Advertisement

Discovering and Inventing Hazardous Environments: Sociological Knowledge and Publics at Risk

  • Stephen R. Couch
  • Steve Kroll-Smith
  • Jeffrey D. Kindler
Chapter

Abstract

Robert Merton and Alan Wolfe write about ‘one of the least understood stages in the development of a science … how [scientific] knowledge is consumed.’1 Specifically, they are interested in how sociological knowledge ‘becomes part of the culture and society that academic sociologists themselves study.’2 The authors do an interesting job of tracing how certain sociological terms become part of the language of the larger culture, while other terms do not. They also consider the use of sociological research methods, especially survey research, in the larger society and the impact of sociology on social policy. Merton and Wolfe conclude: ‘Our time seems particularly receptive to sociological ways of knowing’ — for better and for worse.3

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    R. Merton and A. Wolfe, ‘The Cultural and Social Incorporation of Sociological Knowledge,’ American Sociologist, 26 (3) (1995): 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.
    H. Gans, ‘Best-Sellers by Sociologists: An Exploratory Study,’ Contemporary Sociology, 26 (2) (1997): 131–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 5.
    J. S. Kroll-Smith, ‘Sociological Knowledge, Narratives, and the Courts,’ pp. 1–18 in P. Jenkins and J. S. Kroll-Smith, eds, Witnessing for Sociology: Sociologists in Court ( Westport, CT: Praeger, 1996 ).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity ( London: Sage, 1992 ).Google Scholar
  5. See also A. Irwin, Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development ( London: Routledge, 1995 )Google Scholar
  6. S. Couch and J. S. Kroll-Smith, ‘The Environmental Movement, Expert Knowledge, and Social Change,’ International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 34 (2) (1997): 185–210.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    On the ‘extreme environment,’ see also J. S. Kroll-Smith, S. Couch, and B. Marshall, ‘Sociology, Hazardous Environments, and Social Change,’ Current Sociology 45(3) (1997): 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    On the idea of a practical epistemology see C. Geertz, Local Knowledge ( New York: Basic Books, 1983 ).Google Scholar
  9. Refer also to J. S. Kroll-Smith and H. Floyd, Bodies In Protest (New York: New York University Press, 1997), chapter 5.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    A. Gouldner, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology ( New York: Basic Books, 1970 ), p. 497.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    O. Fals-Borda and M. Rahman, Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research ( New York: Apex Press, 1991 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    D. Mileti, T. Drabek, and J. Haas, Human Systems in Extreme Environments (Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1975 ).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    A. Wallace, Tornado in Worcester, National Academy of Sciences/ National Research Council Disaster Study #3 (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1956 ), p. 7.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    A. Giddens, Social Theory and Modern Sociology ( Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987 ), pp. 35.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    J. S. Kroll-Smith, ‘Toxic Contamination and the Loss of Civility,’ Sociological Spectrum, 15 (4) (1995): 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    E. Durkheim, Suicide ( New York: Free Press, 1951 ), p. 241.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    M. Edelstein, Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure ( Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1988 );Google Scholar
  18. K. Erikson, A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disaster, Trauma, and Community ( New York: W. W. Norton, 1994 );Google Scholar
  19. J. S. Kroll-Smith and S. Couch, The Real Disaster Is Above Ground: A Mine Fire and Social Conflict ( Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1990 );Google Scholar
  20. W. Freudenburg, ‘Contamination, Corrosion, and the Social Order: An Overview,’ Current Sociology 45 (3) (1997): 19–39;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. J. S. Picou, D. Gill, and M. Cohen, eds, The Exxon Valdez Disaster: Readings on a Modern Social Problem ( Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt, 1997 ).Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    J. S. Kroll-Smith and S. Couch, ‘Sociological Knowledge and the Public at Risk: A “Self-Study” of Sociology, Technological Hazards, and Moral Dilemmas,’ Sociological Practice Review, 1 (2) (1990): 120–7.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    S. Couch and J. S. Kroll-Smith, ‘The Chronic Technical Disaster: Toward a Social Scientific Perspective,’ Social Science Quarterly, 66 (3) (1985): 564–75.Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    M. Cohen, ‘Technological Disasters and Natural Resource Damage Assessment: An Evaluation of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill,’ Land Economics, 71 (1) (1995): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 29.
    S. Kroll-Smith and V. Gunter, ‘Legislators, Interpreters, and Disasters: The Importance of How as Well as What is a Disaster,’ pp. 160–76 in E. Quarantelli, ed., Sociological Theories of Disaster ( London: Routledge, 1998 ).Google Scholar
  26. 30.
    A. Touraine, Critique of Modernity (Oxford:]Blackwell, 1995), p. 57.Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    U. Beck, Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society ( Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1995 ), p. 52.Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    A. Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity ( Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990 ), pp. 83–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen R. Couch
  • Steve Kroll-Smith
  • Jeffrey D. Kindler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations