The Grace Tutor: A qualified success

  • Jean McKendree
  • Bob Radlinski
  • Michael E. Atwood
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 608)


The Grace Intelligent Tutoring System is being developed within NYNEX Science & Technology, Inc. to assist in teaching COBOL to both novice and experienced programmers. We describe the result of three trials with Grace and the lessons that we learned by having a wide variety of student populations in real classes. We discuss the changes to the Grace Tutor which create greater congruence between the tutor and the actual programming environments used by the students. Finally we discuss the one aspect in which we do not consider the Grace Tutor a success: our inability to move Grace from the lab into everyday, classroom use. We discuss why we think this critical point has not yet been reached, not only by the Grace Tutor but by numerous other educational technology projects which have been only laboratory successes.


Accumulation Model Intelligent Tutoring System Cognitive Apprenticeship Legitimate Peripheral Participation Telephone Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A.T., and Lewis, M.W., Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring, Artificial Intelligence, 42, 7–49, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J.R. and Reiser, B.J., The LISP Tutor. Byte, 10, (4), 159–175, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, J.S. Research that reinvents the corporation. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S. E. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gray, W.D. and Atwood, M.E. Transfer, adaptation, and the use of intelligent tutoring technology: The case of Grace. In M. Farr and J. Psotka (eds.) Intelligent computer tutors: Real world applications, New York: Taylor & Francis, in press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greeno, J. Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr and K. Kotovsky (Eds.) Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, W. B. Intelligent tutoring systems: If they are such good ideas, why aren't there more of them? Paper presented at the 10th Interservice/Industry Training Systems Conference (I/ITSC), November, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lave, J. and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Science Research Associates, Computer Programmer Aptitude Battery, Short Form A, Revised Version. Chicago, IL, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schofield, J. W. and Evans-Rhodes, D. Artificial intelligence in the classroom: The impact of a computer-based tutor on teachers and students. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI and Education. Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean McKendree
    • 1
  • Bob Radlinski
    • 1
  • Michael E. Atwood
    • 1
  1. 1.NYNEX Science & Technology, Inc.White Plains

Personalised recommendations