Stent Designs and Implantation Techniques

  • Mandeep Singh
  • Verghese Mathew


The introduction of intracoronary stents has significantly influenced the current practice of interventional cardiology. The increase in the use of stents began with the publication of results of the BENESTENT (Belgium Netherlands Stent) and STRESS (Stent Restenosis Study) trials, which demonstrated significant reduction in restenosis rates in patients with discrete stenosis in large native arteries [1,2]. Acute complications of angioplasty, including abrupt vessel closure and emergency coronary bypass surgery, have also been reduced with the use of stents [3]. Similar success with stents has been noted in angiographic subsets of complex lesions (eg, diffuse, tandem, severely calcified, restenotic, thrombotic, or ostial); in total occlusions, bifurcation lesions, saphenous vein grafts, and multivessel interventions, the combination of stenting and abciximab conferred additive long-term benefit with respect to death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization [4].


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fischman DL, Leon MB, Bairn DS, et al.: A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994, 331:496–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al.: A comparison of balloon-expand-able-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994, 331:489–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams DO, Holubkov R, Yeh W, et al.: Percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era compared with 1985–1986: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registries. Circulation 2000, 102:2945–2951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cura FA, Bhatt DL, Lincoff AM, et al.: Pronounced benefit of coronary stent-ing and adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in complex atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation 2000;102:28–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips PS, Alfonso F, Segovia J, et al.: Effects of Palmaz-Schatz stents on angled coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1997, 79:191–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, et al.: Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 2001, 103:2816–2821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al Suwaidi J, Yeh W, Cohen HA, et al.: Immediate and one-year outcome in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions in the modern era (NHLBI dynamic registry). Am J Cardiol 2001, 87:1139–1144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG, et al.: Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent—immediate and follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 35:1145–1151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dean LS: The Gianturco-Roubin II (GR-II) intracoronary stent. In Strategic Approaches in Coronary Intervention. Edited by Ellis SG, Holmes DR Jr. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dean LS, Holmes DR Jr, Roubin GS: One year follow-up: the effect of proper stent size on clinical outcome. Am J Cardiol 1998, 82:69S.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cremonesi A, Benit E, Carlier M, et al.: Multicenter registry to evaluate the efficacy of the NIROYAL stent in de novo or restenotic coronary stenosis. J Invasive Cardiol 2000, 12:225–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kastrati A, Schomig A, Dirschinger J, et al.: Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000, 101:2478–2483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischman DL, Savage MP, Leon MB, et al.: Fate of lesion-related side branches after coronary artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993, 22:1641–1646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pan M, Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, et al.: Follow-up patency of side branches covered by intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stent. Am Heart J 1995, 129:436–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Savage MP, Douglas JS Jr, Fischman DL, et al.: Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1997, 337:740–747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Gregorio J, Moussa I, Adamian M, et al.: The use of IVUS-guided PTCA and spot stenting for the treatment of long lesions: a comparison with traditional stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 35:62A.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilson SH, Berger PB, Mathew V, et al.: Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 35:937–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pentousis D, Guerin Y, Funck F, et al.: Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the MultiLink stent. Am J Cardiol 1998, 82:1437–1440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mandeep Singh
  • Verghese Mathew

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations