Personas in Use

  • Lene NielsenEmail author
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


Whether you work with user journeys, user stories, use cases, scenarios, wire frames, or any other tool that helps you imagine a future system or product, your aim is to understand how different people are going to interact with it.


  1. Abbott HP (2002) The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrechtsen C, Pedersen M, Pedersen NF, Jensen TW (2016) Proposing co-design of personas as a method to heighten validity and engage users: a case from higher education. Int J Sociotechnology Knowl Dev 8(4):55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander IF, Maiden N (2004) Scenarios, stories, use cases. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Bliss D (2000) Narrative scenarios as a design tool. Retrieved Jan 27, 2019, from
  5. Blythe M (2014) The hitchhiker’s guide to ubicomp: using techniques from literary and critical theory to reframe scientific agendas. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18(4):795–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blythe M, Encinas E (2018) Research fiction and thought experiments in design. Found. Trends Hum-Comput Inter 12(1):1–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bordwell D (1997) Narration in the fiction film. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt E, Grunnet C (2000) Evoking the future: drama and props in user centered design. In: Proceedings of participatory design conference (PDC 2000). New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks P (1984) Reading for the plot—design and intention in narrative. Harvard University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruner J (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Buxton B, Marquardt N, Greenberg S, Carpendale S (2012) Sketching user experiences: the workbook. Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  12. Bødker S (2000) Scenarios in user-centred design—setting the stage for reflection and action. Interact Comput 13(1):61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bødker S, Christiansen E (1994) Scenarios as springboards in design of CSCW. DAIMI Rep Ser 23(488):1–16Google Scholar
  14. Bødker S, Ehn P, Sjögren D, Sundblad Y (2000) Co-operative design—perspectives on 20 years with ‘the Scandinavian IT Design Model’. Stockholm: NordiChiGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll JM (2000) Making use—scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang, Y. Lim, Y. & Stolterman, E. (2008). Personas: from theory to practices. In: Proceedings of building bridges. ACM, pp 439–442Google Scholar
  17. Clausen H (1993) Narratives as tools for the system designer. Des Stud 14(3):283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cobley P (2001) Narrative. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohn M (2004) User stories applied: for agile software development. Pearson Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooper A (2003) The origin of personas. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from
  21. Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D (2007) About face 3.0: the essentials of interaction design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Coplan, A. (2011). Understanding empathy: its features and effects. In: Empathy. Oxford University Press, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  23. Djajadiningrat JP, Gaver WW, Frens JW (2000) Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. ACM, New York, pp 66–71Google Scholar
  24. Ducatel K, Bogdanowicz M (2001) ISTAG—scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from
  25. Erickson T (1995) Notes on design practice: stories and prototypes as catalysts for communication. In: Caroll JM (ed) Scenario-based design—envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, pp 37–59Google Scholar
  26. Floyd IR, Jones CM, Twidale MB (2008) Resolving incommensurable debates: a preliminary identification of persona kinds, attributes, and characteristics. Artifact 2(1):12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fludernik M (1996) Towards a natural narratology. Routledge, London/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hasdogan G (1996) The role of user models in product design for assessment of user needs. Des Stud 17:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hasdogan G (1997) Scenario-building in the product design process. In McGrory p (ed) The challenge of complexity. University of Arts and Design, UIAH, Helsinki, pp 134–141Google Scholar
  30. Heijden K (1996) Scenarios—the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard S, Carroll J, Murphy J, Peck J (2002) Using ‘endowed props’ in scenario-based design. In: Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (NordiCHI ’02). ACM, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  32. Iser W (2000) The reading process: a phenomenological approach. In: Lodge D, Wood N (eds) Modern criticism and theory: a reader. Harlow, Pearson Education, pp 188–205Google Scholar
  33. Jarke M (1999) Scenarios for modeling. Communication of the ACM 42(1):47–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karat C-M, Karat J (1992) Some dialogues on scenarios. SIGCHI Bull 24(4):7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kvale S (1996) InterViews—an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Kyng M (1992) Scenario? Guilty! SIGCHI Bull 24(4):8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larsen SE (2002) Narratology and narrative: history and perspective. Almen Semiotik 16:130–145Google Scholar
  38. Lave J (1988) Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Madsen S, Nielsen L (2008) An empirical study of the inventive aspects of narrative scenarios in IT redesign. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from
  40. Madsen S, Nielsen L (2009) Using storytelling to improve scenarios. In: IADIS International conference information systems, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  41. Madsen S, Nielsen L (2010) Exploring persona-scenarios—using story-telling to create design ideas. In: Katre D, Orngreen R, Yammiyavar P, Clemmensen T (eds) Human work interaction design, usability in social, cultural and organizational contexts. Springer, Germany, pp 57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matthews T, Judge T, Whittaker S (2012) How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? The 2012 ACM annual conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1219–1228Google Scholar
  43. McGraw KL, Harbison K (1997) User-centered requirements: the scenario-based engineering process. Lawrence Earlbaum ass, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  44. Mikkelson N, Lee WO (2000) Incorporating user archetypes into scenario-based design. In: 9th Annual Usability Professionals’ Association (UPA) conference. Asheville, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  45. Mulder S, Yaar Z (2006) The user is always right: a practical guide to creating and using personas for the web. New Riders Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  46. Nardi BA (1992) The use of scenarios in design. SIGCHI Bull 24(4):13–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nardi BA (1996) Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated actions models, and distributed cognition. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 69–102Google Scholar
  48. Nielsen L (2004) Engaging personas and narrative scenarios. Samfundslitteratur, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  49. Nielsen L (2011) Personas in co-creation and co-design. In: Proceedings of the 11th human-computer interaction research symposium (DHRS2011), pp 38–40Google Scholar
  50. Nielsen L, Hansen KS (2014) Personas is applicable—a study on the use of personas in Denmark. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, pp 1665–1674Google Scholar
  51. Nielsen L, Nielsen KS (2013) Personas—from poster to performance. In: Melkas H, Buur J (ed) Proceedings of the participatory innovation conference—PIN-C 2013. Lappeenranta, vol 1, pp 273–270Google Scholar
  52. Polkinghorne DE (1988) Narrative knowing and the human sciences. University of New York Press/Association for Computing Machinery, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Potts C (1995) Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs. In: Olson GM, Schuon S (eds) Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques (DIS ‘95), ACM, New York, pp 247–256Google Scholar
  54. Pruitt J, Adlin T (2006) The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  55. Pruitt J, Grudin J (2003) Personas: practice and theory. Retrieved September 25, 2018, from
  56. Putnam C, Kolko B, Wood S (2012) Communicating about users in ICTD: leveraging HCI personas. In: The fifth international conference on information and communication technologies and development. ACM, New York, pp 338–349Google Scholar
  57. Quesenbury W (2006) Storytelling and narrative. The personas lifecycle. Elsevier, San Francisco, pp 520–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reason B, Løvlie L, Flu BM (2015) Service design for business: a practical guide to optimizing the customer experience. WileyGoogle Scholar
  59. Reisner D (1992) Further uses of “scenarios”. SIGCHI Bull 24(4):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2002) Scenario-based usability engineering. Tutorial, London (DIS 2002)Google Scholar
  61. Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign—Int J CoCreation Des Arts 4(1):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schank RC (1990) Tell me a story: a new look at real and artificial memory. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharrock W, Anderson B (1994) The user as a scenic feature of the design space. Des Stud 15(1):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Simsarian KT (2003) Take It to the next stage: the roles of role playing in the design process. In: CHI ‘03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA ’03). ACM, New York, pp 1012–1013Google Scholar
  65. Suri JF, Marsh M (2000) Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Applied Ergonomics 31(2):151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sutcliffe A (2003) Scenarios, models and the design process in software engineering and interactive systems design. In: HCI design (Department of Computation, Manchester)Google Scholar
  67. Vorre Hansen A (2009) Personas nu og fremover. Retrieved from Accessed 24 Sep 2018
  68. Young RM, Barnard PJ (1992) Multiple users of scenarios: a reply to Campbell. SIGCHI Bull 24(4):10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business ITIT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations