Advertisement

Making Social Science Work Across Space and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam’s Making Democracy Work

Originally published in American Political Science Review 90 (2), 1996
  • Sidney Tarrow
Chapter

Abstract

Tarrow initially provides a synopsis of Putnam’s widely heralded Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (1993 and with Leonardi and Nanetti). He is encouraging about Putnam’s early narrower project (see Putnam with Leonardi and Nanetti 1988), which shows how a 1970s central political reform was realized quite differently in the distinctive political cultures of northern and southern Italy. Tarrow agrees that this part of Putnam’s study demonstrates that distinctive political cultures are apt to shape initially similar institutions quite differently over time. So in this regard culture shapes political institutions. However, Putnam extended the initial scope of his analysis to inquire into the origins of these distinctive regional cultures, concluding that these regional peculiarities are long-standing, stemming from differences in civic republicanism (social capital or civil society) in the late medieval period that persist into the present. Thus, once again, Putnam portrays culture as shaping political institutions: Civic republicanism produces more thorough democracy. Tarrow disagrees with the causal flow Putnam suggests in his expanded project. Tarrow argues instead that, across this lengthy period, institutional differences shaped distinctive political cultures. Tarrow also thinks that Putnam’s operationalization of democracy has limitations, and we might add that Putnam’s indices of culture lack a theoretical superstructure.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agulhon, M. 1982. The republic in the village: The people of the Var from the French Revolution to the Second Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bagnasco, A. 1994. Regioni, tradizione civica, modernizzazi-one italiana: Un commento alla ricerca di Putnam. Stato e mercato 40 (April): 93–104.Google Scholar
  3. Bagnasco, A. 1995. Regions, civic tradition and Italian modernization. APSA-CP (Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics) 6 (Summer): 4–5.Google Scholar
  4. Banfield, E. C. 1958. The moral basis of a backward society. Chicago: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bizzocchi, R. 1987. Chiesa e potere nella Toscana del Quattrocento. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  6. Cohn, S. K., Jr. 1994. La storia secondo Robert Putnam. Polis 8 (August): 315–324.Google Scholar
  7. della Porta, D. 1992. Lo scarnbio occulto. Casi di corruzione politica in Italia. Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
  8. Feltrin, Paolo. 1994. Review of La tradizione civica nelle regioni italiane. Rivista italiana di scienza politica 24 (April): 169–172.Google Scholar
  9. Fried, R. 1963. The Italian prefects: A study in administrative politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goldberg, E. 1996. Thinking about how democracy works. Politics and Society 4 (March): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King, G., R. Keohane, and S. Verba, 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inquiry in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Laitin, D. 1994. The civic culture at thirty. American Political Science Review 89 (March): 168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. LaPalombara, J. 1965. Italy: Fragmentation, isolation, alienation. In Political culture and political development, edited by L. W. Pye and S. Verba. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. LaPalombara, J. 1993. Review of Making Democracy Work. Political Science Quarterly 108(3): 549–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leonardi, R., and R. Y. Nanetti, eds. 1990. The regions and European integration: The case of Emila-Romagna. New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
  16. Levi, M. 1996. Social and unsocial capital. Politics and Society 24 (March): 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipset, S. M. 1995. Malaise and resiliency in America. Journal of Democracy 6(3): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lowi, T. J. 1985. The state in politics: The relation between policy and administration. In Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, edited by R. G. Noll. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Molho, A. 1994. Marriage alliances in late medieval Florence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mutti, A. 1995. Paths of development. APSA-CP (Newsletter of the APSA organized Section in Comparative Politics) 6 (Summer): 6–8.Google Scholar
  21. Nanetti, R. Y. 1988. Growth and territorial policies: The Italian model of social capitalism. New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
  22. Pasquino, G. 1994. La politica eclissata dalia ttadizione civica. Polis 8 (August): 307–313.Google Scholar
  23. Pasquino, G. 1995. The politics of civic tradition eclipsed. APSA-CP (Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics) 6 (Summer): 8–9.Google Scholar
  24. Pizzorno, A. 1971. Amoral familism and historical marginality. In European politics: A reader, edited by M. Dogan and R. Rose. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  25. Putnam, R. D., with R. Leonardi and R. Y. Nanetti. 1993a. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Putnam, R. D. 1993b. The prosperous community. American Prospect 13 (Spring): 35–42.Google Scholar
  27. Putnam, R. D. 1994. Lo storico e l’attivista. Polis 8 (August): 325–328.Google Scholar
  28. Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6(1): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. D., R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1981. Devolution as a political process: The case of Italy. Publius 11(1): 95–117.Google Scholar
  30. Putnam, R. D., R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1985. La pianta e le radici: II radicamento dell’istituto regionale nel sisterna politico italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  31. Putnam, R. D, R. Leonardi, R. Y. Nanetti, and F. Pavoncello. 1983. Explaining institutional success: The case of Italian regional government. American Political Science Review 77 (March): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramella, F. 1995. Mezzogiorno e societa civile: Ancora l’epoca del familismo? Il Mulino 44 (May–June): 471–480.Google Scholar
  33. Review symposium, the qualitative-quantitative disputation: Gary King, Robert 0. Keohane, and Sidney Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry. American Political Science Review 89 (July): 45–81Google Scholar
  34. Sabetti, F. 1996. Path dependency and civic culture: Some lessons from Italy about interpreting social experiments. Politics and Society 24 (March): 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salvemini, G. 1955. Scritti sulla questione meridionale, 1896–1955. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  36. Tarrow, S. 1967a. Peasant communism in southern Italy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tarrow, S. 1967b. Political dualism and Italian communism. American Political Science Review 61 (March): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tarrow, S. 1995. Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide in political science. American Political Science Review 89 (June): 471–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trigilia, C. 1986. Grandi partiti e piccole irnprese. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  40. Trigilia, C. 1992. Sviluppo senza autonomia. Effetti perversi delle politiche nel Mezzogiorno. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  41. Trigilia, C. 1994. Dai comuni medievali alle nostre regioni. L’indice, No. 3 (March): 36.Google Scholar
  42. Trigilia, C., ed. 1995. Cultura e sviluppo. L’associazionismo nel mezzogiorno. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
  43. Ventura, A. 1964. Nobilta epopolo nella societa veneta del’ 400 e’ 500. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sidney Tarrow

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations