Advertisement

Explosion Risk Modelling

  • Jan-Erik VinnemEmail author
  • Willy Røed
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of frequencies for explosion scenarios as well as an overview of different type of explosion consequences. An approach to probabilistic explosion load assessment is outlined, followed by a discussion of how explosion risk may be reduced. Finally an example of dimensioning against blast load and a case study relating to blast load reduction are presented.

References

  1. 1.
    SCI (1998) Blast and fire engineering for topside systems, phase 2. Ascot; SCI, Report no, p 253Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vinnem JE (1998) Blast load frequency distribution, assessment of historical frequencies in the North Sea. Preventor, Bryne, Norway; 1998 Nov. Report no.: 19816–04Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Venart JES (2010) Buncefield: cause and consequences. In: Ale, Papazoglou, Zio (eds) Reliability, risk and safety, Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-60427-7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eckhoff RK (2005) Explosion hazards in the process industries. 1st edn. Gulf Publishing. Company, Houston, 440 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bjerketvedt D, Bakke JR, van Wingerden K (1997) Gas explosion handbook. J Hazard Mater 52(1997):1–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oil and Gas UK (2003) Fire and explosion guidance. Oil and Gas UK, Oct 2003. www.oilandgasuk.co.uk
  7. 7.
    Czujko J (2001) Design of offshore facilities to resist gas explosion hazard. Engineering Handbook, Nowatec.noGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ERA (1998) Fire and explosion engineering, offshore installations—conference proceedings, 1 Dec 1998, ERA Report 98-0958. Leatherhead, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norway Standard (2010) NORSOK Z-013. Risk and emergency preparedness assessment, Standard NorwayGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IOGP (2010) Vulnerability of plant/structure, IOGP Risk Assessment Data Directory, Report No. 434–15, OGP, March 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    PSA (2011) The facilities regulations; Petroleum Safety Authority, Norwegian Pollution Control Authority and the Norwegian Social and Health Directorate, StavangerGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eknes ML and Moan, T. (1996) Modelling of escalation due to explosion. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, 16–20 June 1996, Florence, ItalyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations