Water Transboundary Policy of Kazakhstan and China
The cooperation between Kazakhstan and China in the field of the joint use and protection of transboundary water resources is very important not only for these countries but for Russia as well. And the key issue here is that the use of such transboundary rivers as Irtysh and Ili, the principal sources of freshwater supply in Kazakhstan, influences tremendously the social and economic development of these countries.
In the recent decades, Kazakhstan has faced the growing water deficit, and one of the reasons for this is the policy of China to increase unilaterally the water intake from transboundary rivers Irtysh and Ili ignoring herewith the interests of the Kazakh side.
Such policy of China threatens the implementation of the plans for economic development of Kazakhstan and affects negatively the solution of the problems to ensure social and political stability. As a result, every year Kazakhstan has to deal with the growing number of problems which the solution is dependent, in fact, on China.
KeywordsCentral Asia China Hydropower Kazakhstan Policy Transboundary rivers
- 1.Dzhamalov RG, Khasiev RS (2012) Modern problems of water triangle: Russia-China-Kazakhstan. Nature 4:3–10 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 2.Sarsembekov TG, Nurushev AN, Kozhakov AE, Ospanov MO (2004) The use and protection of Transboundary rivers in Central Asian countries. Atamura Publishers, Almaty, p 272Google Scholar
- 3.Kazakhstan (2012) Irrigation in Central Asia in figures. Research of AQUASTAT. FAO, Rome, pp 127–155Google Scholar
- 4.Tavrovsky YV (2017) New silk road. In: Major project of the 21st century. Eksmo, Moscow. 368 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 5.Rysbekov YH (2009) The Irtysh River basin (China, Kazakhstan, Russia). Transboundary cooperation on international rivers: problems, experience, lessons, forecasts of experts. NIC MCVC, TashkentGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kurtov AA (2013) Central Asia: waterways as new nodes of contradictions. Central Asia: problems and perspectives. Outlook from Russia and China. RISI, Moscow, pp 155–199 (in Russian)Google Scholar