Advertisement

Multidimensional Fuzzy Relative Poverty Dynamic Measures in Poland

  • Tomasz Panek
Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 3)

Keywords

Membership Function Subjective Approach Objective Approach Household Affluence Chronic Poverty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Betti G (1996) A Longitudinal Approach to Poverty Analysis: the Latent Class of Markov Model. Statistica 56:345–359.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Btaszczak-Przybycińska I, Kotowska IE, Panek T, Podgórski J, Rytelewska G, Szulc A (1998) Living Conditions of Polish Households in 1995–1995. Current State, Threats, Opportunities. Institute of Pubic Affairs, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  3. Btaszczak-Przybycińska I (1992) Multidimensional Statistical analysis of Poverty. In: Poverty Measurement for Economies in Transition in Eastern European Countries. Polish Statistical Association, Warsaw, pp 307–327.Google Scholar
  4. Cerioli A, Zani S (1990) A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty, In: Dagum C, Zenga M (eds) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. Studies in Contemporary Economics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 272–284.Google Scholar
  5. Cheli B, Ghellini G, Lemmi A, Pannuzi N (1994) Measuring Poverty in the Countries in Transition via TFR Method: The case of Poland in 1990–1991. Statistics in Transition 3:585–636.Google Scholar
  6. Deniszczuk L, Sajkiewicz B (1996a) Category of Social Minimum. In: Golinowska S (ed) Polands’ Poverty. Criteria. Valuation. Counteracting (in Polish). Institute of Labor and Social Affairs, Warsaw, pp 146–185.Google Scholar
  7. Deniszczuk L, Sajkiewicz B (1996b) Category of Subsistence Minimum. In: Golinowska S (ed) Polands’ Poverty. Criteria. Valuation. Counteracting (in Polish). Institute of Labor and Social Affairs, Warsaw, pp 18–40.Google Scholar
  8. Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Polish Central Statistical Office (1999) Methodology of the Household Budget Survey (in Polish). WarsawGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene WH (1997) Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Panek T (1994) A Multidimensional Analysis of the Sphere of Poverty in Poland in 1990–1992. RECESS Research Bulletin 2:43–46.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Panek T (1996) A System to Monitor the Living Conditions on Polish Households. Statistics in Transition 2:979–1004.Google Scholar
  13. Panek T, Podg6rski J, Szulc A (1999) Poverty: Methodology and Practice of Measurement (in Polish). Warsaw Scholl of Economics, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodgers JR, Rodgers JL (1993) Chronic Poverty in the United States. The Journal of Human Resources 28:25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shorrocks AF (1978) The Measurement of Mobility. Econometrica 46:1013–1024.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stevens AH (1999) Climbing Out of Poverty, Falling Back In. The Journal of Human Resources 34:557–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Warsaw School of Economics (2000) Polish International Economic Report 2000/2001, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  18. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8:338–353.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Panek
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of the Statistics and DemographyWarsaw School of EconomicsPoland

Personalised recommendations