Advertisement

Structuring the field of HCI: An empirical study of experts' representations

  • Peter Brusilovsky
  • Ivan Burmistrov
  • Victor Kaptelinin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 753)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of empirical study of mental representations of the field of HCI, obtained by statistical analysis. Eight HCI experts participating in the study were asked to classify the papers presented at the EWHCI'92 Conference. The results show satisfactory agreement between the experts' classifications, as well as high interpretability of the group data. Some conclusions about the implicit “cognitive map” of the HCI field are discussed in the paper.

Keywords

Activity Theory Human Computer Interaction Cluster Tree Conference Programme Conference Session 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bannon L. Interdisciplinarity or Interdisciplinary Theory in CSCW? Position paper for the Workshop on Interdisciplinary Theory for CSCW Design. CSCW'92, 1992Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burmistrov I. V., Shmeliov A. G. ExSort and DCS: Prototype program shells using a psychosemantic approach to concept acquisition, representation and assessment. In: P. Brusilovsky and V. Stefanjuk (Eds.) Proceedings of the East-West Conference on Emerging Computer Technologies in Education. (April 6–9, 1992. Moscow, Russia). Moscow: ICSTI, 1992, pp. 46–51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroll J. (Ed.) Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human Computer Interface. Cambridge ea.: CUP. 1991, 333 p.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donskoy M. Position paper for Workshop on Cross-cultural Perspectives in HCI. INTERCHIP, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Draper S. W. Activity Theory: The new direction for HCI? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 33 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gornostaev Ju. (Ed.) Proceedings of the East-West International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction EWHCF93. (St.-Petersburg, Russia, August 4–8, 1992). Moscow: ICSTI 1992, 479 p.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32, 241–254 (1967)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuutti K., Bannon L. J. Searching for unity among diversity: Exploring the “interface” concept. In: Ashlund S. et al. (Eds.). INTERCHI'93 Conference Proceedings (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 24–29, 1993). New York: ACM 1993, pp. 263–268.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller G. A. A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 6, 161–191 (1969)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rogers Y. More insight or misinterpretation? Interdisciplinary CSCW Research in Context. Position paper for Workshop on Interdisciplinary Theory for CSCW Design. CSCW'92, 1992Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Brusilovsky
    • 1
  • Ivan Burmistrov
    • 2
  • Victor Kaptelinin
    • 3
  1. 1.International Centre for Scientific and Technical InformationMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Faculty of PsychologyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Psychological InstituteRussian Academy of EducationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations