Advertisement

Microclimate: Rediscovering an Old Concept in the Aetiology of Pressure Ulcers

  • Michael Clark
Chapter

Abstract

That changes of local skin temperature and relative humidity may play a part in predisposing people to pressure ulcer development has long been recognized but perhaps overlooked due to the strong focus upon pressure redistribution. Around 2010 interest has grown in the microclimate and its management within pressure ulcer prevention. There is limited data upon which to base firm conclusions around whether modifying the microclimate influences pressure ulcer development. There is growing data that local skin cooling may reduce the hyperaemic response following unloading while altering some aspects of cytokine production. However these potentially beneficial effects of skin cooling may reduce the patient’s experience and quality of life. Skin-mattress relative humidity may be higher among patients who later develop superficial sacral pressure ulcers compared with other patients who do not develop these injuries. However interpretation of this data is compounded by the wide intra- and inter- individual differences in microclimate parameters. There is a growing need for increased communication between textile and pressure ulcer researchers if progress is to be made in elucidating the role (if any) of the microclimate in pressure ulcer prevention.

References

  1. 1.
    National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline. Washington, DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. In: Haesler E, editor. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline. Osborne Park, WA: Cambridge Media; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    International review. Pressure ulcer prevention: pressure, shear, friction and microclimate in context. A consensus document. London: Wounds International. 2010. http://www.woundsinternational.com/clinical-guidelines/international-review-pressure-ulcer-prevention-pressure-shear-friction-and-microclimate-in-context Accessed 22 Dec 2014.
  4. 4.
    Roaf R. The causation and prevention of bed sores. J Tissue Viability. 2006;16(2):6–8. Reprinted from Bedsore Biomechanics, McMillan Press, 1976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark M, Cullum N. Matching patient need for pressure sore prevention with the supply of pressure redistributing mattresses. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17(3):310–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Welch G. Interface pressure measurement. Decubitus. 1989;2(4):8–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rondorf-Klym LM, Langemo D. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum. Decubitus. 1993;6(1):22–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whittemore R, Bautista C, Smith C, Bruttomesso K. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions. J ET Nurs. 1993;20(3):111–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Defloor T. The effects of position and mattress on interface pressure. Appl Nurs Res. 2000;13(1):2–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott EM, Baker EA, Kelly PJ, Stoddard EJ, Leaper DJ. Measurement of interface pressures in the evaluation of operating theatre mattresses. J Wound Care. 1999;8(9):437–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark M, Black J. Skin IQ™ Microclimate manager—made easy. http://www.woundsinternational.com/pdf/content_9818.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2014.
  12. 12.
    Randall DJ, Eckert R. Animal physiology: mechanisms and adaptations. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Freeman WH; 1983.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Du Bois EF. The basal metabolism in fever. J Am Med Assoc. 1921;77(5):352–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayrovitz HN, Sims N. Biophysical effects of water and synthetic urine on skin. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001;14(6):302–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brienza DM, Geyer MJ. Using support surfaces to manage tissue integrity. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005;18:151–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerhardt LC, Strässle V, Lenz A, et al. Influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5(28):1317–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu KS, van Osdol WW, Dauskardt RH. Mechanical properties of human stratum corneum: effects of temperature, hydration, and chemical treatment. Biomaterials. 2006;27(5):785–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gefen A. How do microclimate factors affect the risk for superficial pressure ulcers: a mathematical modeling study. J Tiss Viab. 2011;20(3):81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Verhonick PJ, Lewis DW, Goller HO. Thermography in the study of decubitus ulcers: preliminary report. Nurs Res. 1972;21(3):233–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newman P, Davis PH. Thermography as a predictor of sacral pressure sores. Age Ageing. 1981;10(1):14–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trandel RS, Lewis DW, Verhonick PJ. Thermographical investigation of decubitus ulcers. Bull Prosthet Res. 1975;10(10–24):137–55.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Norton D, McLaren R, Exton-Smith AN. An investigation of geriatric nursing problems in hospital. Edinburgh, NY: Churchill-Livingstone; 1975.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sprigle S, Linden M, McKenna D, et al. Clinical skin temperature measurement to predict incipient pressure ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001;14(3):133–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clark M. The aetiology of superficial sacral pressure sores. In: Leaper D, Cherry G, Dealey C, Lawrence J, Turner T, editors. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management. Amsterdam: McMillan Press; 1996. p. 167–70.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    West J, Hopf H, Szaflarski N. The effects of a unique alternating-pressure mattress on tissue perfusion and temperature. In: 5th Annual meeting of the European tissue repair society. Padua: ETRS; 1995.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kokate JY, Leland KJ, Held AM, Hansen GL, Kveen GL, Johnson BA, Wilke MS, Sparrow EM, Iaizzo PA. Temperature-modulated pressure ulcers: a porcine model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(7):666–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lachenbruch C. Skin cooling surfaces: estimating the importance of limiting skin temperature. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005;51(2):70–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee B, Benyajati S, Woods JA, Jan YK. Effect of local cooling on pro-inflammatory cytokines and blood flow of the skin under surface pressure in rats: feasibility study. J Tiss Viab. 2014;23(2):69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jan YK, Liao F, Rice LA, Woods JA. Using reactive hyperemia to assess the efficacy of local cooling on reducing sacral skin ischemia under surface pressure in people with spinal cord injury: a preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(10):1982–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Panel on the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Adults. Pressure Ulcers in Adults. Prediction and prevention: clinical practice guideline number 3. AHCPR Publication No. 92-0047. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1992.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Black J, Berke C, Urzendowski G. Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012;39(3):267–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Williamson R, Lachenbruch C, VanGilder C. A laboratory study examining the impact of linen use on low-air-loss support surface heat and water vapor transmission rates. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2013;59(8):32–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhong W, Xing MM, Pan N, Maibach HI. Textiles and human skin, microclimate, cutaneous reactions: an overview. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2006;25(1):23–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Welsh Wound Innovation CentreRhondda Cynon Taf, WalesUK

Personalised recommendations