Advertisement

Patterns of Response

Originally published in American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony, 1981
  • Samuel P. Huntington
Chapter

Abstract

For Huntington, American society is intrinsically conflictual. His reason for thinking so is not the presence of antagonistic social classes, but the incompatibility between what he calls the “American creed” (a political culture of antistatist values including liberty, equality of opportunity, individualism, democracy, constitutionalism and limited local government) and the requirements of running a society. Coping with the various historical contingencies that confront the United States from abroad (e.g., the Nazi challenge) and within (e.g., disability and aging in an increasingly urban society of nuclear households) routinely produces actions destructive of the values of this antistatist American political culture, particularly a large, more active (e.g., large standing military forces and social security) national government. These practical challenges simply require the coping mechanisms (institutions) of a more hierarchical political culture. This creates what Huntington calls the “IvI gap”—a tension between American ideals (the first “I”) and the institutions (the second “I”) that are necessary to practice modern government. As a consequence of this IvI gap, the United States experiences roughly sixty-year cycles of “creedal passion” involving attacks on authority (hierarchy) in general and central political authority in particular designed to bring political life back into conformance with creedal values. Yet life inevitably returns to hierarchical practices that violate these values. In the pages selected here Huntington provides a brief description of this pattern in terms of a four-stage cycle: moralism, cynicism, complacency, and finally hypocrisy that breeds a return to moralism.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, E. 1963. Conflict and change in American values: A culture-historical approach. Ethics 74 (October).Google Scholar
  2. Blythe, R. 1966. Introduction. Emma by Jane Austen. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  3. Devine, D. 1972. The political culture of the United States. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  4. Emerson, R. W. 1870. Prose works. Boston: Fields, Osgood & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Huber, J., and W. Form. 1973. Income and ideology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jarros, D., H. Hirsch, and F. Fleron, Jr. 1968. The malevolent leader: Political socialization in American subculture. American Political Science Review 62 (June).Google Scholar
  7. Kristol, I. 1972. On the democratic ideal in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Lipset, S. M. 1971. Youth and politics. In Contemporary social problems, 3d ed., edited by R. Merton and R. Nisbet. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  9. McCloskey, H. 1964. Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review 58 (June).Google Scholar
  10. Myrdal, G. 1944. An American dilemma. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Prothro, J. W. and C. Grigg. 1960. Fundamental principles of democracy: Bases of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Politics 22 (February): 284–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Samson, L. 1932. The American mind. New York: Jonathan Cape and Harrison Smith.Google Scholar
  13. Santayana, G. 1956. Character and opinion in the United States. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  14. Shklar, J. 1979. Let us not be hypocritical. Daedalus 108 (Summer).Google Scholar
  15. Stimson, H. and M. Bundy. 1947. On active service in peace and war. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
  16. Stouffer, 1955. Communism, conformity and civil liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  17. Williams, R. 1951. American society. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  18. Zajonc, R. 1968. Thinking: Cognitive organization and processes. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences, ed. David L. Sills. New York: Macmillan Co. and Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel P. Huntington

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations