Reformulating the Problem

  • Michael A. G. Michaud


There are many ways of categorizing explanations for the apparent paradox. One is to focus on actions: what we think the extraterrestrials are doing, and what we are doing. Another is to concentrate on the intentions of each civilization; many explanations rest on assumptions about the behavior of alien societies, which, in turn, rest on analogies with our own. We could classify explanations by technological capabilities, ours and theirs; or we might do as some authors have done, mixing these approaches.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ivan Almar, “Analogies Between Olbers’ Paradox and the Fermi Paradox,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 26 (1992), 253–256; George Musser, “String Instruments,” Scientific American, October 1998, 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shklovskii and Sagan, 418; Asimov, Extraterrestrial Civilizations, 192.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sullivan, 244–245.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heidmann’s argument was described in Stuart Clark, Life on Other Worlds and How to Find It, New York, Springer, 2000, 156. For other rejections of the paradox, see Koerner and LeVay, 181, Robert A. Freitas, Jr., “There is No Fermi Paradox,” Icarus, Vol. 62 (1985), 518-520, and Robert A. Freitas, Jr., “Fermi’s Paradox: A Real Howler,” Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine, 8 September 1984, 30–44.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McDonough, 198.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Webb, 42; Michael D. Papagiannis, “Bioastronomy: The Search for Extraterrestrial Life,” Sky and Telescope, June 1984, 508–511.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. M. Gindilis and G.M. Rudnitskii, “On the Astrosociological Paradox in SETI,” in Shostak, editor, 404, 413.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. G. Michaud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations