Advertisement

Intergenerational Transmission Models: A Survey

  • Anne Laferrère
Chapter
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

Exchanges and transfers within families are very specific. They may concern money (as with inter vivos gifts or inheritances), without being selling or buying, help and services, such as child-care or loans; they may or may not have market substitutes (the case is clear for affection and caring). Either the exchange is not perceived as such (I give to my children, without thinking that they might ever give back), or it is very indirect (I marry a public servant ‘in order to’ mitigate our income variability, myself being an entrepreneur); there is usually no written contract, as would be the case with market insurance, for example (my parents invest in my education; I shall give back by helping them when they are old), and one is even far from barter (I receive a present; the rule is that I do not give back immediately but later and differently).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altonji, J., Hayashi, F. and Kotlikoff, L. (1997) ‘Parental Altruism and Inter Vivos Transfers: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1121–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrondel, L. and Masson, A. (1991) ‘Que Nous Enseignent les Enquêtes sur les Transferts Patrimoniaux en France?’, Economic et Prévision, vol. 4/5, pp. 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J. (1974) ‘Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, pp. 1095–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1991) ‘A Treatise on the Family’, enlarged edn, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernheim, B.D. and Stark, O. (1988) ‘Altruism within the Family Reconsidered: Do Nice Guys Finish Last?’, American Economic Review, vol. 78, pp. 1034–45.Google Scholar
  6. Bernheim, B. D., Shleifer, A. and Summers, L. H. (1985) ‘The Strategic Bequest Motive’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1045–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cigno, A. (1991) Economics of the Family. Oxford University Press, ch. 9.Google Scholar
  8. Cigno, A., Giannelli, G. and Rosati, F. C. (1998) ‘Voluntary Transfers among Italian Households: Altruistic and Non-altruistic Explanations’ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 9, pp. 435–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, D. (1987) ‘Motives for Private Income Transfers’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 508–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehrlich, I. and Lui, F. T. (1991) ‘Intergenerational Trade, Longevity, and Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1029–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gale, W. G. and Scholz, K. S. (1994) ‘Bequest and Wealth Accumulation, Are Some Pieces of the Puzzle Missing?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Girard, R. (1990) Shakespeare, Les Feux de l’Envie, Paris: B. Grasset.Google Scholar
  13. Hourriez, J. M., de Barry, C. and Eneau, D. (1996) ‘Les Aides Financières entre Ménages’, INSEE Première, p. 221.Google Scholar
  14. Kimball, M. (1987) ‘Making Sense of Two-Sided Altruism’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 20, pp. 301–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kotlikoff, L. and Spivak, A. (1981) ‘The Family as an Incomplete Annuity Market’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 372–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laferrère, A. (1996) ‘Help to Children’s Households: A Test of Non-altruism on French Data’, INSEE Working Paper, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Mauss, M. (1924) ‘Essai sur le Don. Forme et Raison de l’Echange dans les Sociétés Archaïques’, L’Année Sociologique, vol. 1. Translated as The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. Mauss, M. (1947) Manuel d’Éthnographie, Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  19. Mauss, M. (1950) Sociologie et Anthropologie, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  20. Mauss, M. and Hubert, H. (1899) ‘Essai sur la Nature et la Fonction du Sacrifice’, L’Année Sociologique, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  21. Samuelson, P. A. (1958) ‘An Exact Consumption Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money’, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 467–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stark, O. (1995) Altruism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Willis, R. (1980) ‘The Old Age Security Hypothesis and Population Growth’, in T. Burch (ed.). Demographic Behavior: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Decisionmaking, Boulder Col.: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Laferrère
    • 1
  1. 1.INSEEParisFrance

Personalised recommendations