Advertisement

Size Perception and Localisation of Sensations from Single Mechanoreceptive Units in Man

  • W. J. L. Schady
  • H. E. Torebjörk
  • J. L. Ochoa
Chapter
Part of the Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series book series (EMISS, volume 12)

Abstract

In assessing the functional role played by individual mecha-noreceptive unit types in sensation, it is not sufficient to study the organisation and physiology of their cutaneous endings. Such characteristics as receptor response properties and unit innervation density define the quality and quantity of the raw inflow from cutaneous mechanoreceptors. But all perceptual experience is the result of cortical processing of afferent signals, and central rather than peripheral factors may determine which signals are given priority. Some inputs may be enhanced at successive relay stations, some may be inhibited and some may be entirely prevented from reaching consciousness, while still playing a role e.g. in proprioception. Psychophysical methods in combination with microneurography are therefore necessary in order to establish how the human brain deals with single unit somatic inputs: whether, for instance, signals from all mechanoreceptor types and from all skin regions are given equal treatmen.t

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gardner, E.P., Spencer, W.A. (1972). Sensory funneling. II. Cortical neuronal representation of patterned cutaneous stimuli. J. Neurophysiol., 35, 954–977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamburger, H.L., (1980). Locognosia. MD Thesis, University of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johansson, R.S., Vallbo, Å.B., (1980). Spatial properties of the population of mechanoroceptive units in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Brain Res., 184, 353–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    KnibestöI, M., Vallbo, Å.B., (1970). Single unit analysis of mechanoreceptive activity from the human glabrous skin. Acta Physiol. Scand., 80, 178–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mountcastle, V.B., Powell, T.S., (1959). Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 105, 201–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noordenbos, W., (1972). The sensory stimulus and the verbalisation of the response: the pain problem. In Neurophysiology studied in man. (ed. J.J. Somjen ). Excerpta AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ochoa, J.L., Torebjörk, H.E., (1983). Sensations evoked by intraneurel microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. J. physiol., 342, 633–654PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schedy, W.J.L., Torebjörk, H.E., (1983). Projected and receptive fields: a comparison of projected areas of sensations evoked by intraneural stimulation of mechanoreceptive units, and their innervation territories. Acta Physiol. Scand., 119, 267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schady, W.J.L., Torebjörk, H.E., Ochoa, J.L., (1983). Cerebral localisation function from the input of single mechanoreceptive units in man. Acta Physiol. Scand., 119, 277–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soininen, K. Järvilehto, T., (1982). Are there somatosensory evoked responses to subliminal tactile stimuli? In Soviet-Finnish Symposium on Psychophysiology, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torebjörk, H.E., Ochoa, J.L. (1980). Specific sensations evoked by activity in single identified sensory units in man. Acta Physiol. Scand., 110, 445–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamauchi, N., Fujitoni, Y., Oikawo, T., (1981). Somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by mechanical and electrical stimulation of the skin. Tohuku J. Exp. Med., 133, 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zealear, D.L., Crandall, W.F., (1982). Stimulating and recording from axons within their myelin sheaths. J. Neurosci. Methods, 5, 27–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Wenner-Gren Center 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. L. Schady
    • 1
  • H. E. Torebjörk
    • 1
  • J. L. Ochoa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical NeurophysiologyUniversity HospitalUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Wisconsin Medical SchoolMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations