Advertisement

Management of Risk and Emergency Preparedness for Future NUI Production Concepts

  • Jan-Erik VinnemEmail author
  • Willy Røed
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

The framework conditions for offshore petroleum oil and gas production in Norway for the coming years are outlined, followed by a brief discussion of future normally unmanned production concepts. Legislation for unmanned installations is reviewed, followed by a discussion of the safety systems that should be installed on future normally unmanned installations. A case study is presented for a fictitious NUI facility, and risk results are presented for three different cases with varying extent of safety systems installed. The case study results are discussed with respect to the risk levels for personnel for these three cases. Finally, some challenges from the risk management point of view for normally unmanned installations are discussed.

References

  1. 1.
    Bye J et al (2018) Study of with new operational concepts in the petroleum industry (in Norwegian only). Safetec report ST-12578-2, 8 February 2018Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Samuelsberg A (2017) Statoil remotely operated factory (ROFTM) safe, high value and low carbon intensity concepts. Equinor, 8 August 2017Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    PSA (2017) Regulations relating to design and outfitting of facilities, etc. in the petroleum activities (the facilities regulations). PSA, Last amended 18 December 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    PSA (2017) Regulations relating to health, safety and the environment in the petroleum activities and at certain onshore facilities (the framework regulations). PSA, last mended 15 December 2017Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO (2003) Analysis, design, installation and testing of basic surface safety systems for offshore production platforms. International Standards Organisation, Geneva. ISO10418:2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norwegian Oil and Gas (2018) 070 application of IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 in the Norwegian petroleum industry (recommended SIL requirements), 26 June 2018Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EU (2014) Equipment for potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX), ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/mechanical-engineering/atex_en
  8. 8.
    Vinnem JE, Pedersen JI, Rosenthal P (1996) Efficient risk management: use of computerized QRA model for safety improvements to an existing installation. In: Presented at SPE 3rd international conference on health, safety and environment, New Orleans, June 1996Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    PSA (2017) Trends in risk levels in the petroleum activity (in Norwegian only), Main report, 26 April 2018. PSAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norwegian Oil and Gas (2013) Recommended guidelines for establishing area-based emergency preparedness, guideline 064 (Rev. 3), 19 March 2013. Norwegian Oil and GasGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fossan I (2016) Modelling of ignition sources on offshore oil and gas facilities—MISOF, Lloyds Register, 25 November 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    PSA (2019). Report of the investigation into the walkway incident on Tambar, 16 January 2019. PSAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aven T, Vinnem JE (2007) Risk management, with applications from the offshore oil and gas industry. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DNV GL (2015) DNV GL-ST-0358 certification of offshore gangways for personnel transfer, December 2015Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    DNV GL (2016) DNV GL-RU-SHIP rules for classification: ships, October 2015, Last amended January 2016Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Standards Norway (2017) R-002 lifting equipment (edition 2017). Standards NorwayGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norwegian Maritime Authority (2016) Requirements regarding transport and accommodation of industrial personnel. Norwegian Maritime Authority, RSV 17–2016, 27 December 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uptime International (2019) Private communication, 18 February 2019Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2018) Decision regarding appeal—Tambar (in Norwegian only), letter to Aker BP, dated 21 November 2018Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacobs T (2016) Industrial-sized cyber attacks threaten the upstream sector. J Pet TechnolGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vinnem JE, Utne IB (2018) Risk from cyberattacks on autonomous ships. In: Presented at ESREL2018, Trondheim, NorwayCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ministry Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2018) Health, safety and environment in the petroleum industry, report (White Paper) to the Storting, Meld. St 12 (2017–2018) https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/258cadcb3cca4e3c87c858fd787e0f75/en-gb/pdfs/stm201720180012000engpdfs.pdf
  23. 23.
    Ministry Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2019) The use of service vessels in the petroleum activity on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, 2 July 2019 https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/e5dbfd19f8be4d81b632405253ce43b0/rapport_flerbruksfartoy.pdf
  24. 24.
    PSA (2019) Changes to the framework regulations, 26 April 2019Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations