Advertisement

Helicopter Transportation Fatality Risk Assessment

  • Jan-Erik VinnemEmail author
  • Willy Røed
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

This presentation starts with a review of accidents and incidents in the UK and Norwegian sectors and presents earlier risk assessments. Risk assessment for the UK sector and Norwegian sector are then presented separately and combined, with a risk assessment for an individual installation presented separately. Finally, some other aspects are discussed, such as the possibility to replace helicopters by vessels and the new EU helicopter regulations.

References

  1. 1.
    Sintef (2010) Helicopter safety study 3 (in Norwegian only). SINTEF; 2010 Nov. Trondheim, Norway; Report No.: SINTEF A14973Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SINTEF (2017) Helicopter safety study 3b (in Norwegian only). SINTEF; 2017 Feb. Trondheim, Norway; Report No.: SINTEF A28021Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norwegian official report (2002) Helicopter safety and the Norwegian continental shelf (in Norwegian only), NOU2002:17, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CAA (2007) Status report from cooperation forum for helicopter safety (in Norwegian only), www.luftfartstilsynet.no
  5. 5.
    AIBN (2018) Report on the air accident near Turøy, Øygarden Municipality, Hordaland county, Norway 29 April 2016 with Airbus Helicopters EC 225LP, LN-OJF, operated by CHC Helikopter Service AS, report SL 2018/04, July 2018Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vinnem JE, Vinnem JE (1998) Risk levels on the norwegian continental shelf. preventor, Bryne, Norway; 1998 Aug. Report No.: 19708–03Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vinnem JE (2008) Challenges in analysing offshore hazards of an operational nature, presented at PSAM9, Hong Kong, 18–23 May 2008Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    HSE (2004) UK offshore public transport helicopter safety record (1976–2002), www.hse.uk.gov
  9. 9.
    Heide B (2012) On helicopter transport risk for offshore petroleum personnel, presented at PSAM/11ESREL2012. Hels, Finl 24–28(6):2012Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    PSA (2012) Trends in risk level on the Norwegian continental shelf, main report, (in Norwegian only, English summery report). Pet Saf Auth Stavanger 25(4):2012Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    SINTEF (1990) Helicopter safety study. SINTEF; 1990 Nov. Trondheim, Norway; Report No.: STF75 A90008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    SINTEF (1999) Helicopter safety study 2 (in Norwegian only). SINTEF; 1999 Nov. Trondheim, Norway; Report No.: STF38 A99423Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamremoen E (2007) Personal communication with Mr Hamremoen in Statoil (now Equinor)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karlsen K (2007) Personal communication with Mr Karlsen, Industry EnergyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vinnem JE (2016) Helicopter safety can probably not be better, time to consider boat transport (press article in Norwegian only). Stavanger Aftenblad 19(05):2016Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Safetec Nordic (2016) Consequence study of possible regulation changes for offshore helicopter operations (in Norwegian only), Report ST-11926-2, 16.12.2016Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lovdata (2018) Regulations for offshore helicopter operations (in Norwegian only), FOR-2018-06-20-923, 21.6.2018, Ministry of TransportationGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Safetec Nordic (2012) Safety study of land-based helicopters (in Norwegian only), Report ST-04215-2, 12.02.2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations