Advertisement

Cross-Border Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements and Potential Impact on the Practice of International Arbitration

Observations from Singapore on the Adoption of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
  • Janet C. CheckleyEmail author
Chapter
  • 35 Downloads
Part of the Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law book series (BYEIL, volume 2019)

Abstract

On 7 August 2019, the new convention opened for signature at a ceremony in Singapore and at the time of publishing has 51 signatories. This article explores the potential impact of the new Convention on the practice of international arbitration. It predicts that while international arbitration is currently experiencing some transformative trends from other sources in the international dispute resolution landscape, the growth of cross-border mediation anticipated as a result of the new enforcement regime is unlikely to result in reduced reliance on international arbitration as a primary means of dispute resolution for current users. Instead, the new Convention will expand the suite of services available to international dispute resolution users and providers and expand access to dispute resolution for micro, small and medium enterprises conducting cross-border and transnational commerce in the new enforcement regime.

References

  1. Alexander N (2018) The Singapore convention on mediation. Kluwer Mediation Blog. http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/07/24/singapore-convention-mediation/. Accessed Mar 15 2019
  2. Bassi R, Newman J (2016) Increased transparency in international commercial arbitration. Financier Worldwide. https://www.financierworldwide.com/increased-transparency-in-international-commercial-arbitration#.XeSL5ZMzbjA. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
  3. Bell GF (2018) The new international commercial courts—competing with arbitration? The example of the Singapore international commercial court. Contemp Asia Arbitr J 11(2):193–216Google Scholar
  4. Butler P, Herbert C (2014) Access to justice for small and medium sized enterprises: the case for a bilateral arbitration treaty. NZULR 26(2014):186–221Google Scholar
  5. Choong J, Rosenberg K (2018) China’s belt and road initiative: opportunities and risks. Freshfield Bruckhaus Deringer, International Arbitration, illuminating the top trends in 2018Google Scholar
  6. Chua E (2015) Singapore: reflecting on the development of the domestic mediation scene. ADR World 1(1):20–21Google Scholar
  7. Chua E (2019) The Singapore convention on mediation - a brighter future for Asian dispute resolution. Asian J Int Law. Research Collection School of Law. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4827&context=sol_research. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  8. Clay C, Harvey N (2017) Why the current system of dispute resolution is stacked against SMEs. SME Guidance for Global Growth. http://www.smeweb.com/2017/04/10/current-system-dispute-resolution-stacked-smes/. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  9. Cosgrove E, Hosking A (2018) Open up! How far should transparency in international arbitration go? King & Wood Mallesons Insights. https://www.kwm.com/en/knowledge/insights/how-far-should-transparency-in-international-commercial-arbitration-go-20180412. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
  10. Croft J (2016) Singapore is becoming a world leader in arbitration. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/704c5458-e79a-11e5-a09b-1f8b0d268c39#axzz4AUrfZCHD. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  11. Gek TP (2018) Landmark ruling lets Triksomel unit liquidators tap commercial claims funder. The Business Times. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/landmark-ruling-lets-trikomsel-unit-liquidators-tap-commercial-claims-funder. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
  12. Gliddon J, Harrison R (2019) A changing battlefield for SME disputes. Financier Worldwide. https://www.financierworldwide.com/a-changing-battlefield-for-sme-disputes#.XeSeXJMzbjA. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  13. Global Pound Conference Series (2016–2017) Global data trends and regional differencesGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang C (2016) Singapore’s newest international commercial court set to thrive. Business Times. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapores-newest-international-commercial-court-set-to-thrive. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  15. IMF Bentham Blog (2018) Milestone decision on third party funding in Singapore. https://www.imf.sg/newsroom/blog/blog-full-post/imf-bentham-asia-blog/2018/09/12/milestone-decision-on-third-party-funding-in-singapore. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  16. International Council for Commercial Arbitration (2018) Report of the ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on third-party funding in international arbitration. The ICCA Reports No. 4Google Scholar
  17. Khanna D, Power R (2017) Transparency in international arbitration – striking the right balance. Clyde&Co Insight and Knowledge. https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/transparency-in-international-arbitration-striking-the-right-balance. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
  18. Lim G (2017) Development of mediation in Singapore. In: McFadden D, Lim G (eds) Mediation in Singapore, a practical guide, 2nd edn. Sweet and Maxwell, Singapore, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  19. Loh Q (2015) Perspectives on harmonising transnational commercial law. Thirty-five years of uniform sales law: trends and perspectives. In: Proceedings of the high level panel held during the forty-eighth session of the UN Commission of International Trade LawGoogle Scholar
  20. McDougall AL et al (2018) Recent trends in International Arbitration. White & Case Publications. https://www.whitecase.com/publications/article/recent-trends-international-arbitration. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
  21. Middleton J (2018) The rise of the international commercial court. Speech to the 2018 Hong Kong International Commercial Law Conference. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/FedJSchol/2018/18.html
  22. OECD (2017) Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level 2017: enhancing the contributions of SMEs in a global and digitalised economyGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberge J-F, Fraser V (2018) Access to commercial justice: a roadmap for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Design for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses (SMEs) disputes, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution (Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3299246. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  24. Saul J (2012) The legal and cultural roots of mediation in the United States. Opinio Juris in Comparatione, No. 1/2012, Paper No. 8Google Scholar
  25. Schnabel T (2018) The Singapore convention on mediation: a framework for the cross-border recognition and enforcement of mediated settlements. Pepperdine Dispute Resol Law J 19:1–61Google Scholar
  26. Secomb M, Wallin A (2018) Singapore: third party litigation funding law review, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  27. Seow BY (2018) UN treaty on mediation to be named after Singapore. The Straights Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/un-treaty-on-mediation-to-be-named-after-singapore. Accessed 28 Mar 2019
  28. Sun C, Leng SC (2018) Third-party funding – taking stock. Singapore Law Gazette. https://lawgazette.com.sg/feature/third-party-funding-taking-stock/. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
  29. Tung S, Lin B (2018) More transparency in international commercial arbitration: to have or not to have? Contemp Asia Arbitr J 11(1):21–44Google Scholar
  30. White & Case, Queen Mary University of London School of International Arbitration (2018) International arbitration survey: the evolution of international arbitrationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Singapore Management University School of Law, Singapore International Dispute Resolution AcademySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations