Advertisement

Sources, Distribution, and Fate of Microscopic Plastics in Marine Environments

  • Richard C. Thompson
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 78)

Abstract

Microplastics are pieces of plastic debris <5 mm in diameter. They enter the environment from a variety of sources including the direct input of small pieces such as exfoliating beads used in cosmetics and as a consequence of the fragmentation of larger items of debris. A range of common polymers, including polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, and polyvinyl chloride, are present in the environment as microplastic particles. Microplastics are widely distributed in marine and freshwater habitats. They have been reported on shorelines from the poles to the equator; they are present at the sea surface and have accumulated in ocean systems far from land. Microplastics are also present in substantial quantities on the seabed. A wide range of organisms including birds, fish, and invertebrates are known to ingest microplastics and for some species it is clear that a substantial proportion of the population have microplastic in their digestive tract. The extent to which this might have harmful effects is not clear; however, the widespread encounter rate indicates that substantial quantities of microplastic may be distributed within living organisms themselves as well as in the habitats in which they live. Our understanding about the long-term fate of microplastics is relatively limited. Some habitats such as the deep sea may be an ultimate sink for the accumulation of plastic debris at sea; indeed, some recent evidence indicates quantities in the deep sea can be greater than at the sea surface. It has also been suggested that microplastics might be susceptible to biodegradation by microorganisms; however, this is yet to be established and the prevailing view is that even if emissions of debris to the environment are substantially reduced, the abundance of microplastics will increase over the next few decades. However, it is also clear that the benefits which plastics bring to society can be realized without the need for emissions of end-of-life plastics to the ocean. To some extent the accumulation of microplastic debris in the environment is a symptom of an outdated business model. There are solutions at hand and many synergistic benefits can be achieved in terms of both waste reduction and sustainable use of resources by moving toward a circular economy.

Keywords

Contamination Harm Microplastic Policy Pollution Solutions 

References

  1. 1.
    Carpenter EJ et al (1972) Polystyrene spherules in coastal waters. Science 178:749–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colton JB, Knapp FD, Burns BR (1974) Plastic particles in surface waters of the Northwestern Atlantic. Science 185:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryan PG, Moloney CL (1990) Plastic and other artifacts on South-African beaches – temporal trends in abundance and composition. S Afr J Sci 86(7–10):450–452Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson RC et al (2004) Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science 304(5672):838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arthur C, Baker J, Bamford H (2009) Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects and fate of microplastic marine debris, 2008 September 9–11, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R30Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Derraik JGB (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 44(9):842–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gall SC, Thompson RC (2015) The impact of debris on marine life. Mar Pollut Bull 92(1-2):170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MSFD GES Technical Subgroup on Marine Litter (2011) Marine litter: technical recommendations for the implementation of MSFD requirements. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    GESAMP (2015) Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: a global assessment. In: Kershaw PJ (ed) IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection, GESAMP No. 90, p 96Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hidalgo-Ruz V et al (2012) Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol 46(6):3060–3075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woodall LC et al (2014) The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris. R Soc Open Sci 1:140317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barnes DKA et al (2009) Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1985–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gouin T et al (2011) A thermodynamic approach for assessing the environmental exposure of chemicals absorbed to microplastic. Environ Sci Technol 45(4):1466–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Napper IE et al (2015) Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics extracted from cosmetics. Mar Pollut Bull 99(1–2):178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Habib B, Locke DC, Cannone LJ (1996) Synthetic fibers as indicators of municipal sewage sludge, sludge products and sewage treatment plant effluents. Water Air Soil Pollut 103:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Browne MA et al (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45(21):9175–9179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Browne MA, Galloway TS, Thompson RC (2010) Spatial patterns of plastic debris along estuarine shorelines. Environ Sci Technol 44(9):3404–3409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collignon A et al (2012) Neustonic microplastic and zooplankton in the North Western Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 64(4):861–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lusher AL, McHugh M, Thompson RC (2013) Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel. Mar Pollut Bull 67(1-2):94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foekema EM et al (2013) Plastic in North Sea Fish. Environ Sci Technol 47(15):8818–8824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Law KL et al (2010) Plastic accumulation in the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre. Science 329(5996):1185–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Browne MA et al (2015) Spatial and temporal patterns of stranded intertidal marine debris: is there a picture of global change? Environ Sci Technol 49(12):7082–7094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Sebille E, England MH, Froyland G (2012) Origin, dynamics and evolution of ocean garbage patches from observed surface drifters. Environ Res Lett 7(4)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maximenko N, Hafner J, Niiler P (2012) Pathways of marine debris derived from trajectories of Lagrangian drifters. Mar Pollut Bull 65(1-3):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lebreton LCM, Greer SD, Borrero JC (2012) Numerical modelling of floating debris in the world's oceans. Mar Pollut Bull 64(3):653–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vianello A et al (2013) Microplastic particles in sediments of Lagoon of Venice, Italy: first observations on occurrence, spatial patterns and identification. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 130:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Obbard RW et al (2014) Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic Sea ice. Earth's Future 2:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eerkes-Medrano D, Thompson RC, Aldridge DC (2015) Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Water Res 75:63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murray F, Cowie PR (2011) Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus (Linnaeus, 1758). Mar Pollut Bull 62(6):1207–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Franeker JA et al (2011) Monitoring plastic ingestion by the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Sea. Environ Pollut 159(10):2609–2615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Turra A et al (2014) Three-dimensional distribution of plastic pellets in sandy beaches: shifting paradigms. Sci Rep 4Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thompson R et al (2005) New directions in plastic debris. Science 310(5751):1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA (2013) Life in the “Plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ Sci Technol 47(13):7137–7146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lobelle D, Cunliffe M (2011) Early microbial biofilm formation on marine plastic debris. Mar Pollut Bull 62(1):197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jambeck JR et al (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347(6223):768–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wright SL et al (2013) Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms. Curr Biol 23:1031–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Browne MA et al (2013) Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Curr Biol 23(23):2388–2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koelmans AA et al (2014) Plastics in the marine environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 33(1):5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thompson RC et al (2009) Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:2153–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    European Commission (2012) Manifesto for a resource-efficient Europe. Brussels, p 2Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    STAP (2011) Marine debris as a global environmental problem: introducing a solutions based framework focused on plastic. In A STAP Information Document. Global Environment Facility, Washington, p 40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Marine Science and EngineeringPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations