The United States and NATO Out-Of-Area Disputes: Does the Cold War Provide Precedents, or Merely Prologue?

  • Douglas T. Stuart


In March of 1949, the Washington policy community was busy preparing a lavish reception to celebrate the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty. Secretary of State Dean Acheson made one notable contribution to the planning. He asked the US Army band to play “It Ain’t Necessarily So” during the festivities. After a year of difficult negotiations, Acheson’s cynicism was understandable. But even if the treaty talks had been easier, Acheson would have had ample reason to question the future of NATO. History provided him with few reasons to be optimistic about the prospects for a large, voluntary alliance system in peacetime. As a student of international relations he recognized that the term unconditional alliance is an oxymoron, and that such arrangements usually collapse due to the inevitable tension between the general interest which brings the signatory nations together and the differing particular interests which are always right beneath the surface.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Elizabeth Sherwood, Allies In Crisis, (New Haven: Yale, 1990) p. 184.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    George Kennan, Memoirs: 1925–1950 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1967), p. 402, quoted in Stuart and Tow, Limits of Alliance, p. 33.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    For background, see Robert Hilderbrand, Dumbarton Oaks (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    Albrecht Randelzhofer: ‘Article 51’, in Bruno Simma (ed.): The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 664.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    Cited in Alfred Grosser, The Western Alliance (New York: Continuum, 1980), pp. 131–2.Google Scholar
  6. 14.
    See Lord Ismay, Nato: The First Five Years, 1949–54 (Paris: North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 1954), p. 194.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    See in particular Georgette Elgey, Histoire de la IV Republique: La Republique des Contradictions, 1951–1954 (Paris: Fayard, 1968), p. 149.Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    See Alistair Home, A Savage War Of Peace: Algeria, 1952–1954 (New York: Penguin, 1977).Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    Quoted by Donald Neff, Warriors at Suez (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981), p. 390.Google Scholar
  10. 19.
    Quoted by Alfred Grosser, Affaires Exterieures: La Politique de la France, 1944–1984 (Paris: Flammarion, 1984), p. 149.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Quoted by Dwight Eisenhower, Waging Peace (Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co., 1965), p. 77.Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    Robert McNamara, In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (New York: Random House, 1995), p. 62.Google Scholar
  13. 29.
    George Bush and Brent Scowcroft, A World Transformed (New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1998) pp. 536–561.Google Scholar
  14. 36.
    Kofi Annan, ‘UN Peacekeeping Operations and Cooperation with NATO’, Nato Review, #5 Vol. 41, (October, 1993) p. 5–7.Google Scholar
  15. 38.
    Javier Solana, ‘NATO’s Role In Bosnia: Charting a New Course for the Alliance’, in Nato Review, #2 vol. 44 (March 1996) p. 3.Google Scholar
  16. 40.
    Ivo Daalder, ‘Bosnia After SFOR: Options for Continued US Engagement’, in Survival, #4 Vol. 39 (Winter 1997–8) p. 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas T. Stuart

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations