Advertisement

Cranioplasty

  • Christopher J. WhiteEmail author
  • Michael Perry
  • Kevin Tsang
Chapter
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Cranioplasty is the surgical repair of a defect or deformity of the skull. Historically, many techniques have been developed and tried, with variable success. More recently there has been a move towards the use of computer-generated custom prostheses, fabricated from either titanium or polymers. Nevertheless, there is still a role for autogenous materials. Cranioplasty is not a risk-free procedure, and therefore case selection, planning and surgical technique must be carried out to the highest degree of precision. Some of the more important factors and choice of materials are discussed in this chapter.

Keywords

Cranioplasty Cranial defect Skull 

Suggested Reading

  1. Arun Kumar KV, Singla NK, Gowda ME, Kumar D, Legha VS. Current concepts in restoring acquired cranial defects. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(Suppl 1):14–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Sanus GZ. Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011;2(2):162–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang KP, Lai CH, Chang CH, Lin CL, Lai CS, Lin SD. Free flap options for reconstruction of complicated scalp and calvarial defects: report of a series of cases and literature review. Microsurgery. 2010;30(1):13–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldstein JA, Paliga JT, Bartlett SP. Cranioplasty: indications and advances. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;21(4):400–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Honeybul S. Management of the temporal muscle during cranioplasty: technical note. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(6):701–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Khader BA, Towler MR. Materials and techniques used in cranioplasty fixation: A review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;66:315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krause-Titz UR, Warneke N, Freitag-Wolf S, Barth H, Mehdorn HM. Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty. Neurosurg Rev. 2016;39(1):133–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liang ES, Tipper G, Hunt L, Gan PY. Cranioplasty outcomes and associated complications: A single-centre observational study. Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(1):122–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Singh M, Ricci JA, Dunn IF, Caterson EJ. Alloderm covering over titanium cranioplasty may minimize contour deformities in the frontal bone position. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(5):1292–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Spetzger U, Vougioukas V, Schipper J. Materials and techniques for osseous skull reconstruction. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(2):110–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher J. White
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Perry
    • 2
  • Kevin Tsang
    • 3
  1. 1.Northwest London University HospitalNorthwick Park HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryRegional Unit Northwick Park and St Mary’s HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustSt Mary’s HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations