Advertisement

DOE: Response Surface Methods

  • Theodore T. Allen
Chapter

Abstract

Response surface methods (RSM) are primarily relevant when the decision-maker desires (1) to create a relatively accurate prediction of engineered system input-output relationships and (2) to “tune” or optimize thoroughly of the system being designed. Since these methods require more runs for a given number of factors than screening using fractional factorials, they are generally reserved for cases in which the importance of all factors is assumed, perhaps because of previous experimentation.

References

  1. Allen TT, Yu L, Schmitz J (2003) The expected integrated mean squared error experimental design criterion applied to die casting machine design. J R Stat Soc, Ser C: App Stat 52:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Box GEP, Behnken DW (1960) Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 30:1–40MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Box GEP, Draper NR (1987) Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Roy Stat Soc B 13:1–45MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Choudhury AK (1997) Study of the effect of die casting machine upon die deflections. Master’s thesis, Industrial & Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  6. Myers R, Montgomery D (2001) Response surface methodology, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial and Systems EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations