Advertisement

Designing multimedia interfaces

  • Alistair Sutcliffe
  • Peter Faraday
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 753)

Abstract

Multimedia interfaces are currently created by intuition. Development of a method for analysis and design of multimedia presentation interfaces is described. The study investigates task based information analysis, persistence of information, selection attention and concurrency in presentation. The method gives an agenda of issues, diagrams and techniques for specification, and guidelines for media selection and presentation scripting. Use of the method is illustrated with a case study of shipboard emergency management.

Keywords

Task Model Information Type Task Step Viewer Attention Selection Guideline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Alty & C.D.C. McCartney: Design of a Multi-media Presentation System for a Process Control Enviroment. Eurographics Multimedia workshop: Stockholm (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Andre & T. Rist: Generating Illustrated Documents: A plan based approach. InfoJapan 90, Vol 2, 163–170 (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.J. Bartram: Comprehending spatial information: The relative efficiency of different methods of presenting information about bus routes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 103–110 (1980)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Becklem & D. Cervone: Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory & Cognition, 11(6), 601–608 (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.R. Bieger & M.D. Glock: The Information Content of Picture-Text Instructions. Journal of Experimental Education, 53, 68–76 (1984)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.R. Booher: Relative Comprehensibility of Pictorial Information and Printed word in Proceduralized Instructions. Human Factors, 17(3), 266–277 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Fiener & K.R. McKeown: Generating Co-ordinated Multimedia Explanations. In 6th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications (Santa Barbara CA) (Pg 290–296) (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Grimes: Mild Auditory-Visual dissonance in TV News may exceed viewer attention. Human Communication Research 18(2) 268–298 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.J. Hitch: Working memory. In B. Christie & M. Gardiner (eds.): Applying cognitive psychology to user interface design. London: J. Wiley (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Johnson, H. Johnson, R. Waddington, & A. Shouls: Task-Related Knowledge Structures: Analysis. Modelling and Application. In D.M. Jones, R. Winder (eds.): People and Computers IV. Cambridge University Press. (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.B. Long & J. Dowell: Conceptions of the Discipline of HCI: Craft, Applied Science and Engineering. In A.G. Sutcliffe, L. Macaulay (eds.): People and Computers V., Cambridge University Press. (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.C. Mann & S.A Thompson: Rhetorical Structure Theory — Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8(3), 243–281 (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Maybury: Planning Multimedia Explanations Using Communicative Acts. In Proceedings of 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Pg 61–66) (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Miller: Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(5), 331–343 (1986)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Navon & J. Miller: Role of Outcome Conflict in Dual Task Interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 435–448(1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Petre & T.R.G. Green: Is graphical notation really superior to text, or just different ? Some claims by logic designers about graphics in notation. In Fifth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (Urbino, Italy) (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Posner: Visual Dominance: An Information Processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L.P. Rieber: Animation in Computer Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38, 77–86 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.R Searle: Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press (1969)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C.D. Wickens: Processing Resources in Attention. In R. Pararsuraman & D. Davies (eds.): Varieties of Attention (Pg 63–102). New York: Academic Press (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alistair Sutcliffe
    • 1
  • Peter Faraday
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for HCI Design, School of InformaticsCity UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations