Synthesis of Hand-Arm Gestures

  • T. Lebourque
  • S. Gibet
Conference paper


This paper presents a model that generates natural hand-arm movements. A simple command, specified in terms of successive target end-points is translated through the control model into a complete movement trajectory. This high-level command provides an easy way to describe and manipulate sequences of gestures. Moreover, by its nature, the command tends to a symbolic gesture specification that can be extended to obtain a qualitative description of gestures.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    N. I. Badler and C. B. Phillips. Interactive behaviors for bipedal articulated figures. Computer Graphics, 25: 359–362, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Boulic et al. Goal-oriented design and correction of articulated figure motion with the track system. Computer Graphics, 18: 443–452, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Boulic and D. Thalmann. TRACK: a kinematic goal-oriented animation system for coordinated editing of joint-space based motions. Technical report, Cambridge, England, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Bruderlin et al. Procedural movement for articulated figure animation. Computer Graphics, 18: 453–461, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Bullock and S. Grossberg. Neural dynamics of planned-arm movements: emergent invariants and speed accuracy properties during trajectory formation. In S. Grossberg, editor, Neural Networks and Natural Intelligence. MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T. W. Calvert and A. Bruderlin. Goal-directed, dynamic animation of human walking. Computer Graphics, 23: 233–242, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Cassell et al. Animated conversation: Rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture and spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. In SIGGRAPH ‘94, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (6): 381–391, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Gibet and P.-F. Marteau. A self-organized model for the control, planning and learning of nonlinear multi-dimensional systems using a sensory feedback. Applied Intelligence: The International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Neural Network and Complex-Solving Technologies, 4: 337–349, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Girard. Animal movement in computer animation. In Making them move, pages 209–232. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Lebourque. Synthèse de gestes en langue des signes. Technical report, LIMSICNRS, France, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Moody. La langue des signes. Histoire et Grammaire. Ellipses, Paris, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Prillwitz and R. Leven. HAMNOSYS Version 2.0. Signum Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. Viviani and M. Cenzato. Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11: 828–845, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Lebourque
    • 1
  • S. Gibet
    • 1
  1. 1.LIMSI-CNRSOrsay CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations