Advertisement

The Exxon Valdez Disaster as Localized Environmental Catastrophe: Dissimilarities to Risk Society Theory

  • J. Steven Picou
  • Duane A. Gill
Chapter

Abstract

Contemporary social theorists have begun to devote increasing attention to the sources, nature, and consequences of ecological degradation in the modern world.’ This work has begun to amend the historically conditioned social science view of the natural environment as an ‘objective reality.’ The pre-existing perspective legitimized opportunities for control by human social organization and created a theoretical void concerning the social risks posed by massive environmental catastrophes and global environmental damage.’ As such, recent conceptualizations of the environment—society relationship have provided both theoretical and empirical direction regarding the economic, social, and psychological consequences of contamination to the biosphere. The emergence of environmental harm as a barometer for the distribution of technological risks represents a paradigmatic shift in social theory to a more ‘analytical heuristic’ concern with global environmental degradation and its attendant social consequences. Although the latter issue is inextricably interwoven with postmodern thought, several European sociologists have begun to focus on technological risk and catastrophe, as well as on the emergence of a modern ‘consciousness of threat,’ as one perspective for explaining the demise of classical industrial society.3

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    R. Heilbroner, An Inquiry Into the Human Prospect ( New York: W. W. Norton, 1974 );Google Scholar
  2. A. Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age ( Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991 );Google Scholar
  3. U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity ( London: Sage, 1992 );Google Scholar
  4. U. Beck, Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk ( Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995 ).Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    For example, see T. Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory: Pure and Applied ( Glencoe IL: Free Press, 1949 );Google Scholar
  6. T. Parsons, The Social System ( Glencoe IL: Free Press, 1951 );Google Scholar
  7. L. White, The Science of Culture ( New York: Farrar Strauss, 1949 ).Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    H. Vyner, Invisible Trauma: The Psychosocial Effects of Invisible Environmental Contaminants (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1988). See also Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity; and Beck, Risk Society.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    J. S. Kroll-Smith and S. Couch, ‘Symbols, Ecology and Contamination: Case Studies in the Ecological-Symbolic Approach to Disaster,’ Research in Social Science and Public Policy, 5 (1993): 47–73;Google Scholar
  10. K. Erikson, A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disasters, Trauma, and Community ( New York: W. W. Norton, 1994 ).Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    See also S. Cable and C. Cable, Environmental Problems, Grassroots Solutions: The Politics of Grassroots Environmental Conflict ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995 ).Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    See, among others, O. Duncan, ‘From Social System to Ecosystem,’ Sociological Inquiry, 31 (1961): 140–9;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Catton and R. Dunlap, ‘Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm,’ The American Sociologist, 13 (1) (1978): 41–9;Google Scholar
  14. A. Schnaiberg and K. Gould, Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994 ).Google Scholar
  15. 11.
    J. Hannigan, Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective (London: Routledge, 1995 ). See also U. Beck, ‘World Risk Society asGoogle Scholar
  16. Cosmopolitan Society? Ecological Questions in a Framework of Manu- factured Uncertainties,’ Theory, Culture, and Society 13(4) (1996): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    B. Szerszynski, S. Lash, and B. Wynne, ‘Introduction: Ecology, Realism, and the Social Sciences,’ pp. 1–26 in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, eds, Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology ( London: Sage, 1994 ).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Brown, Laying Waste: The Poisoning of America by Toxic Chemicals ( New York: Washington Square Press, 1981 );Google Scholar
  19. S. Couch and J. S. Kroll-Smith, ‘The Chronic Technical Disaster: Toward a Social Scientific Perspective,’ Social Science Quarterly, 66 (1985): 564–75;Google Scholar
  20. D. Gill and J. S. Picou, ‘Toxic Waste Disposal Sites as Technological Disasters,’ pp. 81–98 in D. L. Peck, ed., Psychological Effects of Hazardous Waste Disposal on Communities ( Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1989 ).Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Erikson, A New Species of Trouble. Refer also to A. Baum and I. Fleming, ‘Implications of Psychological Research on Stress and Technological Accidents,’ American Psychologist, 48 (6) (1993): 665–72;Google Scholar
  22. J. S. Kroll-Smith and S. Couch, ‘Technological Hazards: Social Responses as Traumatic Stressors,’ pp. 79–91 in J. Wilson and B. Raphael, eds, International Handbook of Traumatic Stress ( New York: Plenum Press, 1993 );CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Cohen, Economic Dimensions of Environmental and Technological Risk Events: Toward a Tenable Taxonomy,’ Industrial and Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 9 (4) (1996): 448–81.Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    A. Barton, Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations ( Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1969 )Google Scholar
  25. G. Baker and D. Chapman, eds, Man and Society in Disaster ( New York: Basic Books, 1962 ).Google Scholar
  26. R Shrivastava, Bhopal, Anatomy of a Crisis ( Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1987 );Google Scholar
  27. C. Perrow, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (New York: Basic Books, 1984); Beck, Risk Society and Ecological Politics.Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    T. Drabek, Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings ( New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 26.
    W. Hallman and A. Wandersman, ‘Attribution of Responsibility and Individual and Collective Coping with Environmental Threats,’ Journal of Social Issues 48(4) (1992): 101–18; and Erikson, A New Species of Trouble.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    W. Freudenburg and T. Jones, ‘Attitudes and Stress in the Presence of Technological Risk: A Test of the Supreme Court Hypothesis,’ Social Forces 69(4) (1991): 1143–68. See also Beck, Risk Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 32.
    Beck, Risk Society; D. Goldblatt, Social Theory and the Environment ( Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996 );Google Scholar
  32. M. Cohen, ‘Risk Society and Ecological Modernization: Alternative Visions for Post-Industrial Nations,’ Futures, 29 (2) (1997): 105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 50.
    E. Piper, The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Final Report, State of Alaska Response ( Anchorage: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 1993 ).Google Scholar
  34. 52.
    R. Ott, Sound Truth: Exxon’s Manipulation of Science and the Significance of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill (Anchorage: Greenpeace, 1994); and Hirsch, ‘Justice Delayed.’Google Scholar
  35. 54.
    J. Wiens, ‘Oil, Seabirds, and Science: The Effects of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill,’ Bioscience, 46 (8) (1996): 587–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 57.
    All quotations, except those noted, were collected in the field. See J. S. Picou and D. Gill, The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Open-Ended Responses to Household Survey, 1989–1992 ( Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University, Social Science Research Center, 1997 ).Google Scholar
  37. 62.
    M. Horowitz, Stress Response Syndromes ( New York: Jason Aronson, 1976 )Google Scholar
  38. A. Seidner, A. Amick, D. Kilpatrick, ‘Impact of Event Scale,’ pp. 255–7 in M. Hersen and A. Bellack, eds, Dictionary of Behavioral Assessment Techniques ( New York: Pergamon Press, 1988 ).Google Scholar
  39. 63.
    S. Cohen and G. Williamson, ‘Stress and Infectious Disease in Humans,’ Psychological Bulletin, 109 (1991): 5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. A. Baum, L. Cohen, and M. Hall, ‘Control and Intrusive Memories as Possible Determinants of Chronic Stress’, Psychosomatic Medicine, 55 (1993): 274–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 66.
    M. France, ‘Corporate Litigation: Playing Hardball Is One Thing Business Week 1 July (1996): 32; and Hirsch, ‘Justice Delayed.’Google Scholar
  42. 67.
    J. Alexander, ‘Critical Reflections on Reflexive Modernization,’ Theory, Culture, and Society, 13 (4) (1996): 133–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Steven Picou
  • Duane A. Gill

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations