francisco (2005): “Los liderazgos en el mercado electoral”, in A. Natera & F. Vanaclocha (eds.), Los Liderazgos en el Mercado Político y en la Gestión Pública, Madrid: Universidad Carlos III, 85–108.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, Christine B. and Gulati, Girish J. (2009) ‘Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and Congressional elections 2006, 2008’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, Christine B. and Gulati, Girish J. (2010). ‘Communicating with Constituents in 140 Characters or Less: Twitter and the Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the United States Congress’. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Google Scholar
  39. Yannas, Prodromos, Kleftodimos, Alexandros and Lappas, Georgios (2011) ‘Online Political Marketing in 2010 Greek Local Elections: The Shift from Web to Web 2.0 Campaigns’. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Corporate and Marketing Communications, Athens.Google Scholar
  40. Zittel, Thomas (2007) ‘Lost in Technology? Political Parties and Online-Campaigning in Mixed Member Electoral Systems’. Paper for ECPR General Conference, panel on party organisations and new information and communication technologies (ICTs), Pisa.Google Scholar
  41. Zittel, Thomas (2009) ‘Lost in Technology? Political Parties and Online Campaigning in Germany’s Mixed Member Electoral System’, Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6 (3/4): 298–311.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Ignacio Criado
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guadalupe Martínez-Fuentes
    • 2
  • Aitor Silván
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International RelationsUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Edificio de Ciencias Jurídicas, Políticas y EconómicasCantoblancoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Political Science and Public AdministrationUniversidad de Granada, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y SociologíaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations