Advertisement

pp 1-16 | Cite as

Smart Polymeric Systems: A Biomedical Viewpoint

  • Afsaneh Adibfar
  • Samaneh HosseiniEmail author
  • Mohamadreza Baghaban EslaminejadEmail author
Chapter
  • 15 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series

Abstract

Stimuli-responsive polymers (SRPs) are a recent innovative approach that has numerous biomedical applications. These smart polymers can be used in various industrial and medical areas. Smart polymeric hydrogels are a new class of biomedical materials that have attracted much attention in recent years. These hydrogels change their properties in response to alterations in the chemical, physical, or biochemical properties of their environment, and can be used for many biomedical applications. In this review, we discuss these novel materials with a focus on temperature-responsive polymers as the most applicable type of SRPs. Different types of these polymeric systems and their thermodynamics, as well as challenges for their clinical translation, their combination with other biosystems such as liposomes, and their applications are presented.

Keywords

Smart polymers Stimuli-responsive polymers Temperature-responsive polymers 

Abbreviations

APS

Ammonium persulfate

PDEAAM

Poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide)

PDMAEMA

Poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)

PLGA

Poly(lactide-co-Glycolide) acid

PNIPAM

Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)

PNIPMAM

Poly(N-isopropylmethacrylamide)

PNVIBA

Poly(vinylisobutyroamide)

PVCL

Poly(vinylcaprolactam)

References

  1. Adibfar A, Amoabediny G, Baghaban Eslaminejad M, Mohamadi J, Bagheri F, Zandieh Doulabi B (2018) VEGF delivery by smart polymeric PNIPAM nanoparticles affects both osteogenic and angiogenic capacities of human bone marrow stem cells. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 93:790–799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander A, Ajazuddin KJ, Saraf S, Saraf S (2014) Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) based thermosensitive injectable hydrogels for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 88(3):575–585.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Sabagh AM, Moustafa YM, Hamdy A, Killa HM, Ghanem RTM, Morsi RE (2018) Preparation and characterization of sulfonated polystyrene/magnetite nanocomposites for organic dye adsorption. Egypt J Pet 27(3):403–413.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes AL, Genever PG, Rimmer S, Coles MC (2016) Collagen-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels with tunable properties. Biomacromolecules 17(3):723–734.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn WH, Dickerson EB, Smith MH, McDonald JF, Lyon LA (2009) Peptide-functionalized nanogels for targeted siRNA delivery. Bioconjug Chem 20(5):960–968.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bc800547cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabane E, Zhang X, Langowska K, Palivan CG, Meier W (2012) Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications in nanomedicine. Biointerphases 7(1–4):9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13758-011-0009-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calejo MT, Kjoniksen AL, Pinazo A, Perez L, Cardoso AM, de Lima MC, Jurado AS et al (2012) Thermoresponsive hydrogels with low toxicity from mixtures of ethyl(hydroxyethyl) cellulose and arginine-based surfactants. Int J Pharm 436(1–2):454–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.07.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan A, Orme RP, Fricker RA, Roach P (2013) Remote and local control of stimuli responsive materials for therapeutic applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(4):497–514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen S, Zhong H, Gu B, Wang Y, Li X, Cheng Z, Zhang L et al (2012) Thermosensitive phase behavior and drug release of in situ N-isopropylacrylamide copolymer. Mater Sci Eng C 32(8):2199–2204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.05.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng P, Zeng W, Li L, Huo D, Zeng L, Tan J, Zhou J et al (2016) PLGA-PNIPAM microspheres loaded with the gastrointestinal nutrient NaB ameliorate cardiac dysfunction by activating Sirt3 in acute myocardial infarction. Adv Sci (Weinh) 3(12):1600254.  https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi SH, Yoon JJ, Park TG (2002) Galactosylated poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel submicrometer particles for specific cellular uptake within hepatocytes. J Colloid Interface Sci 251(1):57–63.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2002.8427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu L-Y (2011) Glucose-responsive gating membranes. In: Smart membrane materials and systems. Advanced topics in science and Technology in China. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 197–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18114-6_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chu LY, Li Y, Zhu JH, Wang HD, Liang YJ (2004) Control of pore size and permeability of a glucose-responsive gating membrane for insulin delivery. J Control Release 97(1):43–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.02.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark EA, Lipson JEG (2012) LCST and UCST behavior in polymer solutions and blends. Polymer 53(2):536–545.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.11.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dionigi C, Lungaro L, Goranov V, Riminucci A, Pineiro-Redondo Y, Banobre-Lopez M, Rivas J et al (2014) Smart magnetic poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) to control the release of bio-active molecules. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25(10):2365–2371.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5159-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ertan AB, Yilgor P, Bayyurt B, Calikoglu AC, Kaspar C, Kok FN, Kose GT et al (2013) Effect of double growth factor release on cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 7(2):149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fathi M, Sahandi Zangabad P, Majidi S, Barar J, Erfan-Niya H, Omidi Y (2017) Stimuli-responsive chitosan-based nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Bioimpacts 7(4):269–277.  https://doi.org/10.15171/bi.2017.32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garbern JC, Hoffman AS, Stayton PS (2010) Injectable pH- and temperature-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-propylacrylic acid) copolymers for delivery of angiogenic growth factors. Biomacromolecules 11(7):1833–1839.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100318zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grabstain V, Bianco-Peled H (2003) Mechanisms controlling the temperature-dependent binding of proteins to poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microgels. Biotechnol Prog 19(6):1728–1733.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bp034161tCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gulati N, Rastogi R, Dinda AK, Saxena R, Koul V (2010) Characterization and cell material interactions of PEGylated PNIPAAM nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 79(1):164–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hathaway H, Alves DR, Bean J, Esteban PP, Ouadi K, Sutton JM, Jenkins AT (2015) Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-allylamine) (PNIPAM-co-ALA) nanospheres for the thermally triggered release of Bacteriophage K. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 96:437–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hazot P, Chapel JP, Pichot C, Elaissari A, Delair T (2002) Preparation of poly(N-ethyl methacrylamide) particles via an emulsion/precipitation process: the role of the crosslinker. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 40(11):1808–1817.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.10259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoffman AS (2013) Stimuli-responsive polymers: biomedical applications and challenges for clinical translation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(1):10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu X, Tong Z, Lyon LA (2010) Synthesis and physicochemical properties of cationic microgels based on Poly(N-isopropylmethacrylamide). Colloid Polym Sci 289(3):333–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-010-2347-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang HY, Shaw J, Yip C, Wu XY (2008) Microdomain pH gradient and kinetics inside composite polymeric membranes of pH and glucose sensitivity. Pharm Res 25(5):1150–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9507-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inoue H, Anzai J (2005) Stimuli-sensitive thin films prepared by a layer-by-layer deposition of 2-iminobiotin-labeled poly(ethyleneimine) and avidin. Langmuir 21(18):8354–8359.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la0508341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaiswal MK, Banerjee R, Pradhan P, Bahadur D (2010) Thermal behavior of magnetically modalized poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-chitosan based nanohydrogel. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 81(1):185–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joshi RV, Nelson CE, Poole KM, Skala MC, Duvall CL (2013) Dual pH- and temperature-responsive microparticles for protein delivery to ischemic tissues. Acta Biomater 9(5):6526–6534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karimi M, Ghasemi A, Sahandi Zangabad P, Rahighi R, Moosavi Basri SM, Mirshekari H, Amiri M et al (2016) Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems. Chem Soc Rev 45(5):1457–1501.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00798dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khan F, Tanaka M (2017) Designing smart biomaterials for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 19(1):17.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khan F, Tare RS, Oreffo RO, Bradley M (2009) Versatile biocompatible polymer hydrogels: scaffolds for cell growth. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48(5):978–982.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200804096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim J, Nayak S, Lyon LA (2005) Bioresponsive Hydrogel Microlenses. J Am Chem Soc 127(26):9588–9592.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0519076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim J, Singh N, Lyon LA (2007) Displacement-induced switching rates of bioresponsive hydrogel microlenses. Chem Mater 19(10):2527–2532.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm063086pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kjoniksen AL, Calejo MT, Zhu K, Cardoso AM, de Lima MC, Jurado AS, Nystrom B et al (2014) Sustained release of naltrexone from poly(n-isopropylacrylamide) microgels. J Pharm Sci 103(1):227–234.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klotz BJ, Gawlitta D, Rosenberg A, Malda J, Melchels FPW (2016) Gelatin-Methacryloyl hydrogels: towards biofabrication-based tissue repair. Trends Biotechnol 34(5):394–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korth BD, Keng P, Shim I, Bowles SE, Tang C, Kowalewski T, Nebesny KW et al (2006) Polymer-coated ferromagnetic colloids from well-defined macromolecular surfactants and assembly into nanoparticle chains. J Am Chem Soc 128(20):6562–6563.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0609147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuckling D, Doering A, Krahl F, Arndt KF (2012) Stimuli-responsive polymer systems. In: Polymer science, pp 377–413.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53349-4.00214-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kyle S, Felton SH, McPherson MJ, Aggeli A, Ingham E (2012) Rational molecular design of complementary self-assembling peptide hydrogels. Adv Healthc Mater 1(5):640–645.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leach HEDAJK (2008) Hybrid and composite biomaterials in tissue engineering. In: Topics in multifunctional biomaterials and devices. Oulu university Press, Oulu [Finland], pp 1–26Google Scholar
  40. Lee C-F, Lin C-C, Chiu W-Y (2008) Thermosensitive and control release behavior of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) latex particles. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 46(17):5734–5741.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.22887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li G, Yu N, Gao Y, Tao Q, Liu X (2016) Polymeric hollow spheres assembled from ALG-g-PNIPAM and β-cyclodextrin for controlled drug release. Int J Biol Macromol 82(Supplement C):381–386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lima LH, Morales Y, Cabral T (2016) Poly-N-isopropylacrylamide (pNIPAM): a reversible bioadhesive for sclerotomy closure. Int J Retina Vitreous 2:23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-016-0048-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu F, Urban MW (2010) Recent advances and challenges in designing stimuli-responsive polymers. Prog Polym Sci 35(1–2):3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu D, Yang F, Xiong F, Gu N (2016) The smart drug delivery system and its clinical potential. Theranostics 6(9):1306–1323.  https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.14858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maeda S (1966) Lower critical solution temperature (L.C.S.T.) of the systems, glycerin-polypropylenglycol-ether (GP), or glycerin-polyethylenglycol-ether (GEP) and water. Bull Pharm Res Inst 62:11–13Google Scholar
  46. Makhaeva EE, Tenhu H, Khokhlov AR (2002) Behavior of Poly(N-vinylcaprolactam-co-methacrylic acid) macromolecules in aqueous solution: interplay between coulombic and hydrophobic interaction. Macromolecules 35(5):1870–1876.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0105789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marquardt LM, Heilshorn SC (2016) Design of Injectable Materials to improve stem cell transplantation. Curr Stem Cell Rep 2(3):207–220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-016-0058-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Milasinovic N, Kalagasidis Krusic M, Knezevic-Jugovic Z, Filipovic J (2010) Hydrogels of N-isopropylacrylamide copolymers with controlled release of a model protein. Int J Pharm 383(1–2):53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milichovsky M (2010) Water—a key substance to comprehension of stimuli-responsive hydrated reticular systems. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 1:17–30.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2010.11003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Naddaf AA, Tsibranska I, Bart HJ (2010) Kinetics of BSA release from poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 49(6):581–588.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naha PC, Bhattacharya K, Tenuta T, Dawson KA, Lynch I, Gracia A, Lyng FM et al (2010) Intracellular localisation, geno- and cytotoxic response of polyN-isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAM) nanoparticles to human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and colon cells (SW 480). Toxicol Lett 198(2):134–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Némethy Á, Solti K, Kiss L, Gyarmati B, Deli MA, Csányi E, Szilágyi A (2013) pH- and temperature-responsive poly(aspartic acid)-l-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) conetwork hydrogel. Eur Polym J 49(9):2392–2403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ozdemir N, Tuncel A, Duman M, Engin D, Denkbas EB (2008) Poly(n-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) based nanoparticles for in vitro plasmid DNA delivery. In: Vaseashta A, Mihailescu IN (eds) Functionalized nanoscale materials, devices and systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 325–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8903-9_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Patel NG, Zhang G (2013) Responsive systems for cell sheet detachment. Organogenesis 9(2):93–100.  https://doi.org/10.4161/org.25149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pich A, Tessier A, Boyko V, Lu Y, Adler H-JP (2006) Synthesis and characterization of poly(vinylcaprolactam)-based microgels exhibiting temperature and pH-sensitive properties. Macromolecules 39(22):7701–7707.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma060985qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Qi M, Li G, Yu N, Meng Y, Liu X (2014) Synthesis of thermo-sensitive polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles from CS-g-PNIPAM and SA-g-PNIPAM for controlled drug release. Macromol Res 22(9):1004–1011.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-014-2134-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Qiu Y, Park K (2001) Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 53(3):321–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00203-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Radad K, Al-Shraim M, Moldzio R, Rausch WD (2012) Recent advances in benefits and hazards of engineered nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 34(3):661–672.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2012.07.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rao KM, Rao K, Ha CS (2016) Stimuli responsive Poly(Vinyl Caprolactam) gels for biomedical applications. Gels 2(1):6.  https://doi.org/10.3390/gels2010006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rege NK, Phillips NFB, Weiss MA (2017) Development of glucose-responsive ‘smart’ insulin systems. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 24(4):267–278.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reinelt S, Steinke D, Ritter H (2014) End-group-functionalized poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) via free-radical chain transfer polymerization: influence of sulfur oxidation and cyclodextrin on self-organization and cloud points in water. Beilstein J Org Chem 10:680–691.  https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.10.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rejinold NS, Sreerekha PR, Chennazhi KP, Nair SV, Jayakumar R (2011) Biocompatible, biodegradable and thermo-sensitive chitosan-g-poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) nanocarrier for curcumin drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 49(2):161–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rejinold NS, Baby T, Chennazhi KP, Jayakumar R (2014) Dual drug encapsulated thermo-sensitive fibrinogen-graft-poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) nanogels for breast cancer therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 114:209–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ribeiro CA, Martins MVS, Bressiani AH, Bressiani JC, Leyva ME, de Queiroz AAA (2017) Electrochemical preparation and characterization of PNIPAM-HAp scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 81:156–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roy D, Cambre JN, Sumerlin BS (2010) Future perspectives and recent advances in stimuli-responsive materials. Prog Polym Sci 35(1–2):278–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruiz-Hernandez E, Hess M, Melen GJ, Theek B, Talelli M, Shi Y, Ozbakir B et al (2014) PEG-pHPMAm-based polymeric micelles loaded with doxorubicin-prodrugs in combination antitumor therapy with oncolytic vaccinia viruses. Polym Chem 5:1674–1681.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3PY01097JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scherzinger C, Lindner P, Keerl M, Richtering W (2010) Cononsolvency of Poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEAAM) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) based microgels in water/methanol mixtures: copolymer vs core−shell microgel. Macromolecules 43(16):6829–6833.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma100422eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schmaljohann D (2006) Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1655–1670Google Scholar
  69. Škvarla J, Zedník J, Šlouf M, Pispas S, Štěpánek M (2014) Poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)-block-poly(n-butyl acrylate) thermoresponsive amphiphilic copolymers: synthesis, characterization and self-assembly behavior in aqueous solutions. Eur Polym J 61:124–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sood N, Bhardwaj A, Mehta S, Mehta A (2016) Stimuli-responsive hydrogels in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Drug Deliv 23(3):748–770.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2014.940091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stayton PS, El-Sayed ME, Murthy N, Bulmus V, Lackey C, Cheung C, Hoffman AS (2005) ‘Smart’ delivery systems for biomolecular therapeutics. Orthod Craniofac Res 8(3):219–225.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00336.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stile RA, Shull KR, Healy KE (2003) Axisymmetric adhesion test to examine the interfacial interactions between biologically-modified networks and models of the extracellular matrix. Langmuir 19(5):1853–1860.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la026256vCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sudhakar K, Moloi SJ, Rao KM (2017) Graphene oxide/poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)/sodium alginate-based dual responsive composite beads for controlled release characteristics of chemotherapeutic agent. Iran Polym J 26(7):521–530.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-017-0543-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Takashi M, Tadashi U, Katsuhiko N (2002) Biomolecule-sensitive hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54:79–98Google Scholar
  75. Tang Z, Akiyama Y, Okano T (2012) Temperature-responsive polymer modified surface for cell sheet engineering. Polymers 4(3):1478–1498.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym4031478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tang Q, Yu B, Gao L, Cong H, Song N, Lu C (2018) Stimuli responsive nanoparticles for controlled anti-cancer drug release. Curr Med Chem 25(16):1837–1866.  https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867325666180111095913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Theato P (2008) Synthesis of well-defined polymeric activated esters. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 46(20):6677–6687.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.22994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tombácz E, Turcu R, Socoliuc V, Vékás L (2015) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: recent trends in design and synthesis of magnetoresponsive nanosystems. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 468(3):442–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Traitel T, Cohen Y, Kost J (2000) Characterization of glucose-sensitive insulin release systems in simulated in vivo conditions. Biomaterials 21(16):1679–1687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00050-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Trongsatitkul T, Budhlall BM (2013) Temperature dependence of serum protein adsorption in PEGylated PNIPAm microgels. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 103:244–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.10.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trzebicka B, Robak B, Trzcinska R, Szweda D, Suder P, Silberring J, Dworak A (2013) Thermosensitive PNIPAM-peptide conjugate – synthesis and aggregation. Eur Polym J 49(2):499–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Valderrama-Garcia BX, Rodriguez-Alba E, Morales-Espinoza EG, Moineau Chane-Ching K, Rivera E (2016) Synthesis and characterization of novel polythiophenes containing pyrene chromophores: thermal, optical and electrochemical properties. Molecules 21(2):172.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21020172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wadajkar AS, Koppolu B, Rahimi M, Nguyen KT (2008) Cytotoxic evaluation of N-isopropylacrylamide monomers and temperature-sensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 11(6):1375–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9526-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang T, Liu D, Lian C, Zheng S, Liu X, Wang C, Tong Z (2011) Rapid cell sheet detachment from alginate semi-interpenetrating nanocomposite hydrogels of PNIPAm and hectorite clay. React Funct Polym 71(4):447–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2011.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang L, Liu L, Dong B, Zhao H, Zhang M, Chen W, Hong Y (2017) Multi-stimuli-responsive biohybrid nanoparticles with cross-linked albumin coronae self-assembled by a polymer-protein biodynamer. Acta Biomater 54:259–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wang X, Gu M, Toh TB, Abdullah NLB, Chow EK (2018) Stimuli-responsive Nanodiamond-based biosensor for enhanced metastatic tumor site detection. SLAS Technol 23(1):44–56.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2472630317735497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wei M, Gao Y, Li X, Serpe MJ (2017) Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications. Polym Chem 8(1):127–143.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6py01585aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Xiong Z, Peng B, Han X, Peng C, Liu H, Hu Y (2011) Dual-stimuli responsive behaviors of diblock polyampholyte PDMAEMA-b-PAA in aqueous solution. J Colloid Interface Sci 356(2):557–565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Xu Y, Fu M, Li Z, Fan Z, Li X, Liu Y, Anderson PM et al (2016) A prosurvival and proangiogenic stem cell delivery system to promote ischemic limb regeneration. Acta Biomater 31:99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Yamamoto K, Serizawa T, Akashi M (2003) Synthesis and thermosensitive properties of Poly[(N-vinylamide)-co-(vinyl acetate)]s and their hydrogels. Macromol Chem Phys 204(7):1027–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200390073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yamato M, Konno C, Utsumi M, Kikuchi A, Okano T (2002) Thermally responsive polymer-grafted surfaces facilitate patterned cell seeding and co-culture. Biomaterials 23(2):561–567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00138-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ye M, Zhang D, Han L, Tejada J, Ortiz C (2006) Synthesis, preparation, and conformation of stimulus-responsive end-grafted poly(methacrylic acid-g-ethylene glycol) layers. Soft Matter 2(3):243.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b510894bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zhang X-Z, Sun G-M, Chu CC (2004) Temperature sensitive dendrite-shaped PNIPAAm/Dex-AI hybrid hydrogel particles: formulation and properties. Eur Polym J 40(9):2251–2257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.04.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zhang Y, Guan Y, Zhou S (2006) Synthesis and volume phase transitions of glucose-sensitive microgels. Biomacromolecules 7(11):3196–3201.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060557sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhang J, Cui Z, Field R, Moloney MG, Rimmer S, Ye H (2015) Thermo-responsive microcarriers based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Eur Polym J 67:346–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zhang J, Jiang X, Wen X, Xu Q, Zeng H, Zhao Y, Liu M et al (2019) Bio-responsive smart polymers and biomedical applications. J Phy Mater 2(3):032004.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ab1af5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhao W, Zhang H, He Q, Li Y, Gu J, Li L, Li H et al (2011a) A glucose-responsive controlled release of insulin system based on enzyme multilayers-coated mesoporous silica particles. Chem Commun (Camb) 47(33):9459–9461.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc12740cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zhao X, Kim J, Cezar CA, Huebsch N, Lee K, Bouhadir K, Mooney DJ (2011b) Active scaffolds for on-demand drug and cell delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(1):67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007862108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhu Q, Chen L, Zhu P, Luan J, Mao C, Huang X, Shen J (2013) Preparation of PNIPAM-g-P (NIPAM-co-St) microspheres and their blood compatibility. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 104:61–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research CenterRoyan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, 1665659911, ACECRTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Cell Engineering, Cell Science Research CenterRoyan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, 1665659911, ACECRTehranIran

Personalised recommendations