Advertisement

pp 1-25 | Cite as

The Effectiveness of Judicial Enforcement of the EU Consumer Protection Law

  • Emilia MišćenićEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law book series

Abstract

Through its case law, the CJEU has developed and established various legal institutions and principles guaranteeing the effectiveness of EU law including consumer protection law. Although much time has passed since the CJEU required from Member States’ courts to give the “Community (now: Union) law its full effect within the framework of the judicial systems of the Member States”, more recent cases demonstrate the serious struggles of the courts when it comes to the enforcement of the EU consumer protection law. The effectiveness of the judicial protection of consumer protection rights is sometimes undermined by the most basic questions, such as who qualifies a person as a “consumer” in a national civil law dispute, the court or the claimant? Moreover, recent studies of the European Commission demonstrate that the national courts are barely aware of their duty in an ex officio application of the EU consumer protection law. With the exception of the courts’ duty to examine the unfairness of contract terms in business-to-consumer (B2C) relations of their own motion, they seem to be reluctant to the idea of an ex officio application of consumer protection law. This paper examines the position of courts in this new environment of allegedly more effective enforcement mechanisms and questions to what extent the Member States’ courts are obliged to apply the EU consumer protection law ex officio.

References

  1. Arnull A (2011) The principle of effective judicial protection in EU law: an unruly horse? Eur Law Rev 36(1):51–70Google Scholar
  2. Cauffmann C (2016) Critical remarks on the ADR Directive. In: Cauffmann C, Smits J (eds) The citizen in European private law: norm-setting, enforcement and choice. Intersentia, pp 155–160Google Scholar
  3. Cortés P (2015) A new regulatory framework for extra-judicial consumer redress: where we are and how to move forward. Leg Stud 35(1):114–141Google Scholar
  4. Creutzfeldt N (2016) Implementation of the consumer ADR Directive. J Eur Consum Mark Law (1):169–175Google Scholar
  5. de Wulf V (2016) L’office du juge en matière de contrats destinés aux consommateurs. In: Verdure C (ed) Contrats et protection des consommateurs. Anthemis, pp 181–206Google Scholar
  6. Eidenmüller H, Fries M (2016) Against false settlement: designing efficient consumer rights enforcement systems in Europe. In: Micklitz H-W, Wechsler A (eds) The transformation of enforcement: European economic law in global perspective. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 87–114Google Scholar
  7. Heinze C (2009) Effektivitätsgrundsatz. In: Basedow et al (eds) Handwörterbuch des Europäischen Privatrechts, Volumen I. Mohr Siebeck, pp 337–341Google Scholar
  8. Inchausti FG (2014) Specific problems of cross-border consumer ADR: what solutions? Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (GPR) (4):197–208Google Scholar
  9. Iosifov I (2013) Neravnopravnite klauzi v konteksta na zapovednoto proizvodstvo. Nauchni trudove na Rusenskia Universitet 52(7):191–195Google Scholar
  10. Law S (2018) The transformation of consumer law in times of crisis: the ex officio control of unfair contract terms. In: Uzelac A, van Rhee CH (eds) Transformation of civil justice, unity and diversity. Springer, pp 283–307Google Scholar
  11. Leczykiewicz D, Weatherill S (eds) (2016) The images of the consumer in EU law: legislation, free movement and competition law. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  12. Loos MBM (2016) Consumer ADR after implementation of the ADR Directive: enforcing European consumer rights at the detriment of European consumer law. Eur Rev Priv Law (1):61–80Google Scholar
  13. Mak C (2014) Rights and remedies. Article 47 EUCFR and effective judicial protection in European private law matters. In: Micklitz H-W (ed) The constitutionalization of European private law. Oxford University Press, pp 236–258Google Scholar
  14. Micklitz H-W, Saumier G (eds) (2018) Enforcement and effectiveness of consumer law. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  15. Mišćenić E (2016) Legal risks in development of EU consumer protection law. In: Mišćenić E, Raccah A (eds) Legal risks in EU law: interdisciplinary studies on legal risk management and better regulation in Europe. Springer, pp 135–163Google Scholar
  16. Mišćenić E (2018a) Protection of consumers on the EU digital single market: virtual or real one? In: Viglianisi Ferraro A, Jagielska M, Selucka M (eds) The influence of the European legislation on national legal systems in the field of consumer protection. Cedam, Kluwer Law International, pp 219–246Google Scholar
  17. Mišćenić E (2018b) Uniform interpretation of Article 4(2) of UCT Directive in the context of consumer credit agreements: is it possible? Revue du droit de l’Union européenne (3):127–159Google Scholar
  18. Mišćenić E (2019) Croatian consumer protection law: from legal approximation to legal fragmentation. Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, Part I, XXII:189–222Google Scholar
  19. Pavillon C (2007) ECJ 26 October 2006, Case C-168-05 Mostaza Claro v. Centro Movil Milenium SL – the unfair contract terms directive: the ECJ’s third intervention in domestic procedural law. Eur Rev Priv Law:737–748Google Scholar
  20. Rühl G (2015) Alternative and online dispute resolution for (cross-border) consumer contracts: a critical evaluation of the European legislature’s recent efforts to promote competitiveness and growth in the internal market. J Consum Policy 38(4):431–456Google Scholar
  21. van Duin A (2017) Metamorphosis? The role of Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in cases concerning national remedies and procedures under Directive 93/13/EEC. J Eur Consum Mark Law (EuCML) 6(5):190–198Google Scholar
  22. Weber F (2015) Is ADR the superior mechanism for consumer contractual disputes? - An assessment of the incentivizing effects of the ADR Directive. J Consum Policy (38):265–285Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia

Personalised recommendations