Advertisement

Conclusion: China and the Balance of Power in the Asia-Pacific Region

  • Solomon M. Karmel
Chapter

Abstract

China’s leaders hope to jettison archaic military conceptions, and new strategic priorities are indeed reforms. Still, this study emphasizes that China’s overhaul of its armed forces has a long way to go. Its new strategy is neither strikingly original nor fully implemented. China’s force structure, meanwhile, is dragged down by a Maoist legacy of obtrusive overstaffing. The problem of army surplus particularly plagues the land forces, but the entire PLA is suffering from the same disease. Organizationally and financially, China’s military faces parallel problems of irrational management, hidden deficiencies, deficits, and waste.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Panitan Wattanayagorn and Desmond Ball, “A Regional Arms Race?” The Journal of Strategic Studies. 18:3 (September, 1995), pp. 149–150.Google Scholar
  2. 27.
    Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI Yearbook, 1997: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 226.Google Scholar
  3. 40.
    Michael Richardson, “East Asians Fear Rivalry for Nuclear Arms Might Drift their Way,” International Herald Tribune June 3, 1998, p. 5.Google Scholar
  4. 41.
    See also Jonathan D. Pollack and Young Koo Cha, A New Alliance for the Next Century: The Future of U.S.-Korean Security Cooperation (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1995), p. xiv.Google Scholar
  5. 44.
    James Heltzman and Robert L. Worden, eds, India: A Country Study, Fifth Edition (Washington, D.C.: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, 1996), pp. 583–594.Google Scholar
  6. 48.
    John Kifner, “Kashmir at the Heart of Crisis,” International Herald Tribune June 3, 1998, p. 5Google Scholar
  7. Molly Moore and Kamran Khan, “In Kashmir, the Shooting Never Stops,” International Herald Tribune June 3, 1998, p. 1.Google Scholar
  8. 51.
    John F. Burns, “India’s New Defense Chief Sees Chinese Military Threat,” New York Times e-news release (www.nytimes.com), May 5, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 55.
    Alan Bullion, “India and UN Peacekeeping Operations,” International Peacekeeping 4:1 (Spring 1997), pp. 98–114.Google Scholar
  10. 57.
    Donald Hugh McMillen, “Chinese Perspectives on International Security,” in Asian Perspectives on International Security (NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1984), p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 58.
    Lieutenant Michael Studeman, “Calculating China’s Advances in the South China Sea: Identifying the Triggers of ‘Expansionism,’” Naval War College Review 51:2 (Spring, 1998), pp. 68–90.Google Scholar
  12. 61.
    Chang Pao-Min, “Vietnam and China: New Opportunities and New Challenges,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 19:2 (September, 1997), p. 137.Google Scholar
  13. 63.
    Ji Guoxing, “Maritime Jurisdiction in the Three China Seas,” Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, the University of California, 1995, p. 24.Google Scholar
  14. 81.
    Donald M. Seekins, “Burma-China Relations: Playing with Fire,” Asian Survey 37:6 (June, 1997), pp. 525–539.Google Scholar
  15. 82.
    Leszek Buszynski, “Southeast Asia in the Post-Cold War Era: Regionalism and Security,” Asian Survey. 32:9 (September, 1992), p. 834.Google Scholar
  16. 90.
    Li Qinggong Wei Wei, “The World Needs a New Security Concept,” The PLA Daily (jiefangjun bao) December 24, 1997, p. 5, in FBIS-CHI-98015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Solomon M. Karmel 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Solomon M. Karmel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations