Philosophical Accounts of Vagueness, Fuzzy Poverty Measures and Multidimensionality

  • Mozaffar Qizilbash
Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 3)


Borderline Case Poverty Measure Degree Theory Fuzzy Measure Core Dimension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, AB (1987) On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55:749–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, CR, Pattanaik PK (1989) Fuzzy sets, preference and choice: some conceptual issues. Bulletin of Economic Research 41:229–253.Google Scholar
  3. Basu, K (1987) Axioms for a fuzzy measure of inequality. Mathematical Social Science 14:275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broome, J (2004) Weighing Lives. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Cerioli A, Zani S (1990) A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In: Dagum C, Zenga M (eds) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 272–284.Google Scholar
  6. Cheli B, Lemmi A (1995) A “Totally” Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multi-dimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economic Notes 24:115–134.Google Scholar
  7. Chiappero-Martinetti E (1994) A new approach to the evaluation of well-being and poverty by fuzzy set theory. Giornale Degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 53:367–388.Google Scholar
  8. Chiappero-Martinetti E (1996) Standard of living evaluation based on Sen’s approach: some methodological considerations. Notizie di Politeia 12:37–53.Google Scholar
  9. Chiappero-Martinetti E (2000) A multi-dimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning theory. Rivista Intemazionale di Scienze Sociali 108:207–231.Google Scholar
  10. Chiapperio-Martinetti E (2005) Complexity and vagueness in the capability approach: strengths or weaknesses? In: Comim F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S (eds) The capability approach: concepts, applications and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark D, Hulme D (2005) Towards a unified framework for understanding the depth, breadth and duration of poverty. Typescript, University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Fine B (1975) Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese 30:265–300.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster JE and Shorrocks AF (1988) Poverty orderings and welfare dominance. Social Choice and Welfare 5:91–110.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Goguen JA (1969) The logic of inexact concepts. Sythese 19:325–375.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamp JAW (1975) Two theories of adjectives. In: Keenan EL (ed) Formal semantics of natural language Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 123–155.Google Scholar
  16. Keefe R (1998) Vagueness by numbers. Mind 107:565–579CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Keefe R (2000) Theories of vagueness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Keefe R (2003) Unsolved problems with numbers: reply to Smith. Mind 112:291–293.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Keefe R, Smith P (1996) Vagueness: a reader. MIT press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis D (1970) General semantics. Synthese 22:18–67.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Machina K (1976) Truth, belief and vagueness. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33:203–251.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Morduch J (1994) Poverty and vulnerability. American Economic Review 84:221–225.Google Scholar
  23. Qizilbash M (2002) A note on the measurement of poverty and vulnerability in the South African context. Journal of International Development 14:757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qizilbash M (2003) Vague language and precise measurement: the case of poverty. Joumal of Economic Methodology 10:41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qizilbash M (2005a) Transitivity and vagueness. Economics and Philosophy 21:109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qizilbash M (2005b) The mere addition paradox, parity and critical level utilitarianism. Social Choice and Welfare 24:413–431.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Sen AK (1973) On economic inequality. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Sen AK (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Sen AK (1989) Economic methodology: heterogeneity and relevance. Social Research 56:299–330.Google Scholar
  30. Sen AK (1992) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith NJJ (2003) Vagueness by numbers? No worries. Mind 112:283–289.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Streeten P, Burki S J, Haq M, Hicks N, Stewart F (1981) First things first: meeting basic human needs in the developing countries. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Williamson T (1992) Vagueness and ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66:145–162.Google Scholar
  35. Williamson T (1994) Vagueness. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8:338–353.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Zadeh LA (1975) Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Syntheses 30:407–440.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mozaffar Qizilbash
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of East AngliaUK

Personalised recommendations