Advertisement

Sustainable Water Management in Buildings

  • S. Vilčeková
  • E. Krídlová Burdová
  • I. Selecká
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 70)

Abstract

A significant number of building sustainability assessment methods and tools have been developed over the past two decades. Sustainability assessment of buildings means an evaluation of environmental, social and economic aspects and indicators respecting technical and functional characteristics of buildings to design and construction of sustainable buildings. There are many tools for sustainability assessment of buildings used over the world such as LEED, BREEAM, Green Globes, SBTool, CASBEE, etc. This chapter is aimed at introducing the building environmental assessment system (BEAS) which has been developed at the Technical University of Košice. The Slovak system was developed on the base of existing systems and methods used in many countries. The BEAS includes a number of environmental, social and cultural factors. The indicators were proposed according to the analysis of building performance as well as on the base of experimental experiences. The primary fields are building site and project planning, building construction, indoor environment, energy performance, water management and waste management. Water management in buildings is presented here as a critical issue for achieving the sustainable buildings. Indicators of water management are reduction and regulation of water flow in water systems with the weight of 42.3%, surface water run-off with the weight of 12.2%, drinking water supply with the weight of 22.7% and using filtration of grey water (GW) with the weight of 22.7%.

Keywords

Building Sustainability assessment Water management 

References

  1. 1.
    Kibert CJ (2013) Sustainable construction, green building design and delivery.3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castanheira G, Bragança L (2014) The evolution of the sustainability assessment tool SBToolPT: from buildings to the built environment. Sci World J 2014:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/491791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bob C, Dencsak T, Bob L (2010) Sustainability of buildings. In: 4th WSEAS international conference on advances in energy planning, environmental education and renewable energy sources, Kantaoui, Sousse, 3–6 May 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berardi U (2012) Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: rating systems and rated buildings. Sustain Dev 20(6):411–424.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zabalza IB, Aranda-Usón A, Scarpellini S (2009) Life cycle assessment in buildings: state-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build Environ 44(12):2510–2520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Citherlet S, Defaux T (2007) Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span. Build Environ 42(2):591–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahlstrøm O, Sørnes K, Eriksen ST, Hertwich EG (2012) Life cycle assessment of a single-family residence built to either conventional or passive house standard. Energ Buildings 54:470–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banani R, Vahdati M, Elmualim A (2013) Demonstrating the importance of criteria and sub-criteria in building assessment methods. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 173:443–454.  https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP130371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sustainable by the WBDG Sustainable Committee. http://www.wbdg.org/design/sustainable.php. Cited 3 Sept 2017
  10. 10.
    Vierra S (2011) Green building standards and certification systems. [online]. Whole Building Design Guide. http://www.wbdg.org/resources/gbs.php. Cited 3 Sept 2017
  11. 11.
    Berardi U (2012) Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: rating system and rated buildings. Sust Dev 20:411–424.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 15392:2008 sustainability in buildings – general principlesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mateus R, Braganca L (2011) Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: developing the methodology SBToolPT–H. Build Environ 46(10):1962–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ding GKC (2008) Sustainable construction – the role of environmental assessment tools. J Environ Manag 86(3):451–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Užšilaityte L, Martinaitis V (2010) Search for optimal solution of public building renovation in terms of life cycle. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 18(2):102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moldovan MC, Visa I, Neagoe M, Burduhos BG (2014) Solar heating and cooling energy mixes to transport low energy buildings in nearly zero energy buildings. Energy Procedia 48:924–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bonakdar F, Dodoo A, Gustavsson L (2014) Cost-optimum analysis of building fabric renovation in a Swedish multi-story residential building. Energ Buildings 84:662–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burman E, Mumovic D, Kimpian J (2014) Toward measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings. Energy 77:153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dixit MK, Culp CH, Fernández-Solís JL (2013) System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: a conceptual model for definition. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:153–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dodoo A, Gustavsoson L, Sathre R (2011) Building energy-efficiency standard in a life cycle primary energy perspective. Energ Buildings 43:1589–1597.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    European Commission (2008) Energy efficiency: delivering the 20% target. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iddon CR, Firth SK (2013) Embodied and operational energy for new-build housing: a case study of construction method in the UK. Energ Buildings 67:479–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cole RJ (1998) Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Build Res Inf 26(1):3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/096132198370065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dimitris A, Giama E, Papadopoulos A (2009) An assessment tool for the energy, economic and environmental evaluation of thermal insulation solutions. Energ Buildings 41:1165–1171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Korolijaa I, Marjanovic-Halburdb L, Zhanga Y, Hanbya I (2011) Influence of building parameters and HVAC systems coupling on building energy performance. Energ Buildings 43:1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neto AH, Fiorelli FAS (2008) Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption. Energ Buildings 40(12):2169–2176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mwasha A, Williams RG, Iwaro J (2011) Modeling the performance of residential building envelope: the role of sustainable energy performance indicators. Energ Buildings 43(9):2108–2117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kridlova Burdova E, Vilcekova S (2012) Energy performance indicators developing. Energy Procedia 14:1175–1180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seo S, Tucker S, Ambrose M, Mitchel P, Wang CH (2006) Technical evaluation of environmental assessment rating tool. Research and Development Corporation, Project No. PN05 1019(6)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG). [online]. http://www.wbdg.org/. Cited 3 Sept 2017
  31. 31.
    World Green Building Council (WGBC). [online]. http://www.worldgbc.org/. Cited 3 Sept 2017
  32. 32.
    Alyami SH, Rezgui Y (2012) Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustain Cities Soc 5:52–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2012.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Raslanas S, Stasiukynas A, Jurgelaitytė E (2013) Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings. Procedia Eng 57:929–937.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Trusty WB, Horst SW (2002) Integrating LCA tools in green building rating systems. The Austin papers: best of the 2002 international green building conference. Building Green, Inc., BrattleboroGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zacharias I, Dimitriou E, Koussouris T (2003) Developing sustainable water management scenarios by using thorough hydrologic analysis and environmental criteria. J Environ Manag 69:401–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pahl-Wostl C, Tabara D, Bouwen R, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mosters E, Ridder D, Taillieu T (2008) The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecol Econ 64:484–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Al-Jayyousi OR (2003) Greywater reuse: towards sustainable water management. Desalination 156:18l–l92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00340-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kibert CJ (2003) Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery.3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, p 521Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mariolakos I (2007) Water resources management in the framework of sustainable development. Desalination 213:147–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hellstroma D, Jeppssonb U, Karrmanc E (2000) A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management. Environ Impact Assess 20:311–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00043-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Urban zoning plan city of Kosice. http://www.kosice.sk/static/up_2013_V-3.htm
  42. 42.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Vilčeková
    • 1
  • E. Krídlová Burdová
    • 1
  • I. Selecká
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Environmental EngineeringTechnical University of KošiceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations