Advertisement

Evaluation of Feature Based Modelling in subtraction

  • Mark Kuzmycz
  • Geoffrey I. Webb
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 608)

Abstract

One aim of intelligent tutoring systems is to tailor lessons to each individual student's needs. To do this a tutoring system requires a model of the student's knowledge. Cognitive modelling aims to produce a detailed explanation of the student's progress. Feature Based Modelling forms a cognitive model of the student by creating aspects of problem descriptions and of students' responses. This paper will discuss Feature Based Modelling and show the results of an evaluation carried out in the domain of elementary subtraction.

Keywords

Concept Change Task Feature Student Modelling Subtraction Problem Feature Base Modelling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A. T., Lewis, M. W., Cognitive Modeling and Intelligent Tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 1990, Vol 42, pp. 7–49.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J. R., Conrad, F. G., Corbett, A. T., Skill Acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cognitive Science, 1989, Vol 13, pp. 467–505.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, J. S. and Burton, R. R., Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills. Cognitive Science, 1978, 2, 155–192.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, J. S. and VanLehn, K., Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural Skills. Cognitive Science, 1980, 4, 427–433.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burton R. Diagnosing bugs in a simple procedural skill. In D. Sleeman and J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Academic Press, London, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuzmycz, M. A. and Webb, G.I. Modelling Elementary Subtraction: Intelligent warfare against bugs. In Proceedings of the Fourth Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference, Launceston, pp. 367–376.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langley, P. and Ohlsson, S. Automated Cognitive Modelling. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Langley, P., Ohlsson, S. and Sage, S. A Machine Learning Approach to Student Modelling. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-84-7, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langley, P., Wogulis, J. and Ohlsson, S. Rules and Principles in Cognitive Diagnosis. In N. Fredericksen, R. Glaser, A. LesGold, M. G. Shafto (Eds.) Diagnostic Monitoring of Skill and Knowledge Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Hove and London, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    VanLehn, K. Arithmetic Procedures are induced from Examples. In J. Hiebert (Ed.) Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986, 133–179.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Webb, G. I., A knowledge based approach to computer-aided learning. International J. Man-Machine Studies, 1988, Vol 29, pp. 257–285.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Webb, G. I. Feature-Based Cognitive Diagnosis. Technical Report, Department of Computing and Mathematics, Deakin University, 1988.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Webb, G. I. A machine learning approach to student modelling. Proceedings of the Third Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Melbourne, 1988, pp. 195–205.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Webb, G.I. An attribute-value machine learning approach to student modelling. Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop W4: Agent Modelling for Intelligent Interaction, Sydney, 1991, 128–136.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whiteley, T.R. and Faria, A.J., A Study Of The Relationship Between Student Final Exam Performance And Simulation Game Participation. Simulation and Games, 1989, Vol. 20, 1, 44–64.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Young, R. M. and O'Shea, T., Errors in Children's Subtraction. Cognitive Science, 1981, 5, 153–177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Kuzmycz
    • 1
  • Geoffrey I. Webb
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing and MathematicsDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations