The Benefits of Displaying Additional Internal Document Information on Textual Database Search Result Lists

  • Offer Drori
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1923)


Most information systems, which perform computerized searches of textual databases, deal with the need to display a list of documents which fulfill the search criteria. The user must chose from a list of documents, those documents which are relevant to his search query. Selection of the relevant document is problematical, especially during searches of large databases which have a large number of documents fulfilling the search criteria. This article defines a new hierarchical tree which is made up of three levels of display of search results. In a series of previous studies (not yet published) which were carried out at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, the influence of information (within the documents) displayed to the user was examined in the framework of a list of responses to questions regarding user satisfaction with the method and the quality of his choices. In the present study, in addition to the information displayed in the list, information on the contents (subject) of the document was also displayed. The study examined the influence of this additional information on search time, user satisfaction and ease of using the systems.


Search Result Search Task Search Time Search Query Search Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Card, K., Robertson, G., York, W. The WebBook and the Web Forager: An information workspace for the World-Wide Web. Proceedings of CHI’ 96, ACM, (1996), 111–117.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, H., Houston, L., Sewell, R., Schatz, R. Internet browsing and searching: User evaluations of category map and concept space techniques. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(7), (1998), 582–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chimera, R. Value bars: An information visualization and navigation tool for multiatribute listings. Proceedings of CHI’92, ACM, (1992), 293–294.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chimera, R., Shneiderman, B. An exploratory evaluation of three interfaces for browsing larg Hierarchical tables of contents. ACM Transaction in Information Systems,ACM, 12, 4, (1994), 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drori, O. The user interface in text retrieval systems. SIGCHI Bulletin, ACM, 30, 3, (1998), 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drori, O. Displaying Search Results in Textual Databases, SIGCHI Bulletin, ACM, 32, 1, (2000), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drori, O. Using Text Elements by Context to Display Search Results in Information Retrieval Systems, Information Doors (a workshop proceedings held in conjunction with the ACM Hypertext 2000 and ACM Digital Libraries 2000 conferences), San Antonio, Texas, USA., (2000), 17–22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Egan, E. et al. Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser. Proceedings of CHI’ 89, ACM, (1989), 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fowler, H., Fowler, A. and Wilson, A. Integrating query, thesaurus, and documents through a common visual representation. Proceedings of SIGIR’ 91, ACM, (1991), 142–151.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hearst, M. TileBars: Visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. Proceedings of the CHI’ 95, ACM, (1995), 59–66Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hearst, M., and Karadi. C. Cat-a-Cone: An interface for specifying searches and reviewing retrieval results using a large category hierarchy. In Proceedings of SIGIR’ 97, ACM, (1997).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hertzum, M., Frokjaer, E. Browsing and querying in online documentation: A study of user interface and the interaction process. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM, 3, 2, (1996), 136–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohonen, T., Exploration of very large databases by self-organizing maps. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1, (1997), 1–6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Landauer, K. The trouble with computers-Usefulness, usability and productivity. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, (1995).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larkey, L. Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques. Proceedings of SIGIR’ 98, ACM, (1998), 90–95.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larkey, L., Brucecroft, W., Combing classifiers in text categorization. Proceedings of SIGIR’ 96, ACM, (1996), 289.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin, X. A self-organizing semantic map for Information retrieval. Proceedings of SIGIR’ 91, ACM, (1991), 262–269.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luhn, H., Keyword in Context Index for Technical Literature, American Documentation, XI (4), (1960), 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mackinlay, D., Rao, R., Card, K. An organic user Interface for searching citation links. Proceedings of CHI’ 95, ACM, (1995).Google Scholar
  20. 19a.
    Nowell, T. et al., Visualizing Search Results: Some Alternatives To Query-Document Similarity, Proceedings of SIGIR’ 96, ACM, (1996), 67–75.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Olsen, A., Korfhage, R., Spring, B., Sochats, M. and Williams, G., Visualization of a document collection: the VIBE system. Information Processing and Management, 29(1): (1993), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    Pirolli, P. et al., Scatter/gather browsing communicates the topic structure of a very large text collection. Proceedings of CHI’ 96, ACM, (1996), 213–220.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    Pitkow, J., Pirolli, P. Life, death, and lawfulness the electronic frontier: Proceedings of CHI’ 97, ACM, (1997), 213–220.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Shneiderman, B. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 3rd ed. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Spoerri, A. InfoCrystal: A visual tool for information retrieval and management. Proceedings of Information Knowledge and Management (CIKM’93), (1993), 150–7.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Swan, R. and Allan, J., Aspect windows, 3-D visualizations, and indirect comparisons of information retrieval systems. Proceedings of SIGIR’ 98, ACM, (1998).Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Terveen, L, Hill, W., Finding and visualizing Inter-site Clan graphs. Proceedings of CHI’ 98, ACM, (1998), 448–455.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Wise, J.A., Thomas, J.J., Pennock, K., Lantrip, D., Pottier, M., Schur, A. and Crow, V. Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents. Proceedings of the IEEE Information Visualization symposium, (1995), 51–8.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    Zamir, O., Etzioni, O. Grouper: A dynamic clustering interface to Web search results WWW8 Proceedings, Toronto: WWW, (1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Offer Drori
    • 1
  1. 1.Shaam - Information SystemsThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations