Advertisement

Quarks, Hadron Spectroscopy and Beyond

  • J. Weyers
Chapter
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 39)

Abstract

From the marvellous experimental discoveries 1) and theoretical breakthroughs 2) of the last few years has emerged a relatively coherent picture of the world of elementary particles. The “popular mythology” to which most physicists would adhere today can be summarized as follows.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Footnotes

  1. 1).
    For a review see the lectures by J. Ellis, L. Lederman, C. Llewellyn-Smith, J. Steinberger and B. Wiik, these Proceedings and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    C.N. Yang and R.J. Hills, Phys. Rev. 96, 191 (1954). G. ’t Hooft, Nuclear Phys. B35, 167 (1971 S.L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2, 1285 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3).
    We assume that the heavy lepton T- is accompanied by its own neutrino. For a discussion of this point see the lectures by J. Ellis and B. Wiik in these Proceedings. The discovery of the T- is due to M. Perl et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 1489 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    We assume of course that the new quark which builds up the Y(9.6) appears in three colours. For the discovery of the Y(9.6) see the lectures by L. Lederman in these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B47, 365 (1973). D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D8, 3497 (1973). S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 31, 494 (1973).Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    For a review of the problem and possible solutions see, e.G., F. Englert, lectures in these Proceedings; D. Gross, lectures in these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 19 1264 (1967). A. Salam, Proc. 8th Nobel Symposium, Stockholm 1966 (ed. N. Svartholm).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    R. Brout and F. Englert, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 321 (1964). P.W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 132 (1964). G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 585 (1964)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    I ignore the so called “dynamical” symmetry breaking mechanism where the elementary scalar particle of reference 8) is replaced by a bound state. To the best of my knowledge no coherent formulation of this appealing idea exists as yet.Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B70, 39 (1974); B78, 1 (1974); Phys. Letters 49B, 52 (1974).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11).
    For a recent review, see e.G. P. Fayet et S. Ferrara, Phys. Reports 32C, 249 (1977).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    The problem of incorporating a U(n) internal symmetry may have been solved by M. Kaku, P.K. Townsend and P. Van Nieuwenhuizen Phys. Rev. Letters 39, 1109 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13).
    The only theoretical relation between leptons and quarks, at present, is through the so-calles “anomaly” of S.L. Adler, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969). J.S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento 51A, 47 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14).
    For recent reviews see e.G. H. Fritzsch Lectures given at the International Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics, Bielefeld, Germany (1976), to be published. M.S. Chanowitz, J. Ellis and M.K. Gaillard, CERN preprint TH 2312 (1977) and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    See e.G. K. Igi FNAL preprint (1977).Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    J.Goldstone, Nuovo Cimento 19 15 (1961).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17).
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D7, 2887 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18).
    For an extremely lucid discussion see R.J. Crewther, CERN preprint TH 2350 (1977).Google Scholar
  19. 19).
    G. Zweig, unpublished. J. Iizuka, Supplement to Progress of Theoret. Phys. 37–38, 21 (1966). S. Okubo, Phys. Lett. 4, 14 (1963).Google Scholar
  20. 20).
    See e. g. the lectures by J. Ellis, these Proceedings where references can be found.Google Scholar
  21. 21).
    See e. g. B.W. Lee in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies, W.T. Kirk Editor, Stanford (1975), and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  22. 22).
    P. Baird et al., Nature 264, 528 (1976). P. Sandars, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies, Hamburg 1977. See also V. Telegdi, lectures in these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  23. 23).
    B.C. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 38, 577 (1977). A. Benvenuti et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 38, 1110 (1977). See also J. Steinberger, lectures in these Proceedings.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24).
    G. Zweig, CERN preprints TH 401 and 412 (1964) unpublished. M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Letters 8, 214 (1964). R.H. Dalitz, Les Houches Lectures (1965) ( Gordon and Breach, N.Y. 1965 ).Google Scholar
  25. 25).
    For a review see e. g. J.L. Rosner, Physics Reports 11C (1974) and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  26. 26).
    O.W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 598 (1964). M.Y. Han and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 139 B 1006 (1963). M. Gell-Mann, Quarks CERN preprint TH 1543 (1972).Google Scholar
  27. 27).
    H.J. Melosh, Phys. Rev. D9 1095 (1974). See also reference 25).ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28).
    See e. g. the lectures by C. Llewellyn Smith, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  29. 29).
    J.J. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 1404 (1974). J.E. Augustin et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 1406 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30).
    See e. g. the lectures by B. Wiik, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  31. 31).
    H. Harari, Phys. Letters 60B, 172 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32).
    E. Eichten et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 369 (1975) T. Applequist et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 365 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33).
    See e. g. J.L. Rosner, Physics Reports 11C (1974). A.J.G. Hey and D. Morgan, Rutherford Report RL-77-060/A (1977). K. Lanius in Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Conference on High Energy Physics Tbilisi (1976).Google Scholar
  34. 34).
    G.F. Chew, LBL-5391 report (1976).Google Scholar
  35. 35).
    D. Horn and J.E. Mandula, Caltech preprint (1977). M. Bander, G.L. Shaw, P. Thomas and S. Meshkov, Phys. Rev. Letters 36, 695 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36).
    See e. g. J.L. Rosner, Physics Reports 11C (1974).Google Scholar
  37. 37).
    R.H. Dalitz, Oxford Conference on Baryon Resonances (1976). D. Faiman, J. Rosner and J. Weyers, Nuclear Phys. B57, 45 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38).
    R.H. Dalitz, Les Houches Lectures (1965) (Gordon and Breach, N.Y. 1965). H. Jones, R.H. Dalitz and R.R. Horgan, Nuclear Phys. B129, 45 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39).
    M.K. Gaillard, B.W. Lee and J.L. Rosner, Rev. of Mod. Phys. 47, 277 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40).
    E.G. Gazzoli et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 1125 (1975). See also the lectures by J. Ellis for further references.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41).
    See e. g. A.J.G. Hey and D. Morgan reference 33).Google Scholar
  42. 42).
    W.A. Bardeen, H. Fritzsch and M. Gell-Mann in “Scale and Donformal Symmetry in Hadron Physics”, J. Wiley and Sons, New York (1973).Google Scholar
  43. 43).
    It is worth pointing out that we have no information concerning the spin structure of the neutral stuff !Google Scholar
  44. 44).
    A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn, V.F. Weisskopf Phys. Rev. D9, 3471 (1974). A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D10, 2599 (1974). A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, J.Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D12, 2060 11975). P. Gnädig, P. Hasenfratz, J. Kuti, A.S. Szalay, Phys. Lett. Letters 64B, 62 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45).
    G. Preparata and N. Craigie, Nuclear Physics B102, 466 (1976). N. Craigie and G. Preparata, Nucl. Phys. B102, 497 (1976).Google Scholar
  46. 46).
    P.G.O. Freund and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 1645 (1975). R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, Phys. Letters 60B, 201 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47).
    For a derivation of this formula, based on duality see e. g. M. Ademollo, G. Veneziano, S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 83 (1969). R. Brout, F. Englert and C. Truffin, Phys. Letters 29B, 590, 686 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48).
    See e. g. V. Barger in Proceedings of the XVIIth International Conference on High Energy Physics, London (1974).Google Scholar
  49. 49).
    H. Lipkin and S. Meshkov, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 670 (1965).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  50. 50).
    See e. g. U. Karshon et al. Weizmann Institute report WIS 73/ 44 (1974).Google Scholar
  51. 51).
    See e. g. F. Gilman, M. Kugler and S. Meshkov, Phys. Rev. D9 715 (1974). A.J.G. Hey, J.L. Rosner and J. Weyers, Nucl. Phys. 44B, 263 (1973). and references quoted by J.L. Rosner 25).Google Scholar
  52. 52).
    A. Love and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. 45B 507 (1973), F. J. Gilman and I. Karliner, Phys. Rev. D10, 2194 (1974), A.J.G. Hey and J. Weyers, Phys. Letters 40B, 69 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53).
    H.J. Lipkin, Phys. Reports 8C (1973) pointed out that these parametrizations correspond to the most general single quark transition operator with appropriate quantum numbers.Google Scholar
  54. 54).
    See e. g. D. Faiman, J.L. Rosner, Phys. Letters 45B, 357 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55).
    D. Faiman and D.E. Plane, Nuclear Phys. B50, 379 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56).
    A.J.G. Hey, P.J. Litchfield and R.J. Cashmore, Nucl. Phys. B95, 516 (1975) and Nucl. Phys. B98, 237 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57).
    G. Feldman, SLAC PUB (1977).Google Scholar
  58. 58).
    H. Harari in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interaction at High Energies, W.T. Kirk Editor, Stanford (1975).Google Scholar
  59. 59).
    R.P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958).ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  60. 60).
    M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. 125, 1067 (1962).ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  61. 61).
    M. Gell-mann and M. Levy, Nuovo Cimento 16,705 (1960). Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 380 (1960).CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 62).
    S.L. Adler, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 1051 (1965). W.I. Weisberger, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 1047 (1965).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63).
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D11, 3583 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  64. 64).
    G.’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. D14, 3432 (1976). See, however, reference 18).ADSGoogle Scholar
  65. 65).
    M. Gell-Mann, R. Oakes and B. Renner, Phys. Rev. 175, 2195 (1968). R. Carlitz, D. Heckathorn, J. Kaur and W.K. Tung, Phys. Rev. D11, 1234 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 66).
    N. Fuchs, Purdue University Preprint (1976).Google Scholar
  67. 67).
    See e. g. D.C. Moir, R.J. Jacob and G.E. Hite, Nucl. Phys. B 103, 477 (1976). P. Gensini, SLAC PUB, 1944–1945–1967 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68).
    J.F. Gunion, P.C. Mc Namee and M.D. Scadron, SLAC-PUB 1847 (1976).Google Scholar
  69. 69).
    J. Jersak and J. Stern, Nucl. Phys. B7, 413 (1968), K. Bardakei and M.B. Halpern, Phys. Rev. 176, 1686 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70).
    See e. g. H. Leutwyler Springer Tracts in Modern Physics 50, 29 (1969). H. Sazdjian and J. Stern, Nucl. Phys. B94, 163 (1975). J. Kogut and D. Soper, Phys. Rev. D1 2901 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71).
    M. Gell-Mann in Strong and Weak Interactions - Present Problems Academic Press, Inc. New York (1966). K. Bardakei and G. Segré, Phys. Rev. 153 (1967). S. Fubini and G. Furlan, Physics, 1, 299 (1965).Google Scholar
  72. 72).
    R. Dashen and N. Gell-Mann, Phys. Letters 17, 142 (1965).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  73. 73).
    See e. g. J.S. Bell, Acta Phys. Austriaca, Suppl. 13 395 (1974). and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  74. 74).
    H. Leutwyler, Phys. Letters 48B, 431 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75).
    See e. g. T. Das et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 759 (1967). S.L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 224 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76).
    R. Dashen, Phys. Rev. 183, 1245 (1969). See also P. Langacker and H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. D8, 4620 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  77. 77).
    G. Segrè and J. Weyers, Phys. Letters 62B, 91 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78).
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters: see also Ref. 17).Google Scholar
  79. 79).
    J. Kuti, Lectures given at the CERN-JINR School of Physics (1977).Google Scholar
  80. 80).
    P.N. Bogoliukov, Ann. Inst. Poincaré 8, 163 (1967).Google Scholar
  81. 81).
    C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D14, 2362 (1976).ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  82. 82).
    R.L. Jaffe, Oxford Conference on Baryon Resonances (1976). K. Johnson, Scottish Universities, Summer School (1976). and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  83. 83).
    By this we mean a resonance with JPC unaccessible to a \(\bar Q\) Q system.Google Scholar
  84. 84).
    See e. g. J. Kuti, reference 79 and A.J.G. Hey, Phenomenological Aspects of the MIT Bag (Southampton 1977 ).Google Scholar
  85. 85).
    T. Applequist et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 365 (1975). T.A. De Grand, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson and J. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D12, 2060 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  86. 86).
    T.A. De Grand, Ann. Phys. 101, 496 (1976). A.J.G. Hey, B.R. Holstein and D.P. Sidhu (Southampton 1977 ).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87).
    J. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D8, 1240 (1973). H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Letters 32, 438 (1974). H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. 93, 222 (1975). F. Gürsey and P. Sikine, Phys. Letters 60B, 177 (1976) and Phys. Rev. Letters 36, 775 (1976). M. Abud, F. Buccella, H. Ruegg and C.A. Savoy, Phys. Letters 67B, 313 (1977). M. Yoshimura, preprint (1977). K. Inoue et al., preprint (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88).
    J. Steinberger, lectures in these Proceedings. For SU(2)L \( \otimes\) SU(2)R see e. g. H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Nucl. Phys. B103, 61 (1976). R.N. Mohapatra and J.C. Pati, Phys. Rev. D11, 566, 2558 (1975). A. de Rujula, H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, HUTP-77/A029 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89).
    For SU(3) \( \otimes\)U(1) see e. g. G. Segré and J. Weyers, Phys. Letters 63B, 99 (1977). B.W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 38, 1237 (1977). P. Langacker and G. Segré, Phys. Rev. Letters 39, 259 (1977), and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  90. 90.)
    M. Kobayashi and K. Maskawa, Progress of Theoret. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).Google Scholar
  91. 91).
    See e. g. P. Langacker, Phys. Rev. D15, 2386 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  92. 92).
    V. Telegdi, Lectures in these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  93. 93).
    C. Leroy and J. Pestieau, Louvain Preprint (1977).Google Scholar
  94. 94).
    See e. g. A. Duncan, P. Schattner, Phys. Rev. D7, 1861 (1973). D.Z. Freedam, W. Kummer, Phys. Rev. D7, 1829 (1973). The reason is of course clear: the mass of the Z° simply plays the role of the cut-off in the Feynman-Speisman calculation. (Phys. Rev. 94, 500 (1954).ADSGoogle Scholar
  95. 95).
    S.Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. D7, 3750 (1973). J. Lieberman, Phys. Rev. D9, 1749 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  96. 96).
    M. de Crombrugghe, H. Haut, J. Weyers, Phys. Letters 71B, 400 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97).
    S. Weinberg, quoted by H. Fritzsch, next paper. H. Fritzsch, Phys. Letters 70B, 436 (1977). A. de Rujula, H. Georgi, S.L. Glashow HUTP 77/A029 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98).
    The usual procedure to guarantee the proton’s stability is through superheavy bosons. This is probably not a self consistent procedure (see ref. 99). An interesting alternative is to make the proton absolutely stable by a global U(1) symmetry. See P. Langacker, G. Segré and A. Weldon, UPR-0082 T, (1977) and references quoted therein.Google Scholar
  99. 99).
    Mass ratios of the gauge bosons cannot be made arbitrarily large as shown by E. Gildener, Phys. Rev. D14, 1667 (1976).Google Scholar
  100. 100).
    e. g. M. Hamermesh, “Group Theory and its Applications to Physical Problems” (Addison-Wesley, 1962 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Weyers
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LouvainLouvain-La-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations