US Policy in Central Asia: Water-Energy Nexus Priorities

  • Anna Y. GussarovaEmail author
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 85)


The US policy in Central Asia is a security-driven, multilayer strategy that concentrates on Afghanistan and regional development. The United States’ priorities in energy and water issues lie within regional development projects, connecting South and Central Asia. The US government is also trying to enhance regional dialogue on transboundary rivers, establish national energy security policies, and improve management of water resources. The US Agency for International Development plays a crucial role in engaging with the region in both areas in long-term content-wise projects, empowering local communities, educating people, and introducing integrated water resource management.


Central Asia Energy Security The United States Water 


  1. 1.
    Gussarova A (2017) The USA and Central Asia: what will be the policy of D. Trump’s administration? Central Asia Bureau for Analytical Reporting.
  2. 2.
    Hill F (2001) A not-so-grand strategy: U.S. Policy in the Caucasus and Central Asia Since 1991. Brookings.
  3. 3.
    In: Rumer BZ, Sharpe ME (eds) (1996) Central Asia in transition: dilemmas of political and economic development. Armonk, NY, p 83, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Senate, Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on Central Asia and the Caucasus, Testimony of Jones A. E. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, 13 Dec 2001.
  5. 5.
    Energy and Security from the Caspian to Europe. A minority staff report prepared for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate. 112th Congress. pp 21–29. Second Session, 12 Dec 2012. 63 p.
  6. 6.
    New Sources of Friction in a Resource-Constrained World. Global trends 2030: alternative worlds. National Intelligence Council. p 64. Dec 2012. 137 p. ISBN 978-1-929667-21-5
  7. 7.
    Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Availability. Press Briefing Room, Washington, DC. 22 Aug 2017.
  8. 8.
    Starr SF (2005) A partnership for Central Asia. Foreign Aff 84(4):164–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oliker O, Shlapak DA (2005) U.S. Interests in Central Asia: policy priorities and military roles. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
  10. 10.
    Deputy Secretary of State William J. Burns on economic connectivity in Central Asia. Remarks at Asia Society New York. 23 Sept 2014.
  11. 11.
    The Express Tribune (2017) Pakistan to receive more as Afghanistan abandons its share in CASA-1000. 17 June 2016.
  12. 12.
    Bills N (2014) Powering a new silk road: helping connect supply with demand in South and Central Asia. Frontlines. November/December.
  13. 13.
    AZERNEWS (2015) TAPI gains support from U.S. 3 Dec 2015.
  14. 14.
    Regional Development Cooperation Strategy (2015–2019) USAID. pp 1–2. Oct 2014. 44 p.
  15. 15.
    Regional Development Cooperation Strategy (2015–2019) USAID. p 3. Oct 2014. 44 p.
  16. 16.
    Smart Waters (2017) USAID. Kyrgyzstan Fact sheet.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    CIA Office of Transnational Issues (1999) Trans-Caspian gas pipeline facing growing challenges. Intelligence Report. Approved for release in April 2007.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Asia Institute for Strategic StudiesAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations