Advertisement

pp 1-21 | Cite as

Doping and Human Rights in Pariah States

  • David McArdleEmail author
Chapter
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration book series

Abstract

On first reading, case 2016/A/4708 Belarus Canoe Association and Belarusian Senior Men’s Canoe and Kayak Team Members v International Canoe Federation, award of 23 January 2017 (hereafter BCA v ICF) raises three familiar, deceptively simple, themes in anti-doping. Namely, the potential role of national criminal authorities in doping investigations; the relationship between those authorities and international sporting stakeholders; and the importance of those stakeholders adhering to their own rules when pursuing anti-doping allegations. This chapter addresses those aspects in detail, but the case has a significance that goes beyond anti-doping. Specifically, BCA v ICF raises wider issues about anti-doping actors whose obligations under the WADA regime cannot be easily reconciled with their reliance on governments that use sports as a tool for cronyism and furthering political agendas. Such is the case in Belarus, where the relationship between a supposedly independent national anti-doping authority and an ignoble and unhappy regime appears uncomfortably close. These concerns are compounded by sports federations which are only too happy to let Europe’s last dictatorship host their international events.

Keywords

Doping Tribunals Independence Belarus Human rights 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the editors, to Marjolaine Viret and to Catherine Ordway for their comments on an earlier draft, but the errors are mine alone.

References

  1. Hanstad D, Houlihan B (2015) Strengthening Global Anti-Doping Policy Through Bilateral Collaboration: the Example of Norway and China. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 7(Issue 4) 587–604.Google Scholar
  2. Hertogh M, Kurkchiyan M (2016) ‘When Politics Come Into Play, Law is No Longer Law’: Images of Collective Legal Consciousness in the UK, Poland and Bulgaria. International Journal of Law in Context 12 (Issue 4) 404–419.Google Scholar
  3. Turley T (2016) When the ‘Escape’ Ends. Responsibility of the IOC and FIFA at the Intersection of Sport Law and Human Rights. Notre Dame Journal of International and Comparative Law 6 (Issue 1) 145–165.Google Scholar
  4. Wilson A (2011) Belarus: The Last European Dictatorship, Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawStirling UniversityStirlingScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations