Advertisement

Post-Cold War NATO Force Structure Planning and the Vexatious Issue of Multinational Land Forces

  • Thomas-Durell Young
Chapter

Abstract

The NATO Alliance has a long and varied history as regards multinational land formations. From the failed effort to create a European Army during the early 1950s, to the creation of the Allied Command Europe (ACE) Mobile Force-Land in 1960, to the formation of the plethora of multinational corps following the end of the Cold War, two generations of NATO officials have had to confront the nettlesome difficulties of operating these formations. And, indeed, nettlesome their attending problems are. These problems range from balancing the command authority requirements of a multinational force commander and the reticence by nations to relinquish sovereign control of forces to a foreign commander, to effecting multinational logistics, where national laws and financial regulations have traditionally outweighed a foreign commander’s requirements. In consequence, in NATO’s multinational land formations today, to cite one of the best contemporary studies on the subject, “… a gap exists between planning, perceptions and reality.”3

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Roger H. Palin, ‘Multinational Military Forces: Problems and Prospects, Adelphi Paper No. 294 (London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies, (1995), p. 5.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    David S. Yost, NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security (Washington, DC: Institute of Peace Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Robert B. Killebrew, Conventional Defense and Total Deterrence: Assessing NATO’s Strategic Options (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Inc., 1986), pp. 21–53.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    William T. Johnsen and Thomas-Durell Young, Preparing for the NATO Summit: What are the Pivotal Issues? (Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 8 October 1993), pp. 7–18.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    Gregory W. Pedlow, ‘The Politics of NATO Command, 1950–1962’ in, Simon W. Duke and Wolfgang Krieger (eds.), U.S. Military Forces in Europe: The Early Years, 1945–1970 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 15–42.Google Scholar
  6. 16.
    Michael H. Clemmesen, ‘Present and Future Command Structure: A Danish View’, in Thomas-Durell Young (ed.), Command in NATO after the Cold War: Alliance, National, and Multinational Considerations (Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 1997), pp. 189–203.Google Scholar
  7. 31.
    Christian E.O. Millotat, ‘NATO and Germany: A Renaissance in Strategy’, Parameters, Vol. 26, No. 1, (Spring 1996), pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
  8. 41.
    Jon Whitford and Thomas-Durell Young, ‘Multinational Command Authorities: the Need for Change in NATO,’ Defense Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 1, (1997), pp. 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas-Durell Young

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations