Advertisement

Culture and Social Movements

Originally published in New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, 1994
  • Doug McAdam
Chapter

Abstract

McAdam presents a good example of focusing on the questions discussed in the introduction to this section, explaining: why groups form, why they adopt the characteristics they do, what factors shape their success and failure, and how cultures broadly influential in their societies shape their identity and opportunities. Key among the points in his analysis is the concept of “frames.” McAdam uses this term to refer to packets of shared assumptions through which particular social movements can be categorized. Frames also highlight common elements through which movements’ purposes can be understood. A core belief of the civil rights movement, for example, was that American society was denying African Americans the equality in which the broader society professed to believe. Subsequent movements, such as women’s and gay rights movements, have largely adopted the same approach as their members pursue their goals. Social movements, in McAdam’s analysis, are embedded in the cultures within which they act and should be understood in relation to both the broader culture and each other across time.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Reading

  1. Aveni, A. 1977. The not-so-lonely crowd: Friendship groups in collective behavior. Sociometry 40: 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellah, R., R. Madsen, W. Sullivan, A. Swidler, and S. M. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  3. Clemens, E. 1993. Organizational repertoires of institutional change: Women’s groups and the transformation of U.S. politics, 1890–1920. American Journal of Sociology 98: 755–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans, S. 1980. Personal politics. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  5. Ferejohn, J. 1991. Rationality and interpretation: Parliamentary elections in early Stuart England. In The economic approach to politics: A critical reassessment of the theory of rational action, edited by K. R. Monroe. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  6. Fireman, B., and W. Gamson. 1979. Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective. In The dynamics of social movements: Resource mobilization, social control, and tactics, edited by M. Zald and J. McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  7. Fishel, L., Jr., and B. Quarles. 1970. In the New Deal’s wake. In The segregation era, 1863–1954, edited by A. Weinstein and F. O. Gattell. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, J. 1973. The origins of the women’s liberation movement. American Journal of Sociology 78: 792–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman, J. 1979. Resource mobilization and strategy: A model for analyzing social movement organization actions. In The dynamics of social movements: resource mobilization, social control, and tactics, edited by M. Zald and J. McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  10. Gerber, I. 1962. The effects of the Supreme Court’s desegregation decision on the group cohesion of New York City’s Negroes. Journal of Social Psychology 58: 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstone, J. 1991. The comparative and historical study of revolution, Annual Review of Sociology 8: 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Sociological theory, edited by R. Collins. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, L. 1984. Politics, culture, and class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hunter, J. D. 1990. Cultural conflict in America. In Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  15. Huntington, S. 1981. American politics: The promise of disharmony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Johnston, H. 1991. Tales of nationalism: Catalonia, 1939–1979. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kitschelt, H. 1986. Political opportunity structures and political protest. British Journal of Political Science 16: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klatch, R. 1995. The counterculture, the New Left, and the New Right. In Cultural politics and social movements, edited by M. Darnovsky, B. Epstein, and R. Flack. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kriesi, H. 1990. The political opportunity structure of the Dutch peace movement. Western European Politics 12: 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larana, E., H. Johnston, and J. Gusfield, eds. 1994. New social movements: From ideology to identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mannheim, K. 1952. The problem of generations. In Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. McAdam, D. 1982. Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. McAdam, D. 1988. Freedom Summer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. McAdam, D. 1990. Culture and social movements. In New social movements: From ideology to identity, edited by E. Larana, H. Johnston, and J. Gusfield. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McCarthy, J., and M. Zald. 1987. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. In Social movements in an organizational society: Collected essays. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, D. 1975. The positive thinkers. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  27. Molotch, H. 1970. Oil in Santa Barbara and power in America. Sociological Inquiry 40: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morris, A. 1984. The origins of the Civil Rights Movement. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Reinarman, C. 1995. The twelve-step movement and advanced capitalist culture: The politics of self-control in postmodernity. In Cultural politics and social movements, edited by M. Darnovksy, B. Epstein, and R. Flacks. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rupp, L., and V. Taylor. 1987. Survival in the doldrums: The American women’s rights movement, 1945 to the 1960s. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sitkoff, H. 1978. A New Deal for blacks. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Skocpol, T. 1979. State and social revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, C. 1991. The emergence of liberation theology: Radical religion and social movement theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Snow, D, and R. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In From structure to action: Comparing social movement research across cultures, edited by B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, and S. Tarrow. Vol. 1 of International social movement research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  35. Snow, D, E. B. Rochford, Jr., S. Worden, and R. Benford. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51: 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swidler, A. 1995. Cultural power and social movements. In Social movements and culture, edited by H. Johnson and B. Klandermans. Vol. 4 of Social movements, protest, and contention, edited by B. Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in movement: Social movements, collective action, and mass politics in the modern state. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tilly, C. 1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  39. Useem, B. 1980. Solidarity model, breakdown model, and the Boston anti-busing movement. American Sociological Review 45: 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walsh, E. 1981. Resource mobilization and citizen protest in communities around Three Mile Island. Social Problems 29: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doug McAdam

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations