Advertisement

Linkages of Trade, Investment and Labour in Preferential Trade Agreements: Between Untapped Potential and Structural Insufficiencies

  • Henner GöttEmail author
Chapter
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR, volume 10)

Abstract

Labour provisions are an increasingly regular component of preferential trade agreements (PTAs). The overall goal of these provisions is to enhance the protection and promotion of labour standards in the context of trade and investment liberalization by creating trade-labour and investment-labour linkages within the PTA. This chapter examines the scope and content of contemporary trade-labour and investment-labour linkages in some of the major latest-generation PTAs, analyzing both substantive provisions and institutional mechanisms for their implementation.

The chapter argues that the examined substantive provisions have considerable potential for the protection and promotion of labour standards in the context of trade and investment liberalization. However, whether this potential can be tapped largely depends on how they are implemented. A recurring issue in this respect is that the pertinent implementation mechanisms for labour provisions suffer from structural insufficiencies that persist even in latest-generation PTAs. Against this background, there is a need for a systematic and structural revision of PTA labour provisions, for which the chapter provides some suggestions.

References

  1. Abel P (2018a) Comparative conclusions on arbitral dispute settlement in trade-labour matters under US FTAs. In: Gött H (ed) Labour standards in international economic law. Springer, Cham, pp 153–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel P (2018b) Counterclaims based on International Human Rights Obligations of Investors in International Investment Arbitration. Brill Open Law 1(1)Google Scholar
  3. Addo K (2015) Core labour standards and international trade – lessons from the regional context. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. AK Europa (2017) Non-paper of the Commission services on Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements. AK Europa, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. Alston P (2004) ‘Core Labour Standards’ and the transformation of the international labour rights regime. Eur J Int Law 15:457–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blüthner A (2004) Welthandel und Menschenrechte in der Arbeit: the compatibility of human rights at work with the WTO-System. LangGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolle M (2016) Overview of labor enforcement issues in free trade agreements. Congressional Research Service, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  8. Bronckers M, Gruni G (2018) Improving the enforcement of labour standards in the EU’s Free Trade Agreements. In: Prévost D, Alexovicova I, Pohl J (eds) Restoring trust in trade: Liber Amicorum in honour of Peter Van den Bosche. HartGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks T (2018) U.S.-Guatemala Arbitration Panel clarifies effective enforcement under labor provisions of free trade agreement. Int Labor Rights Case Law 4(1):45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Compa L (2001) NAFTA’s Labour Side Agreement and International Labour Solidarity. In: Waterman P, Wills J (eds) Place, space and the new labour internationalisms. Antipode, pp 147–163Google Scholar
  11. Congressional Research Service (2018) NAFTA and the Preliminary U.S.-Mexico Agreement, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Cottier T (2018) The implications of EC – Seal products for the protection of core labour standards in WTO law. In: Gött H (ed) Labour standards in international economic law. Springer, Cham, pp 69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dombois R (2006) Sozialklauseln im US-Freihandelsabkommen: ein wirksames Mittel internationaler Arbeitsregulierung? Industrielle Beziehungen 13:238–252Google Scholar
  14. Dombois R, Hornberger E, Winter J (2004) Internationale Arbeitsregulierung in der Souveränitätsfalle – Das Lehrstück des North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation zwischen den USA Mexiko und Kanada. LIT, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebert FC (2017) The Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA): are existing arrangements sufficient to prevent adverse effects on labour standards? Int J Comp Labour Law Ind Relat 33(2):295–330Google Scholar
  16. Ebert FC, Posthuma A (2011) Labour provisions in trade arrangements: current trends and perspectives. IILS discussion paper series, ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. Ebert FC, Villarreal P (2018) The renegotiated ‘NAFTA’: what is in it for labour rights? EJIL: Talk! 11 October 2018Google Scholar
  18. European Commission (2017) Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  19. Finbow R (2006) The limits of regionalism: NAFTA’s labour accord. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  20. Foundation for European Progressive Studies (2018) Towards a progressive model for international trade and investment. FEPS, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon K, Pohl J, Bouchard M (2014) Investment treaty law, sustainable development and responsible business conduct: a fact finding survey. OECD working papers on international investment, 2014/01. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. Gött H (2015a) TTIP-Rechtsschutz zu Ende denken. Verfassungsblog, 22 September 2015Google Scholar
  23. Gött H (2015b) Individual labour complaint procedures in future free trade agreements? Völkerrechtsblog, 13 November 2015Google Scholar
  24. Gött H (2018) An individual labour complaint procedure for workers, trade unions, employers and NGOs in future free trade agreements. In: Gött H (ed) Labour standards in international economic law. Springer, Cham, pp 185–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gött H, Holterhus TP (2018) Mainstreaming investment-labour linkage through ‘Mega-Regional’ trade agreements. In: Gött H (ed) Labour standards in international economic law. Springer, Cham, pp 233–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greven T (2012) Anforderungen an Legitimität und Effektivität von Sozialklauseln in Handelsverträgen. In: Scherrer C, Hänlein A (eds) Sozialkapitel in Handelsabkommen – Begründungen und Vorschläge aus juristischer, ökonomischer und politologischer Sicht. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hainbach P (2018) The CJEU’s Opinion 2/15 and the future of EU Investment Policy and Law-Making. Issues Econ Integr 45(2):199–209Google Scholar
  28. Harrison J, Barbu M, Campling L, Ebert F (2018) Labour standards provisions in EU free trade agreements: reflections on the European Commission’s reform agenda. World Trade Rev 2018:1–23Google Scholar
  29. Howse R (1999) The World Trade Organization and the protection of workers’ rights. J Small Emerging Bus Law 3:131–172Google Scholar
  30. ILO (2006) Digest of decisions and principles of the freedom of Association Committee of the Governing Body of the ILO, 5th edn. ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. ILO (2008) Declaration of social justice for a fair globalization. ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. ILO (2016) Assessment of labour provisions in trade and investment agreements. ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. ILO (2017) Handbook on assessment of labour provision in trade and investment arrangements. ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. ILO, IILS (2013) Social dimensions of free trade agreements. ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  35. Kamata I (2015) Labor clauses in regional trade agreements and effects on labor conditions: an empirical analysis. Kyoto University, JapanGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaufmann C (2007) Globalization and labour rights. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. La Hovary C (2018) The ILO’s mandate and capacity: creating, proliferating and supervising labour standards for a globalized economy. In: Gött H (ed) Labour standards in international economic law. Springer, Cham, pp 38–56Google Scholar
  38. Marx A, Soares J (2015) Does integrating labour provisions in free trade agreements make difference? An exploratory analysis of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights in 13 EU trade partners. In: Wouters J, Marx A, Dylan G, Nates B (eds) Global governance through trade – EU policies and approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 158–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maupain F (2013a) The future of the International Labour Organization in the globalized economy. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Maupain F (2013b) The ILO regular supervisory system: a model in crisis? Int Organ Law Rev 10:117–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nolan Garcia K (2009) Transnational advocacy and labor rights conditionality in the international trading order. University of New Mexico, AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar
  42. Orbie J, Putte L, Martens D (2018) Civil society meetings in EU free trade agreements: the purposes unravelled. In: Gött H (ed) Labour standards in international economic law. Springer, Cham, pp 135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Read R (2005) Process and production methods and the regulation of international trade. In: Read R, Perdikis N (eds) The WTO and the regulation of international trade: recent trade disputes between the European Union and the United States. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 239–266Google Scholar
  44. Shihata IFI (1986) Towards a greater depoliticization of investment disputes: the roles of ICSID and MIGA. Foreign Invest Law J/ICSID Rev 1:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stoll P-T (2018) International investment law and the rule of law. Goettingen J Int Law 9(1):267–289Google Scholar
  46. Stoll P, Holterhus TP, Gött H (2017) Investitionsschutz und Verfassung. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  47. Stoll P-T, Gött H, Abel P (2018) A model labour chapter for future EU trade agreements. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, BonnCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Titievska J, Pietsch M (2018) United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA): potential impact on EU companies. European Parliamentary Research Service, European UnionGoogle Scholar
  49. VanDuzer J (2016) Sustainable development provisions in international trade treaties: what lessons for international investment agreements? In: Krajewski M, Hindelang S (eds) Shifting paradigms in international investment law, pp 142–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. VZBV (2017) Implementing and enforcing consumer rights in trade agreements – position paper of the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv). Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V., BerlinGoogle Scholar
  51. VZBV (2019) Europe, keep working for consumers! For strong consumer rights and a fair single market. Guidelines for the 2019 European elections – consumer policy guidelines of the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband – vzbv) for the legislative period from 2019 to 2024. Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V., BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimmer R (2018) Implications of CETA and TTIP on social standards. In: Gött H (ed) Labour standards in international economic law. Springer, Cham, pp 211–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of International and European Law, Jean Monnet Chair for European Union and Global Sustainable Development Through LawGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of International Economic and Environmental LawGeorg-August-University GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations