Basic Methods for Assessing Cellular Proliferation

  • R. Dover


The major problem in attempting to assess proliferation is to ensure that the method used is capable of giving the data we seek. We should first consider what we want to measure. The commonest question is “can we say that cells in this tissue are being produced faster than in that?” Such questions demand a viable technique giving reproducible and unequivocal results that have discriminatory power in statistical tests, and it should be appreciated that such an ideal measurement has not yet emerged. Unfortunately, for both practical and ethical reasons, using clinical material often limits the type of procedure used. Many of the simplest methods will yield only information on the proliferative state of the cells not the rate at which they are being produced. This can produce misleading data since the question we posed asks about rates.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aherne WA, Camplejohn RS and Wright NA (1977) An Introduction to cell population kinetics. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck H-P (1982) Radiotoxicity of incorporated 3H-thymidine consequences for the interpretation of FLM data of irradiated populations. Cell Tiss Kinet 15:469–480Google Scholar
  3. Brandt L, Olsson H and Monti M (1981) Uptake of thymidine in lymphoma cells obtained through fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Relation to prognosis in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Cancer 17:1229–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremer K (1978) Cellular renewal kinetics of malignant non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. In: Mathe G, Seligmann M and Tubiana M (eds) Lymphoid neoplasias II. Clinical and therapeutic aspects. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 5–11Google Scholar
  5. Burholt DR, Schultze B and Maurer W (1976) Mode of growth of the jejunal cryp cells of the rat; an autoradiographic study using double labelling with 3H and 14C thymidine in lower and upper parts of the crypts. Cell Tissue Kinet 9:107–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Camplejohn RS, Gelfant S and Chalker D (1981) An attempt to use vincristine and colcemid to measure proliferative rates in normal human epidermis in vivo. Br J Dermatol 104:243–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clausen OPF, Thorud E and Bolund L (1980) DNA synthesis in mouse epidermis: labelled and unlabelled basal cells in S phase after administration of tritiated thymidine. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 34:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clausen OPF, Elgjo K, Kirkhus B, Pedersen S and Bolund L (1983) DNA synthesis in mouse epidermis: S phase cells that remain unlabelled after pulse labelling with DNA precursors progress slowly through S. J Invest Dermatol 81:545–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper EH, Peckham MJ, Millard RE, Hamlin IME and Gerard-Marchant R (1976) Cell proliferation in human malignant lymphomas. Analysis of labelling index and DNA content in cell populations obtained by biopsy. Eur J Cancer 4:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa A, Bonadonna G, Villa E, Valagussa P and Silvestrini R (1981) Labelling index as a prognostic marker in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 66:1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gentili C, Sanfilipo O and Silvestrini R (1981) Cell proliferation and its relationship to clinical features and relapse in breast cancers. Cancer 48:974–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray JW, Carver JH, George YS and Mendelsohn MC (1977) Rapid cell cycle analysis by measurement of the radioactivity per cell in a narrow window in S phase (RCS). Cell Tissue Kinet 10:97–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Haaskjold E, Refsum SB, Bjerknes R and Paulsen TO (1988) The labelling index is not always reliable. Discrepancies between the labelling index and the mitotic rate in the rat corneal epithelium after intraperitoneal and topical administration of tritiated thymidine and colcemid. Cell Tissue Kinet 21:389–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Howard A and Pelc SR (1953) Synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid in normal and irradiated cells and its relationship to chromosome breakage. Heredity, Suppl 6:261–273Google Scholar
  15. Hume WJ and Potten CS (1982) A long lived thymidine pool in epithelial stem cells. Cell Tissue Kinet 15:49–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Iversen OH, Iversen U, Ziegler JL and Bluming AZ (1974) Cell kinetics in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Eur J Cancer 10:155–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kerr KM and Lamb D (1988) A comparison of patient survival and tumour growth kinetics in human bronchogenic carcinoma. Br J Cancer 58:419–422PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kvaloy S, Godal T, Marton PF, Steen H, Brennhovd IO and Abrahamsen AF (1981) Spontaneous 3H thymidine uptake by histological subgroups of human B cell lymphomas. Scand J Haematol 26:221–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kvaloy S, Kaalhus O, Hoie J, Abrahamsen A and Godal T (1985) 3H thvmidine uptake in B cell lymphomas. Relationship to treatment response and survival. Scand J Haematol 34:429–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lajtha LG (1963) On the concept of the cell cycle. J Cell Comp Physiol 60 (Suppl 1):143–145Google Scholar
  21. Malaise EP, Chavaudra N and Tubiana M (1973) The relationship between growth rate, labeling index and histological type of human solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 9:305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maurer HR (1981) Potential pitfalls of 3H-thymidine techniques to measure cell proliferation. Cell Tissue Kinet 14:111–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer JS and Province M (1988) Proliferative index of breast carcinoma by thymidine labelling: prognostic power independent of stage, estrogen and progesterone receptors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 12:191–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer JS, Friedman E, McCrate MM and Bauer WC (1983) Prediction of early course in breast carcinoma by thymidine labelling. Cancer 51:1879–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer JS, Prey MU, Babcock DS and McDivitt RW (1986) Breast carcinoma cell kinetics, morphology, stage and host characteristics. A thymidine labelling study. Lab Invest 54:41–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Peckham MJ and Cooper EH (1969) Proliferation characteristics of the various classes of Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 24:135–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peckham MJ and Cooper EH (1970) The pattern of cell growth in reticulum cell sarcoma and lymphosarcoma. Eur J Cancer 6:453–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Post J and Hoffman J (1968) Early and late effects of 3H-TdR-labelled DNA on ileal cell replication in vivo. Radiat Res 34:570–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quastler H and Sherman FG (1959) Cell population kinetics in the intestinal epithelium of the mouse. Exp Cell Res 17:420–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ralfs I, Dawber RPR, Ryan TJ, Dufhill M and Wright NA (1981) The kinetics of metaphase arrest in human psoriatic epidermis; an examination of optimal experimental conditions for determining the birth rate. Br J Dermatol 104:231–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schultze B, Maurer W and Hagenbush H (1976) A two emulsion autoradiographic technique and the discrimination of the three different types of labelling after double labelling with 3H and 14C Thymidine. Cell Tissue Kinet 9:245–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Silvestrini R, Piazza R, Riccardi A and Rilke F (1977) Correlation of kinetic findings with morphology of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 58:499–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Steel GG (1968) Cell loss from experimental tumours. Cell Tissue Kinet 1:193–207Google Scholar
  34. Steel GG (1972) The cell cycle in tumours: an examination of data gained by the technique of labelled mitoses. Cell Tissue Kinet 5:87–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Steel GG (1977) The growth kinetics of tumours. Oxford, Clarendon Press Steel GG (1986) Autoradiographic analysis of the cell cycle: Howard and Pelc to the present day. Int J Radiat Biol 49:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tvermyr EMF (1972) Circadian rhythms in hairless mouse epidermal DNA synthesis as measured by double labelling with 3H-Thymidine. Virch Arch B Cell Pathol 11:43–56Google Scholar
  37. Wright NA and Alison MR (1984) The biology of epithelial cell populations. Clarendon Press, Oxford Wright NA and Appleton DR (1980) The metaphase arrest method - a critical review. Cell Tissue Kinet 13:643–658Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Dover

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations