Advertisement

Specularities Reduce Ambiguity of Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo

  • Ondřej Drbohlav
  • Radim Šára
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2351)

Abstract

Lambertian photometric stereo with uncalibrated light directions and intensities determines the surface normals only up to an invertible linear transformation. We show that if object reflectance is a sum of Lambertian and specular terms, the ambiguity reduces into a 2dof group of transformations (compositions of isotropic scaling, rotation around the viewing vector, and change in coordinate frame handedness).

Such ambiguity reduction is implied by the consistent viewpoint constraint which requires that all lights reflected around corresponding specular normals must give the same vector (the viewing direction). To employ the constraint, identification of specularities in images corresponding to four different point lights in general configuration suffices. When the consistent viewpoint constraint is combined with integrability constraint, binary convex/concave ambiguity composed with isotropic scaling results. The approach is verified experimentally.

We observe that an analogical result applies to the case of uncalibrated geometric stereo with four affine cameras in a general configuration observing specularities from a single distant point light source.

Keywords

Light Direction Viewing Direction Illumination Direction Integrability Constraint Photometric Stereo 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    P. N. Belhumeur, D. J. Kriegman, and A. L. Yuille. The bas-relief ambiguity. International Journal of Computer Vision, 35(1):33–44, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. N. Coleman and R. Jain. Obtaining 3-dimensional shape of textured and specular surfaces using four-source photometry. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 18(4):309–328, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Drbohlav and R. Šára. Unambiguous determination of shape from photometric stereo with unknown light sources. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 1, pages 581–586, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Fan and L. B. Wolff. Surface curvature and shape reconstruction from unknown multiple illumination and integrability. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 65(2):347–359, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. S. Georghiades, D. J. Kriegman, and P. N. Belhumeur. Illumination cones for recognition under variable lighting: Faces. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 52–58, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Hayakawa. Photometric stereo under a light source with arbitrary motion. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 11(11):3079–3089, 1994.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Jacobs. Linear fitting with missing data: Applications to structure from motion and to characterizing intensity images. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 206–212, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. J. Koenderink and A. J. van Doorn. The generic bilinear calibration-estimation problem. International Journal of Computer Vision, 23(3):217–234, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Lin and S. W. Lee. Estimation of diffuse and specular appearance. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 855–860, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. K. Nayar, K. Ikeuchi, and T. Kanade. Determining shape and reflectance of hybrid surfaces by photometric sampling. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 6(4):418–431, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Solomon and K. Ikeuchi. Extracting the shape and roughness of specular lobe objects using four light photometric stereo. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(4):449–454, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Triggs, P. F. McLauchlan, R. I. Hartley, and A. F. Fitzgibbon. Bundle adjustment — a modern synthesis. In Proc. Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice. International Workshop on Vision Algorithms., volume 1883 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 298–372, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. J. Woodham. Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images. Optical Engineering, 19(1):139–144, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Yuille and D. Snow. Shape and albedo from multiple images using integrability. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 158–164, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.L. Yuille, J.M. Coughlan, and S. Konishi. The KGBR viewpoint-lighting ambiguity and its resolution by generic constraints. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 376–382, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ondřej Drbohlav
    • 1
  • Radim Šára
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Machine Perception, Department of Cybernetics Faculty of Electrical EngineeringCzech Technical University in Prague Technicka 2Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations