Advertisement

I Hate Strasberg

Method Bashing in the Academy
  • David Krasner
Chapter

Abstract

What follows is an examination of Method acting based on analysis of its theories, practice, and potential for future development. This work probes the accomplishments of the Method and assesses its relationship to other theories of performance. After writing an essay that summarized what Method acting is,2 I concluded that a book would be required to explain in full what Method acting means. Because much has been said in criticism about the Method, this work seeks to set the record straight. It is an attempt to tie down the variety of meanings of the term “Method acting” and to illuminate its purposes in part by clearing up prevailing misrepresentations. By exploring a balanced view of the Method as well as other theories of performance, we will bring actor training into clearer perspective. The chapters in this book, I believe, will make this possible.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Hare, Amy’s View (London: Faber and Faber, 1997), 113–14.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    David Krasner, “Method Acting: Strasberg, Adler, Meisner,” Twentieth-Century Actor Training, Alison Hodge, ed. (London: Routledge, 2000), 129–50.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haold Clurman, The Collected Works of Harold Clurman, Marjorie Loggia and Glenn Young, eds. (New York: Applause, 1994), 369.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee Strasberg, “Introduction,” The Paradox of Acting & Masks or Faces? (New York: Hill and Wang, 1957), xiii.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See Sharon M. Carnicke’s discussion of the way the American Method changed Stanislavsky s ideas in her book, Stanislavsky in Focus (Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1998), 65Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robert Lewis, Method or Madness? (New York: Samuel French, 1958), 99.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elia Kazan, A Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988), 143.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steve Vineberg, Method Actors: Three Generations of American Acting Style (New York: Schirmer Books, 1991), 6–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    For history of the Group Theatre, see Harold Clurman, The Fervent Years: The Story of the Group Theatre and the Thirties (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1945, 1975)Google Scholar
  10. Cheryl Crawford, One Naked Individual: My Fifty Years in the Theatre (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1959)Google Scholar
  11. Wendy Smith, Real Life Drama: The Group Theatre and America, 1931–1940 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1990).Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    See, for instance, Robert Brustein, “America’s New Cultural Hero: Feelings Without Words,” Commentary 25 (January 1958): 123–29Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Richard Hornby, The End of Acting: A Radical View (New York: Applause, 1992), 5Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charles Marowitz, The Other Way: An Alternative Approach to Acting and Directing (New York: Applause, 1999), 119.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michael Quinn, “Self-Reliance and Ritual Renewal: Anti-theatrical Ideology in American Method Acting,” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 10.1 (Fall 1995): 14.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Denis Salter, “Acting Shakespeare in Postcolonial Space,” Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance, James C. Bulman, ed. (London: Routledge, 1996), 128.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denis Salter, “Body Politics: English-Canadian Acting at National Theatre School,” Canadian Theatre Review 71 (Summer 1992): 13.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elaine Aston, Feminist Theatre Practice: A Handbook (London: Routledge, 1999), 7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    David Mamet, True and False: Heresy and Common Sense for the Actor (New York: Pantheon Books, 1997), 20.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    Foster Hirsch, A Method to Their Madness: A History of the Actors Studio (New York: Norton, 1984), 207Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Charles Marowitz, Stanislavsky & the Method (New York: Citadel, 1964), 43.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Geraldine Page, “Interview” Actors on Acting, Joanmarie Kalter, ed. (New York: Sterling, 1979), 21.Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    Robbie McCauley, Interview, “Obsessing in Public” (1993), A Sourcebook of African-American Performance, Annemarie Bean, ed. (London: Routledge, 1999), 236Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    John Harrop, Acting (London: Routledge, 1992), 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 31.
    Sue-Ellen Case, Feminism and Theatre (New York: Routledge, 1988), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 34.
    Jeanie Forte, “Women’s Performance Art: Feminism and Postmodernism,” Performing Feminisms: Feminist Critical Theory and Practice, Sue-Ellen Case, ed. (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1990), 258.Google Scholar
  27. 35.
    Deborah Warner, interviewed by Helen Manfull, In Other Words: Women Directors Speak (Lyme, NH: Smith & Kraus, 1997), 107–8.Google Scholar
  28. 36.
    Collin Counsell, Signs of Performance: An Introduction to Twentieth-Century Theatre (London: Routledge, 1996), 65.Google Scholar
  29. 40.
    Robert Kane, The Significance of Free Will (New York: Oxford University-Press, 1998), 4.Google Scholar
  30. 41.
    Morton White, The Question of Free Will: A Holistic View (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 8.Google Scholar
  31. 42.
    Lee Strasberg, “Acting and Actor Training,” Producing the Play, John Gassner, ed. (New York: Dryden, 1941), 142.Google Scholar
  32. 49.
    Morris Carnovsky, qtd. in Peter Sander, “The Actor’s Eye,” The Soul of the American Actor 1.2 (Summer 1998): 6.Google Scholar
  33. 50.
    Tadashi Suzuki, “Culture Is the BodyActing (Re)considered: Theories and Practices, Phillip Zarrilli, ed., Kazuko Matsuoka, tr. (London: Routledge, 1995), 155.Google Scholar
  34. 51.
    Paul de Man, “Aesthetic Formalization in Kleist,” The Rhetoric of Romanticism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984), 285Google Scholar
  35. 54.
    Stella Adler, “The Reality of Doing,” TDR 9.1 (Fall 1964): 149Google Scholar
  36. 55.
    Paul Mann, “Theory and Practice,” TDR 9.2 (Winter 1964): 87Google Scholar
  37. 56.
    Stella Adler, “Interview,” Educational Theatre Journal 28.4 (December 1976): 512.Google Scholar
  38. 60.
    Miles Orvell, The Real Thing: Imitation and Authenticity in American Culture, 1880–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989), xvi.Google Scholar
  39. 61.
    Daniel Joseph Singal, “Towards a Definition of American Modernism,” American Quarterly 30.1 (Spring 1987): 14.Google Scholar
  40. 62.
    Thomas Harrison, 1910: The Emancipation of Dissonance (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 147.Google Scholar
  41. 63.
    Or, as Joshua Gamson put it, “celebrity is a primary contemporary means to power, privilege, and mobility.” See, Gamson, Claims to Fame: Celebrity in Contemporary America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), 186.Google Scholar
  42. 64.
    Jill G. Morawski, “Educating the Emotions: Psychology, Textbooks, and the Psychology Industry, 1890–1940,” Inventing the Psychological: Toward a Cultural History of Emotional Life in America, Joel Pfister and Nancy Schnog, eds. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), 219.Google Scholar
  43. 65.
    For an interesting discussion on American individualism as it relates to the loner and the pastoral Western, see Conal Furay, The Grass-Roots Mind in America (New York: New Viewpoints, 1977), 32–36.Google Scholar
  44. 71.
    [Euvgeny] Vakhtangov, “Preparing for the Role,” from Vakhtangov’s diary, in Acting: A Handbook of the Stanislavski Method, Toby Cole, ed., B. E. Zakhara, tr. (New York: Crown Trade, 1955), 145.Google Scholar
  45. 74.
    Stephen J. Whitfield, In Search of American Jewish Culture (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1999), 44.Google Scholar
  46. 75.
    Hutchins Hapgood, The Spirit of the Ghetto (1902) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967), 137.Google Scholar
  47. 78.
    W. E. B. Du Bois, The Souls of Black Folk (1903), Three Negro Classics, John Hope Franklin, ed. (New York: Avon, 1965), 215.Google Scholar
  48. 79.
    Waldo Frank, The Jew in Our Day (New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1944), 149.Google Scholar
  49. 80.
    Martin Buber, I and Thou (1923), Walter Kaufmann, tr. (New York: Touchstone, 1996).Google Scholar
  50. 81.
    Lee Strasberg, “Reunion: A Self-Portrait of the Group Theatre,” Educational Theatre Journal 28.4 (December 1976): 546.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Krasner 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Krasner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations