Advertisement

Logical IP Subnet Information Protocol for IP Routing over ATM

  • Chan Park
  • Jin Oh Kim
  • Hyup Jong Kim
Chapter
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT)

Abstract

This paper proposes a simple IP routing solution on ATM network using IETF RFC 1577 “Classical IP and ARP over ATM”, named the LIS(Logical IP Subnetwork) Information Protocol(LIP).Originally, RFC 1577 have been specified for an application of classical IP and ARP in ATM network environment configured as an LIS. Therefore, different routing protocols are required to provide an appropriate path between LISs. Currently, the NHRP(Next Hop Resolution Protocol) or the MPOA(Multi-Protocol Over ATM) are considered as candidates. However, those protocols are too heavy or complicate to implement LIP has been devised as an alternative, which is so easy to implement because the basic concept and procedures are identical with RFC 1577. LIP includes Server-base and PVC-base routing solutions in a Large Cloud. We introduce essential function entities and routing procedures for each case. In addition, we also describe how the IP multicast services be supported between several LISs using the LIP protocol.

Keywords

Resolution Routing Subnet Server Multicast signaling 

References

  1. Alles, A. (1995) ATM Internetworking: Cisco Brochures.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, G. (1966) RFC 2022: Support for Multicast over UNI 3.0/3.1 based ATM Networks.Google Scholar
  3. ATM Forum (1996) Private-Network Node Interface Phase 1.Google Scholar
  4. Braden, P. (1989) RFC-1122: STD3:Requirements for Internet Hosts — Communication Layers.Google Scholar
  5. Braden, R. (1994) RFC 1620: Internet Architecture Extensions for Shared Media.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, T. Gumbrich, S. Stuttgen, H. (1996) Comparison of Concepts for IP Multicast over ATM: IEEE ATM’96 Workshop, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. Deering, S. (1989) RFC 1112: Host Extensions for IP Multicasting.Google Scholar
  8. Fenner, W. (1995) Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2: Internet Draft.Google Scholar
  9. ITU-T (1993) Draft Text for Q. 2931.Google Scholar
  10. ITU-T (1996) Broadband ISDN User Part (B-ISUP): Recommendations Q.2761, Q.2762, Q.2763, Q. 2764.Google Scholar
  11. Kats, D. Piscitello, D. (1995) NBMA Next Hop Resolution Protocol(NHRP ): Internet Draft.Google Scholar
  12. Laubach, M. ( 1996 ) RFC 1577: Classical IP and ARP over ATM.Google Scholar
  13. Talpade, R. R. Armitage, G. J. Ammar, M. H. (1996) Experience with Architectures for Supporting IP Multicast over ATM: IEEE ATM’96 Workshop, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  14. Waitzman, D. Partridge, C. Deering, S. (1988) RFC 1075: Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol.Google Scholar
  15. Woodworth, C. Veeraraghavan, M. Shur, D. (1996) Connection Request Protocol(CRP) for IP over ATM,“ IEEE Globecom’96, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chan Park
    • 1
  • Jin Oh Kim
    • 1
  • Hyup Jong Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Broadband Communications DepartmentETRIYusong-Gu, TaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations