Advertisement

Reclamation of Saline-Sodic Soils for Sustainable Agriculture in Egypt

  • Mohamed K. Abdel-FattahEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 77)

Abstract

Soil salinity has emerged as the most significant problem of present agriculture of Egypt. Scanty rainfall coupled with high temperature is always conducive to the accumulation of salts. These conditions are predominantly found in Egypt. In Egypt, improving salt-affected soils is essential for ensuring secure agricultural productivity. The study involved leaching experiments on a saline-sodic soil using soil column techniques assessing the efficiency of soil amendments of phosphogypsum (a gypsum-rich material, a by-product of superphosphate manufacture), standard gypsum, sulfuric acid, and rice straw.

The soil amendments used in this experiment were standard gypsum (NG), phosphogypsum (PG), sulfuric acid (SA), and rice straw (RS). Application of the above three amendments was based on the gypsum requirement (GR) equation according to USDA taking in consideration a required final value of exchangeable sodium percent (ESPf) of 12, and an actual exchangeable sodium percent (ESPi) of the initial value of 29.8 was found in the soil.

Air-dried straw was chopped into shredded pieces less than 5 cm long using a suitable hand chopper. The shredded straw pieces at the rate of 130 g/column (60 Mg ha−1) were homogenously incorporated into the soil before the beginning of the leaching process.

The obtained data showed intermittent leaching 0.4 PV (L3) was more effective in decreasing EC, soluble ions, ESP, and exchangeable magnesium and increasing exchangeable calcium as well as improving physical properties (i.e., water-stable aggregates and hydraulic conductivity) than the other ones (i.e., intermittent leaching 0.1 PV or 0.2 PV). On the other hand, the intermittent leaching was more effective in decreasing EC, soluble ions, ESP, and exchangeable magnesium and increasing exchangeable calcium as well as improving physical properties than continuous.

There was a decrease in pH, EC, and ESP values for the degraded soil reclaimed using all amendments. Also, infiltration rate of water increased due to amendments through enhancement of soil aggregation. Also, the thorough mixing application showed superiority over the surface application of gypsum, whether standard gypsum “NG” or phosphogypsum “PG” was used.

All amendments proved to have higher efficiency compared to the control treatment. The efficiency of soil amendments will be presented in this chapter.

Keywords

Chemical amendments Normal gypsum Phosphogypsum Rice straw Saline-sodic soils 

References

  1. 1.
    Flowers T, Flowers S (2005) Why dose salinity pose such a difficult problem for plants breeders? Agric Water Manag 78:15–24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rhoades JD, Loveday J (1990) Salinity in irrigated agriculture. In: Stewart BA, Nielsen DR (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops. USA-CSSA and SSSA. Agronomy No. 31, Madison, pp 1084–1142Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muhammad S (1990) Salt affected and waterlogged soils in Pakistan. An overview. In: Proceedings of Indo-Pak workshop on soil salinity and water management, 10–14 Feb 1990, vol 1, pp 21–37Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharma RD, Ali S, Pant GB (1996) Effect of soil amendments on rice yield. IRRI Notes 21:72–73Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed M, Rahmatullah NBH, Sandhu GR (1986) Reclamation of calcareous saline sodic soil by gypsum and hydrochloric acid under rice cultivation. Trop Agric 63:271–272Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaudhry MR, Ullah T (1982) Role of inorganic and organic amendments in the reclamation of saline sodic soils. MREP Pub. No. 124Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swarp A (2004) Chemistry of sodic soils and management. In: Advances in sodic land reclamation international conference on sustainable management of sodic lands, Lucknow, 9–14 Feb, pp 27–52Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ortize-Dorda J, Martinez-Mora C, Simon B, Cenis JL (2005) Genetic structure of Atriplex halimus population in the Mediterranean basin. Ann Bot 95:827–834Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Houerou HN (1992) The role of saltbushes (Atriplex spp.) in arid land rehabilitation in the Mediterranean Basin: a review. Agrofor Syst 18:107–148Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abbad A, El Hadrami I, Benchaabane A (2004) Atriplex halimus (Chenopodiaceae): a halophytic species for restoration and rehabilitation of saline degraded lands. Pak J Biol Sci 7:1085–1093Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wills BJ, Begg JSC, Brosnan MA (1999) Forage shrubs for the south island dry hill country: l. Atriplex halimus L. (Mediterranean saltbush). Proc N Z Grassland Assoc 52:161–165Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tester M, Davenport R (2003) Na+ tolerant and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot 91:503–527Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rhoades JD (1982) Reclamation and management of salt affected soils after drainage. In: Proceedings of the first annual Western Provincial conference reclamation of water and soil research and management Lethbridge, Alberta, Nov 29–Dec 2 1982, pp 123–197Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhoades JD, Lesch SM, LeMert RD, Alves WJ (1997) Assessing irrigation/drainage/salinity management using spatially referenced salinity measurements. Agric Water Manag 35:147–165Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell JP, Shennan C, Singer MJ, Peters DW, Miller RO, Prichard T, Grattan SR, Rhoahes JD, May DM, Munk DS (2000) Impact of gypsum and winter cover crops on soil physical properties and crop productivity when irrigation with saline water. Agric Water Manag 45:55–71Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keren R, Miyamoto S (1990) Reclamation of saline sodic and Boron-affected soils. In: Tanji KK (ed) Agricultural salinity assessment and management. American Society of Civil Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Emerson WW (1983) Physical properties and structure. In: Russell JS, Greacen EL (eds) Soil factors in crop production in a semi-arid environment. University of Queensland Press, St. LuciaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loveday J (1984) Amendments for reclaiming sodic soil. In: Shainberg I, Shalhevt J (eds) Soil salinity under irrigation processes and management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupta RK, Singh CP, Abrol IP (1985) Dissolution of gypsum alkali soils. Soil Sci 140:382–386Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minhas PS, Khosla BK (1986) Solute displacement in a silt loam soil as affected by method of water application under different evaporation rates. Agric Water Manag 12:63–74Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    FAO (1988) Salt affected soils and their management. Soils bulletin no. 39. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abd El-Fattah MK (2006) Some approaches for reclaiming and restoring degraded soils. Msc thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Zagazig University, ZagazigGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    USDA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture handbook no. 60. U. S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yazdanii H (1986) Investigation of leaching of different nitrogen fertilizers, with cultivation of barley under minimum leaching conditions. Summary report, Esfahan Soil and Water Research Division (C.F. Feizi M. 1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gobran GR, Miyamoto SY (1985) Dissolution rate of gypsum in aqueous salt solution. Soil Sci 140:89–94Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bole JB (1986) Amelioration of a calcareous solonetzic soil by irrigation. Deep ripping and acidification with elemental sulfur. Can J Soil Sci 66:437–456Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harker DB, Mikalson DE (1990) Leaching of a highly saline sodic soil in southern Alberta: a laboratory study. Can J Soil Sci 70:509–514Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carter DL, Robbins CW (1978) Salt outflows from new and old irrigated lands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42(4):627–632Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    FAO (1976) A framework for land evaluation. FAO soils bulletin no. 32, RomeGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Feizi M (1998) Reclamation of saline sodic soils by leaching with different water qualities. In: Proceeding of the international symposium on sustainable management of salt affected soils in the arid ecosystem and FAO-workshop (network group) on integrated management of sustainable use of salt affected soils, Cairo, 21–26 Sept 1997, pp 378–385Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McIntyre DS, Loveday J, Watsons CL (1982) Field studies of water and salt movement in an irrigated swelling clay soil. I. Infiltration during ponding. II. Profile hydrology during ponding. III. Salt movement during ponding. Aust J Soil Res 20:81–90, 91–99, 101–105Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoffman GJ (1980) Guidelines for the reclamation of salt affected soils. In: Proceedings of Inter-American conference on salinity and water management technology, Juarez, 11–12 Dec, vol 198, pp 49–64Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jury WA, Jarrell WM, Devitt D (1979) Reclamation of saline sodic soils by leaching. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:1100–1106Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abdel-Fattah MK, El-Naka EA (2015) Empirical approach of leaching curves for determining the efficiency of reclaiming saline-sodic soils in Sahl El-Tina, Sinai, Egypt. Int J Plant Soil Sci 8(3):1–9. http://www.journalrepository.org/media/journals/IJPSS_24/2015/Aug/Fattah832015IJPSS18606.pdf Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sahin U, Anapali O, Hanay A (2002) The effect of consecutive applications of leaching water applied in equal, increasing or decreasing quantities on soil hydraulic conductivity of a saline-sodic soil in the laboratory. Soil Use Manag 8:152–154Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kamphorst A, Aolt GH (1976) Saline and sodic soils. In: Bolt GH, Bruggenuert MGU (eds) Soil chemistry. Part A: Basic elements. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh NT, Hira GS, Bajwa MS (1981) Use of amendments in reclamation of alkali soils in India. Agrokemia es Talajtan 30(Suppl):158–177Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bresler E, McNeal BL, Carter DL (1982) Reclamation of saline and sodic soils. Saline and sodic soils. Principles dynamics-modeling. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Southard RJ, Shainberg I, Singer M (1988) Influence of electrolyte concentration on the micromorphology of artificial depositional crust. Soil Sci 145:278–288Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Frenkel H, Gerstl Z, Alperovitch N (1989) Exchange-induced dissolution of gypsum and the reclamation of sodic soils. J Soil Sci 40(3):599–612Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meek BD, DeTar WR, Rolph D, Rechel ER, Carter LM (1990) Infiltration rate as affected by an alfalfa and no-till cotton cropping system. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:505–508Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miyamoto S, Enriquez CA (1990) Comparative effects of chemical amendments on salt and sodium leaching. Irrig Sci 11(2):83–92Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khamraev SS, Yusponov ZI, Nizamova F (1992) Salt leaching from solonetzic salt-affected soils during their chemical amelioration by means of phosphogypsum. Pochvovedenie 7:148–153Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mahmoud AA (1996) A comparison between normal gypsum and phosphatic gypsum in the reclamation of sodic soils. MSc thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Zagazig University, ZagazigGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Khedr SSM (1998) Effect of some soil amendments on the ion composition in soil on growth plants. MSc thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Ain Shams University, CairoGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ramirez H, Rodriguez O, Shainberg I (1999) Effect of gypsum on furrow erosion and intake rate. Soil Sci 164(5):351–357Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Al-Oudat M, Arslan A, Kanakri S (1998) Physical and chemical properties, plant growth, and radionuclide accumulation effects from mixing phosphogypsum with some soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:2515–2528Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oster JD (1993) Sodic soil reclamation. In: Lieth HA, Masoom AL (eds) Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants, vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam, pp 485–490Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Habib IM, Sadek SH, Moukhtar MM, Abdel-Mawgoud AS (1994) Chemical amendments efficiency for salt-affected soil reclamation. Menofiya J Agric Res 19(5):2535–2553Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Costa JL, Godz P (1999) Gypsum application to a Natraquoll of the argentine flooding pampas. Ciencia-del-Suelo 17(2):21–27Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Singh H, Bajwa MS (1991) Effect of sodic irrigation and gypsum on the reclamation of sodic soil and growth of rice and wheat plants. Indian Agric Water Manag 20:163–172Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Khalifa MR, Koriem MA, Ibrahim MM, Hammad E (1994) Reclamation of saline sodic soils by leaching with drainage water and gypsum application. Monofiya Agric Res 19:685–698Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Galal ME, Sakr AA, Ali LK (1993) Influence of gypsum application from different sources and time of amelioration on some soil physical properties. J Agric Sci, Mansoura Univ 18(12):3777–3791Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Duran R, Garcia J, Amaya R (2000) Amendment evaluation for the reclamation of sodic soils in the Cesar vally. Suelos Ecuatoriales 30(1):21–28Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    El-Saadany SM (1994) Effect of gypsum and micronutrients application on soil productivity. PhD thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Zagazig University, ZagazigGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    El-Missiry HFE (1996) Chemical amendments and synthetic polymer for reclamation of salt affected soils. MSc thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo University, CairoGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    El-Missiry HFE (2001) Productivity of some salt-affected soils as influenced by chemical amendments and organic materials. PhD thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Moshtohor Zagazig University (Benha Branch), ZagazigGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Genaidy SA, Hegazy MH (1991) Importance of gypsum, organic manure and zinc sulfate application for rice in northern Delta soils. J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ 16:447–457Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mohamed LK (1993) An evaluation of adding different sources of gypsum for improving soil productivity under field conditions. MSc thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Ain Shams University, CairoGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    El-Masry AAY (1995) Effect of some soil amendments on the availability of nutrients of plant. MSc thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Al-Azhar University, CairoGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    El-Tohamy MA (1995) Effect of soil improvement treatments on the status of some nutrients in the soils of El-Sharkia Governorate. MSc thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Zagazig University, ZagazigGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Koriem MA, Khalifa MR, Ibrahim MM, Hammad E (1994) Reuse of drainage water and application of gypsum mixed with lime in reclamation of saline sodic magnesic soils. Monofiya J Agric Res 19:699–714Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Abdel-Mawgoud ASA (1994) Heavy textured salt affected soils characteristics and their amelioration. PhD thesis, Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo University, CairoGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Azhar M, Iqbal M, Khan MA, Ashraf M (2001) Tillage implements in combination with gypsum for the reclamation of saline sodic soils. Pak J Biol Sci 4(9):1111–1113Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Abdurrahman H, Fatih B, Fatih MK, Mustafa YC (2004) Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost Sci Util 12(2):175–179Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Qadir M, Qureshi RH, Ahmad N, Ilyas M (1996) Salt tolerant forage cultivation on a saline-sodic field for biomass production and soil reclamation. Land Degrad Dev 7:11–18Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zaka MA, Obaid-ur-rehman HU, Khan AA (2005) Integrated approach for reclamation of salt affected soils. J Agric Soc Sci 1(2):94–97Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Petrosian GPX (1977) Chemical reclamation of solonetz-solonchaks in the Ararat plain and the possibility of utilizing waters for leaching and irrigation. In: Proceedings of international conference on managing saline water for irrigation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, pp 466–479Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yadav JSP (1993) Salt affected soils and their management with special reference to Uttar Pradesh. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 41(4):623–629Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sadiq M, Hassan G, Chaudhry GA, Hussain N, Mehdi SM, Jamil M (2003) Appropriate land preparation methods and sulphuric acid use for amelioration of salt affected soils. Pak J Agron 2(3):138–145Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yahia TA, Miyamoto S, Stroehlein JL (1975) Effect of surface applied sulphuric acid on water penetration in dry calcareous and sodic soils. Soil Sci Am Proc 39:1201–1204Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Prather RJ, Goertzen JO, Rhoades JD, Frenkel H (1978) Efficient amendment use in sodic soil reclamation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:782–786Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ahmad M, Niazi BH, Sandhu GR (1988) Effectiveness of gypsum hydrogen chloride and organic matter for improvement of saline sodic soils. Pak J Agric Res 9(3):373–378Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Khalaf MA, Sekina IE, Moussa MA (1995) Efficiency of different chemical amendments for reclaiming saline sodic soils in Wadi El-Natron. Egypt J Appl Sci 10(7):847–854Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shinde DB, Bhor P, Pawar NB (2001) Reclamation of saline alkali soil through sulfur oxidizing microorganisms and sulfur. J Maharashtra Agric Univ (India) 26(1):53–56Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    El-Maghraby SE (1997) Impact of natural conditioners and saline irrigation water frequency of calcareous soil productivity. Egypt J Soil Sci 37(2):267–281Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Niazi BH, Ahmed M, Hussain N, Salim M (2001) Comparison of sand, gypsum and sulphuric acid to reclaim a dense saline sodic soil. Int J Agric Biol 3(3):316–318Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Follett RH, Murphy LS, Donahue RL (1981) Fertilizers and soil amendments. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Madejon E, Lopes R, Murillo YM, Cabrera F (2001) Agricultural use of three (sugarbeet) vinasse compost: effect on crops and chemical properties of a cambisol soil in the Guadalquivir River valley (SW Spain). Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:55–65Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hanay A, Yardimci N (1992) A research on the effects of municipal compost and barnyard manure on some physical and chemical properties of soils and soil – water relations. Doga-Trans Agric Forestry 16:91–102Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Cheny K, Swift RS (1984) The influence of organic matter on aggregate stability in some British soils. Soil Sci 35:223–230Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Uson A, Cook HF (1995) Water relations in a soil amended with composted organic waste. In: Cook HF, Lee C (eds) Soil management in sustainable agriculture. Wye College Press, Wye, pp 453–460Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gao G, Chang CC (1996) Charges in CEC and particle size distribution of soils associated with long term annual applications of cattle feedlot manure. Soil Sci 161:115–120Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Prihar SS, Jalota SK, Lteiner J (1996) Residue management for reducing evaporation in relation to soil type and evaporativity. Soil Use Manag 12:150–157Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Singh MV, Singh KK (1989) Reclamation techniques for improvement of sodic soil and crop yield. Indian J Agric Sci 59(8):495–500Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Entry JA, Wood BH, Edwards JH, Wood CW (1997) Influence of organic by-products and nitrogen source on chemical and microbiological status of an agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soil 24:196–204Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Giusquiani PL, Pagliai M, Gigliotti G, Bussinelli D, Benetti A (1995) Urban waste compost: effects on physical, chemical and biochemical properties of soil. Environ Qual 24:175–182Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ibrahim SM, Shindo H (1999) Effect of continuous compost application on water – stable soil macroaggregation in a field subjected to double cropping. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:1003–1007Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Mamo M, Moncrief JF, Rosen CJ, Halbach TR (2000) Municipal solid waste compost application on soil water and water stress in irrigated com. Compost Sci Util 8:236–246Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Naeini SA, Cook HF (2000) Influence of municipal waste compost amendment on soil water and evaporation. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:3147–3161Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Avinelech Y, Kochba M, Yotal Y, Shkedi D (1990) On the use of municipal solid waste compost for the reclamation of saline and alkaline soils. In: Transaction 14th international congress of soil science, Kyoto, vol 6, pp 186–191Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Anand S (1992) Effect of organic amendments on the nutrition and yield of wetland and sodic soil reclamation. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 40(4):816–822Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Anwar Z, Fakhar M, Ghulam S, Hassan NM, Hassan G (2003) Agromelioration of saline sodic soils. Online J Biol Sci 3(3):329–334Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Shaaban MM, El-Fouly MM (2002) Nutrient content and salt removal potential of wild plants grown in salt affected soils. In: Akosy U et al (eds) Proceedings of international symposium on “techniques to control salination for horticultural productivity”, Acta Horticultural, vol 573, pp 377–385Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Epstein E (1985) Salt tolerant crops: origins, development and the prospects of the concept. Plant Soil 89:187–198Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ashour N, Serag MS, Abd El-Haleem AK, Mandour S, Mekki BB, Arafat SM (2002) Use of the killar grass (Leptochloa fusca L.) Kunth. In saline agriculture in arid lands of Egypt. Egypt J Agron 24:63–78Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Barrett-Lennard EG (2002) Restoration of saline land through renegotiation. Agric Water Manag 53:213–226Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Qadir M, Oster JD (2004) Crop and irrigation management strategies for saline sodic soils and waters aimed at environmentally sustainable agriculture. Sci Total Environ 323:1–19Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Glenn EP, Brown JJ, Blueweed E (1999) D salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 18:227–255Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Zhao K, Fan H, Ungar IA (2002) Survey of halophyte species in China. Plant Sci 163:491–498Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Ahmad S, Keatinge JDH, Ali A, Khan BR (1992) Selection of barley lines suitable for spring sowing in the arid highlands of Baluchistan. Sarhad J Agric 8(1):49–56Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Siddiqui KM (1994) Tree planting for sustainable use of soil and water with special reference to the problem of salinity. Pak J Forestry 44(3):97–102Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Elkins CB (1985) Plant roots as tillage tools. Tillage machinery systems as related to cropping systems. In: Proceedings of international conference soil dynamics, Auburn, vol 3, pp 519–523Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Subramaniam B, Babu CR (1994) New nodulating legumes of potential agricultural and forestry value from subtropical Himalayan ecosystems. Biol Agric Hortic 10(4):297–302Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Chaudhry MR, Chaudhry MA, Subhani KM (2000) Biological control of waterlogging and impact on soil and environment. Role of drainage and challenges in twenty-first century. In: Proceeding of 8th ICID international drainage workshop, ICID, New Delhi, 31 Jan–4 Feb 2000, vol 2, pp 209–222Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    De Villiers AJ, Van Rooyen MW, Theron GK, Classens AS (1997) Tolerance of six Namaqualand pioneer species to saline soil conditions. S Afr J Plant Soil 14(1):38–42Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Briggs GG, Bromilow RH, Evans AA (1982) Relationships between lipophilicity and root uptake and translocation of non-ionized chemicals by barley. Pestic Sci 13:495–504Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Newman LA, Strand SE, Choe N, Duffy J, Ekuan G, Ruszaj M, Shurtleff BB, Wilmoth J, Heilman P, Gordon MP (1997) Uptake and transformation of trichloroethylene by hybrid poplar. Environ Sci Technol 31:1062–1067Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Trapp J, McFarlane JC (1995) Plant contamination: modeling and simulation of organic chemical processes. Lewis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Vroblesky DA, Nietch CT, Morris JT (1999) Chlorinated ethane’s from groundwater in tree trunks. Environ Sci Technol 33:510–515Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Glenn EP (1987) Relationship between cation accumulation and water content of salt tolerant grasses and a sedge. Plant Cell Environ 10:205–212Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Glenn EP, Tanner R, Miyamoto M, Fitzsimmons K, Boyer J (1998) Water use productivity and forage quality of the halophyte Atriplex nummularia grown on saline waste water in a desert environment. J Arid Environ 38:45–62Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Leith AF (1994) Use of sea water for growth and productivity of halophytes in the Gulf region. United Arab Emirates University, Faculty of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    David TT (2002) Overview of phytotechnologies. In: Scheper T (ed) Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology. Springer, Naperville, pp 5–47Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Moreno F, Cabrera F, Fernàndez-Boy E, Giròn IF, Fernàndez JE, Bellido B (2001) Irrigation with saline water in the reclaimed marsh soils of South-West Spain: impact on soil properties and cotton and sugar beet crops. Agric Water Manag 48:133–150Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Ghaffer EA, Akmal OM, Eissa MA (2004) Biological drainage possibility in East Suez reclamation project. In: Ragab R (ed) 55th meeting of IEC, ICID – international workshop on management of poor quality water for irrigation, Institutional, Health and Environmental Aspects, Moscow, pp 126–137Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kotb THS, Watanabe T, Ogino Y, Tanji KK (2000) Soil salinization in the Nile Delta and related policy issues in Egypt. Agric Water Manag 43:239–261Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Qadir M, Oster JD (2002) Vegetative bioremediation of calcareous sodic soils: history, mechanism and evaluation. Irrig Sci 21:91–101Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Qadir M, Gaffer A, Murtaza G (2001) Use of saline-sodic waters through phytoremediation of calcareous saline-sodic soils. Agric Water Manag 50:197–210Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Pan D, Bouchard A, Legendre P, Domon G (1998) Influence of edaphic factors on the spatial structure of inland halophytic communities: a case study in Xinjiang, China. J Veg Sci 9:797–804Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Yan X, Sun GR, Li J (2001) Soil nutrient field analysis for plant species in Songnen alkaline grassland. Acta Ecol Sin 21:1973–1985. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Li JD, Yang YF (2004) Combinatorial structures of plant species in saline communities in the Songnen Plains in China. Acta Prataculturae Sin 13:32–38. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Xin X, Gao Q, Li Z, Yang Z (1999) Partitioning the spatial and environmental variations of plant community structure of alkaline grassland on Songnen plain. Acta Bot Sin 41:775–781. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Qu GH, Guo JX (2003) The relationship between different plant communities and soil characteristics in Songnen grassland. Acta Prataculturae Sin 12(1):18–22. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Li XD (1993) Canonical analysis and the principal components analysis of plant community with its environmental factors in the Yellow River Delta. Acta Botanica Sin 35(Supplement):139–143. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Wu ZF, Zhao S, Zhang X (1994) Studies on interrelation between salt vegetation and soil salinity in the Yellow River delta. Acta Phytoecologica Sin 18(2):184–193. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Wang LH, Sun HL, Li W (1994) Relationship between halophytic vegetation and soil salt content and its indicator effect to soil salinity. Shanghai Environ Sci 13(10):33–36. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Hu CS, Wang ZP (1997) A preliminary study on the differentiation mechanisms of soil salinity and plant community of micro-topography in muddy coastal zone. Eco Agric Res 5(4):45–49. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Toth T, Matsumoto S, Mao R, Yin Y (1995) Precision of predicting soil salinity based on vegetation categories of abandoned lands. Soil Sci 160:218–231Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Liu XJ, Li WQ, Yang YM (2003) Studies on the nutrient characteristics of soil and halophyte in coastal saline soil of Hebei Province. Eco Agric Res 11(2):76–77. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Ukpong IE (1994) Soil-vegetation interrelationships of mangrove swamps as revealed by multivariate analyses. Geoderma 64:167–181Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Feoli E, Zurich LG, Cerium W (2002) Evaluation of environmental degradation in northern Ethiopia using GIS to integrate vegetation, geomorphologic, erosion and socio-economic factors. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91:313–325Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Al Khateeb SA, Al Gossibi AM (2001) Performance of three halophytic species grown under saline condition. Zagazig J Agric Res 28(3):569–578Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Arshadullah M, Naseem AR, Rafiq MK, Razzaq A (2006) Correlations of Atriplex amnicola and soil properties. Int J Agric Biol 8(3):394–397Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Russell DF (1994) MSTAT-C v.2.1 (computer based data analysis software). Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State University, East LansingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil Science Department, Faculty of AgricultureZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt

Personalised recommendations