Advertisement

Velocity of Indentation as a Variable in Tactile Sensation

  • Dan R. KenshaloSr.
  • Joel D. Greenspan
  • Ross Henderson
Chapter
Part of the Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series book series (EMISS, volume 12)

Abstract

Most investigators of tactile sensitivity have assumed that one of the static aspects of the tactile stimulating event, pressure (Weber, 1846) or tension (Meissner, 1859; von Frey and Kiesow, (1899) was the relevant metric that best described the relationship between the stimulating event and the resulting sensation. Recently other investigators (e.g., Harrington and Merzenich, 1970; Knibestöl and Vallbo, 1980; Mountcastle and Darian-Smith, 1968) have used skin indentation depth as the appropriate metric to describe tactile stimuli.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chambers, M. R., Andres, K.H., von Düring, M., Iggo, A. (1972). The structure and function of the slowly adapting type II mechanoreceptor in hairy skin. Quart. J. Exp. Physiol., 57, 417–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Frey, M. von., Kiesow, F. (1899). Über die Function der Tastkorperchen. Z. Psychol. Physiol. Sin., 20, 126–163Google Scholar
  3. Grindley, G.C. (1936). The variation of sensory thresholds with rate of application of the stimulus. I. The differential threshold for pressure. Brit. J. Psychol. 27, 86–95Google Scholar
  4. Harrington, T., Merzenich, M.M. (1970). Neural coding in the sense of touch: Human sensations of skin indentation compare with the responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 100 251–264Google Scholar
  5. Iggo, A., Muir, A.R. (1969). The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin. J. Physiol. ( Lond ). 200, 763–796Google Scholar
  6. Johansson., R.S., Vallbo, A.B. (1979). Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand. J. Physiol. ( Lond ). 29, 405–422Google Scholar
  7. Jones, F.N. (1960). Subjective intensity functions in somesthesis. In Symposium on Cutaneous Sensitivity (ed. G. R. Hawkes ). U.S. Army Med. Res. Lab. Ft. Knox, KYGoogle Scholar
  8. Knibestöl, M., (1973). Stimulus-response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 232, 427–452PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Knibestö1, M., (1975). Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J. Physiol.(Lond.) 245, 63–80Google Scholar
  10. Knibestö1, M., Vallbo, Å.B. (1980). Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. J. Physiol. ( Lond. ) 300, 251–268Google Scholar
  11. Lindblom, U. (1974). Touch perception threshold in human glabrous skin in terms of displacement amplitude on stimulation with single mechanical pulses. Brain Res. 82, 205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meissner, G. (1859). Untersuchungen über den Tastsinn. Z. Nat. Med. Grundlagenforschun. 7, 92–119Google Scholar
  13. Mountcastle, V.B., Darian-Smith, I. (1968). Neural mechanisms in somesthesia. In Medical Physiology (ed. V.B. Mountcastle) C.B. Mosby, St. Louis, MoGoogle Scholar
  14. Nafe, J.P., Wagoner, K.S. (1941a). The nature of sensory adaptation. J. Gen.Psychol. 25, 295–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nafe, J.P., Wagoner, K.S. (1941b). The nature of pressure adaptation. 25, 323–351Google Scholar
  16. Pubols, B.H. Jr., Pubols, L.M., (1976). Coding of mechanical stimulus velocity and indentation depth by squirrel monkey and raccoon glabrous skin mechanoreceptors. J. Neurophysiol. 39, 773–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pubols, L.M., Pubols, B.H. Jr., Munger, B.L., (1971). Functional properties of mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin of the raccoon’s forepaw. Exp. Neural., 31, 165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Törebjork, H.E., Ochoa, J., (1980). Specific sensations evoked by activity in single identified sensory units in man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 110, 445–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vallbo, Å.B., (1981). Sensations evoked from the glabrous skin of the human hand by electrical stimulation of unitary mechanosensitive afferents. Brain Res., 215, 359–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vallbo, Å.B., Johansson, R., (1976). Skin mechanoreceptors in the human hand: Neuronal and psychophysical thresholds: An inference of some population properties. In Sensory Functions of the Skin of Primates. (ed. Y. Zotterman ). Pergamon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Weber, E.H. (1846). Der Tastsinn and das Gemeingefühl. Wagner’s Handwörterbuch der Physiologie. 3, 481–588Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Wenner-Gren Center 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan R. KenshaloSr.
    • 1
  • Joel D. Greenspan
    • 2
  • Ross Henderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and the Psychobiology Research CenterFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of North Carolina, School of MedicineChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations